OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to develop a new method for analysis and presentation of esophageal distensibility data using high-resolution impedance planimetry recordings during a volume-controlled distention. METHODS: Two control subjects and six patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) with stricture, narrow caliber or normal endoscopy according to EndoFLIP studies were included for analysis. Median filtering and pulse detection techniques were applied to the pressure signal and a wavelet decomposition technique was applied to the 16 channels of raw esophageal diameter data to reduce vascular artifact, respiratory effect and remove esophageal contraction interference. These data were used to generate a functional luminal imaging probe (FLIP) topography plot that describes regional variation of cross-sectional area (CSA). A previously developed computer program was used to calculate and model the CSA-pressure data to derive the slope of line fitting and distension plateau for each individual subject. The results were compared among the four endoscopic phenotypes. RESULTS: Patients with EoE and normal endoscopy had similar esophageal distensibility parameters to those of normal controls whereas patients with EoE and stricture or narrow caliber had much lower distensibility than patients with EoE and normal endoscopy. The FLIP topography plots provided a global assessment of the esophageal distensibility along the axial plane of measurement that differentiated patients with varying degrees of endoscopic abnormality. CONCLUSIONS: New techniques can be leveraged to improve data analysis and presentation using EndoFLIP assessment of the esophageal body in EoE. These techniques may be helpful in defining clinically relevant phenotypes and guiding treatment strategies and should be helpful in structuring future outcome trials.
OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to develop a new method for analysis and presentation of esophageal distensibility data using high-resolution impedance planimetry recordings during a volume-controlled distention. METHODS: Two control subjects and six patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) with stricture, narrow caliber or normal endoscopy according to EndoFLIP studies were included for analysis. Median filtering and pulse detection techniques were applied to the pressure signal and a wavelet decomposition technique was applied to the 16 channels of raw esophageal diameter data to reduce vascular artifact, respiratory effect and remove esophageal contraction interference. These data were used to generate a functional luminal imaging probe (FLIP) topography plot that describes regional variation of cross-sectional area (CSA). A previously developed computer program was used to calculate and model the CSA-pressure data to derive the slope of line fitting and distension plateau for each individual subject. The results were compared among the four endoscopic phenotypes. RESULTS:Patients with EoE and normal endoscopy had similar esophageal distensibility parameters to those of normal controls whereas patients with EoE and stricture or narrow caliber had much lower distensibility than patients with EoE and normal endoscopy. The FLIP topography plots provided a global assessment of the esophageal distensibility along the axial plane of measurement that differentiated patients with varying degrees of endoscopic abnormality. CONCLUSIONS: New techniques can be leveraged to improve data analysis and presentation using EndoFLIP assessment of the esophageal body in EoE. These techniques may be helpful in defining clinically relevant phenotypes and guiding treatment strategies and should be helpful in structuring future outcome trials.
Authors: Sudip K Ghosh; John E Pandolfino; Qing Zhang; Andrew Jarosz; Nimeesh Shah; Peter J Kahrilas Journal: Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol Date: 2006-01-12 Impact factor: 4.052
Authors: Barry P McMahon; Jens B Frøkjaer; Peter Kunwald; Donghua Liao; Peter Funch-Jensen; Asbjørn M Drewes; Hans Gregersen Journal: Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol Date: 2006-08-31 Impact factor: 4.052
Authors: Monika A Kwiatek; Ikuo Hirano; Peter J Kahrilas; Jami Rothe; Daniel Luger; John E Pandolfino Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2010-09-19 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Seema Khan; Susan R Orenstein; Carlo Di Lorenzo; Samuel A Kocoshis; Philip E Putnam; Luther Sigurdsson; Theresa M Shalaby Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 3.199
Authors: Mani Najmabadi; Vijay K Devabhaktuni; Mohamad Sawan; Serge Mayrand; Carlo A Fallone Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng Date: 2009-03-21 Impact factor: 4.538
Authors: Dustin A Carlson; Zhiyue Lin; Peter J Kahrilas; Joel Sternbach; Erica N Donnan; Laurel Friesen; Zoe Listernick; Benjamin Mogni; John E Pandolfino Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2015-08-14 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Evan S Dellon; Hannah P Kim; Sarah L W Sperry; David A Rybnicek; John T Woosley; Nicholas J Shaheen Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2013-11-23 Impact factor: 9.427