OBJECTIVE: Retrospective analyses suggest that the treatment with beta blocker improves survival in patients with breast cancer and melanoma. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of medication with beta blocker in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer. METHODS: Included patients received treatment within two prospective clinical trials: AGO-OVAR 2.4 phase I trial (carboplatin/gemcitabine; N=25, protocol AGO-OVAR 2.4) and AGO led intergroup phase III trial (carboplatin vs carboplatin/gemcitabine; N=356, protocol AGO-OVAR 2.5, EORTC-GCG, NCIC CTG). Concurrent medication was documented after every cycle and thorough monitoring was conducted. RESULTS: During the studies 38 patients (9.97%) received a beta blocker as co-medication. Patients treated with beta blockers were significantly older than patients not treated with beta blockers. Response rates to chemotherapy were not different between patients treated with beta blockers and those who were not. After a median follow-up of 17 months, 349 (91.6%) patients had progressive disease and 267 (70.1%) patients had died. No difference in median progression-free survival (7.79 vs 7.62 months (p=0.95)) and overall survival (21.2 vs 17.3 months (p=0.18)) was recorded for patients treated with and without beta blocker. In multivariate analyses including age, platinum free-interval, study treatment and ECOG performance status beta blocker treatment was not associated with a significant impact on progression-free survival (HR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.65-1.31; p=0.65) and overall survival (HR:0.74; 95%CI: 0.49-1.11; p=0.15). CONCLUSIONS: In this series of recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer patients it could not be confirmed whether beta blocker treatment was associated with better or worse outcome.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: Retrospective analyses suggest that the treatment with beta blocker improves survival in patients with breast cancer and melanoma. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of medication with beta blocker in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer. METHODS: Included patients received treatment within two prospective clinical trials: AGO-OVAR 2.4 phase I trial (carboplatin/gemcitabine; N=25, protocol AGO-OVAR 2.4) and AGO led intergroup phase III trial (carboplatin vs carboplatin/gemcitabine; N=356, protocol AGO-OVAR 2.5, EORTC-GCG, NCIC CTG). Concurrent medication was documented after every cycle and thorough monitoring was conducted. RESULTS: During the studies 38 patients (9.97%) received a beta blocker as co-medication. Patients treated with beta blockers were significantly older than patients not treated with beta blockers. Response rates to chemotherapy were not different between patients treated with beta blockers and those who were not. After a median follow-up of 17 months, 349 (91.6%) patients had progressive disease and 267 (70.1%) patients had died. No difference in median progression-free survival (7.79 vs 7.62 months (p=0.95)) and overall survival (21.2 vs 17.3 months (p=0.18)) was recorded for patients treated with and without beta blocker. In multivariate analyses including age, platinum free-interval, study treatment and ECOG performance status beta blocker treatment was not associated with a significant impact on progression-free survival (HR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.65-1.31; p=0.65) and overall survival (HR:0.74; 95%CI: 0.49-1.11; p=0.15). CONCLUSIONS: In this series of recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancerpatients it could not be confirmed whether beta blocker treatment was associated with better or worse outcome.
Authors: Lois M Ramondetta; Wei Hu; Premal H Thaker; Diana L Urbauer; Gary B Chisholm; Shannon N Westin; Yunjie Sun; Pedro T Ramirez; Nicole Fleming; Sunil K Sahai; Alpa M Nick; Jesusa M G Arevalo; Thomas Dizon; Robert L Coleman; Steve W Cole; Anil K Sood Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2019-07-25 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Tianyi Huang; Shelley S Tworoger; Jonathan L Hecht; Megan S Rice; Anil K Sood; Laura D Kubzansky; Elizabeth M Poole Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2016-09-01 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Marisa Coelho; Cátia Soares-Silva; Daniela Brandão; Franca Marino; Marco Cosentino; Laura Ribeiro Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2016-10-05 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: Albina N Minlikeeva; Jo L Freudenheim; Rikki A Cannioto; J Brian Szender; Kevin H Eng; Francesmary Modugno; Roberta B Ness; Michael J LaMonte; Grace Friel; Brahm H Segal; Kunle Odunsi; Paul Mayor; Emese Zsiros; Barbara Schmalfeldt; Rüdiger Klapdor; Thilo Dӧrk; Peter Hillemanns; Linda E Kelemen; Martin Kӧbel; Helen Steed; Anna de Fazio; Susan J Jordan; Christina M Nagle; Harvey A Risch; Mary Anne Rossing; Jennifer A Doherty; Marc T Goodman; Robert Edwards; Keitaro Matsuo; Mika Mizuno; Beth Y Karlan; Susanne K Kjær; Estrid Høgdall; Allan Jensen; Joellen M Schildkraut; Kathryn L Terry; Daniel W Cramer; Elisa V Bandera; Lisa E Paddock; Lambertus A Kiemeney; Leon F Massuger; Jolanta Kupryjanczyk; Andrew Berchuck; Jenny Chang-Claude; Brenda Diergaarde; Penelope M Webb; Kirsten B Moysich Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2017-03-14 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Jack L Watkins; Premal H Thaker; Alpa M Nick; Lois M Ramondetta; Sanjeev Kumar; Diana L Urbauer; Koji Matsuo; Kathryn C Squires; Robert L Coleman; Susan K Lutgendorf; Pedro T Ramirez; Anil K Sood Journal: Cancer Date: 2015-08-24 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Tianyi Huang; Elizabeth M Poole; A Heather Eliassen; Olivia I Okereke; Laura D Kubzansky; Anil K Sood; John P Forman; Shelley S Tworoger Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2016-03-25 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Archana S Nagaraja; Nouara C Sadaoui; Susan K Lutgendorf; Lois M Ramondetta; Anil K Sood Journal: Expert Opin Investig Drugs Date: 2013-08-07 Impact factor: 6.206