Literature DB >> 23500452

Lowest colpopexy sacral fixation point alters vaginal axis and cul-de-sac depth.

Sunil Balgobin1, Meadow M Good, Shena J Dillon, Marlene M Corton.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the variation in vaginal axis and posterior cul-de-sac depth when the lowest suture used to attach the sacrocolpopexy mesh to the anterior longitudinal ligament is anchored at different levels. STUDY
DESIGN: At five lumbosacral mesh attachment sites, the anterior vaginal wall axis angle was measured relative to a line between the lowest border of the pubic symphysis and fourth sacral (S4) foramen in 9 unembalmed cadavers. The vertical distance from S4 to the posterior mesh was measured as a surrogate of cul-de-sac depth.
RESULTS: From a mesh fixation point at the lower border of S2 to a point at the lower border of L5, there was a 3-fold increase in both vaginal axis angle (13.04 ± 3.19 vs 42.88 ± 4.16 cm) and distance from S4 to the posterior mesh (2.50 ± 0.61 vs 7.38 ± 1.30 cm) between these points.
CONCLUSION: During sacrocolpopexy, progressively cephalad sacral attachment increases vaginal axis angle and cul-de-sac depth.
Copyright © 2013 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23500452     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.03.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  5 in total

1.  Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging before and 6 months after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.

Authors:  Robin M F van der Weiden; Elena Rociu; Guido H H Mannaerts; Marcel H A van Hooff; Mark E Vierhout; Mariella I J Withagen
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Comparison of strength of sacrocolpopexy mesh attachment using barbed and nonbarbed sutures.

Authors:  Marjorie L Pilkinton; Gregory C Levine; Laura Bennett; Harvey A Winkler; Dara F Shalom; Peter S Finamore
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Defining mechanisms of recurrence following apical prolapse repair based on imaging criteria.

Authors:  Shaniel T Bowen; Pamela A Moalli; Steven D Abramowitch; Mark E Lockhart; Alison C Weidner; Cecile A Ferrando; Charles W Nager; Holly E Richter; Charles R Rardin; Yuko M Komesu; Heidi S Harvie; Donna Mazloomdoost; Amaanti Sridhar; Marie G Gantz
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 10.693

4.  The feasibility of uterine-vaginal axis MRI-based as evaluation of surgical efficacy in women with pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Haifeng Wang; Jihong Shen; Song Li; Zhenhua Gao; Kunbin Ke; Peng Gu
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2022-04

5.  Comparison of the Axes and Positions of the Uterus and Vagina Between Women With and Without Pelvic Floor Organ Prolapse.

Authors:  Song Li; Xuewei Wen; Zhenhua Gao; Kunbin Ke; Jing Yang; Haifeng Wang; Yin Mo; Yizhen Zeng; Yuan Li; Daoming Tian; Jihong Shen
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-02-10
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.