Literature DB >> 23500406

Trends in concentrations of nitrate and total dissolved solids in public supply wells of the Bunker Hill, Lytle, Rialto, and Colton groundwater subbasins, San Bernardino County, California: influence of legacy land use.

Robert Kent1, Matthew K Landon.   

Abstract

Concentrations and temporal changes in concentrations of nitrate and total dissolved solids (TDS) in groundwater of the Bunker Hill, Lytle, Rialto, and Colton groundwater subbasins of the Upper Santa Ana Valley Groundwater Basin were evaluated to identify trends and factors that may be affecting trends. One hundred, thirty-one public-supply wells were selected for analysis based on the availability of data spanning at least 11 years between the late 1980s and the 2000s. Forty-one of the 131 wells (31%) had a significant (p<0.10) increase in nitrate and 14 wells (11%) had a significant decrease in nitrate. For TDS, 46 wells (35%) had a significant increase and 8 wells (6%) had a significant decrease. Slopes for the observed significant trends ranged from -0.44 to 0.91 mg/L/yr for nitrate (as N) and -8 to 13 mg/L/yr for TDS. Increasing nitrate trends were associated with greater well depth, higher percentage of agricultural land use, and being closer to the distal end of the flow system. Decreasing nitrate trends were associated with the occurrence of volatile organic compounds (VOCs); VOC occurrence decreases with increasing depth. The relations of nitrate trends to depth, lateral position, and VOCs imply that increasing nitrate concentrations are associated with nitrate loading from historical agricultural land use and that more recent urban land use is generally associated with lower nitrate concentrations and greater VOC occurrence. Increasing TDS trends were associated with relatively greater current nitrate concentrations and relatively greater amounts of urban land. Decreasing TDS trends were associated with relatively greater amounts of natural land use. Trends in TDS concentrations were not related to depth, lateral position, or VOC occurrence, reflecting more complex factors affecting TDS than nitrate in the study area. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23500406     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.02.042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  5 in total

1.  Spatial and temporal variability of fluoride concentrations in groundwater resources of Larestan and Gerash regions in Iran from 2003 to 2010.

Authors:  Hassan Amini; Gholam Ali Haghighat; Masud Yunesian; Ramin Nabizadeh; Amir Hossein Mahvi; Mohammad Hadi Dehghani; Rahim Davani; Abd-Rasool Aminian; Mansour Shamsipour; Naser Hassanzadeh; Hossein Faramarzi; Alireza Mesdaghinia
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 4.609

2.  Assessment of hydrochemical trends in the highly anthropised Guadalhorce River basin (southern Spain) in terms of compliance with the European groundwater directive for 2015.

Authors:  Begoña Urresti-Estala; Pablo Jiménez Gavilán; Iñaki Vadillo Pérez; Francisco Carrasco Cantos
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Triennial changes in groundwater quality in aquifers used for public supply in California: utility as indicators of temporal trends.

Authors:  Robert Kent; Matthew K Landon
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2016-10-08       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Impacts of groundwater recharge from rubber dams on the hydrogeological environment in Luoyang Basin, China.

Authors:  Shaogang Dong; Baiwei Liu; Huamin Liu; Shidong Wang; Lixin Wang
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-07-14

5.  Identifying areas of degrading and improving groundwater-quality conditions in the State of California, USA, 1974-2014.

Authors:  Bryant C Jurgens; Miranda S Fram; Jeffrey Rutledge; George L Bennett V
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 2.513

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.