Literature DB >> 23500318

Safety and feasibility of robotic percutaneous coronary intervention: PRECISE (Percutaneous Robotically-Enhanced Coronary Intervention) Study.

Giora Weisz1, D Christopher Metzger, Ronald P Caputo, Juan A Delgado, J Jeffrey Marshall, George W Vetrovec, Mark Reisman, Ron Waksman, Juan F Granada, Victor Novack, Jeffrey W Moses, Joseph P Carrozza.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety as well as the clinical and technical effectiveness of robotic-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention.
BACKGROUND: Robotic systems have been suggested to enhance the performance of cardiovascular procedures, as well as to provide protection from the occupational hazards that are associated with interventional practice.
METHODS: Patients with coronary artery disease and clinical indications for percutaneous intervention were enrolled. The coronary intervention was performed with the CorPath 200 robotic system, which consists of a remote interventional cockpit and a bedside disposable cassette that enables the operator to advance, retract, and rotate guidewires and catheters. The primary endpoints were clinical procedural success, defined as <30% residual stenosis at the completion of the robotic-assisted procedure without major adverse cardiovascular events within 30 days, and device technical success, defined as the successful manipulation of the intracoronary devices using the robotic system only.
RESULTS: A total of 164 patients were enrolled at 9 sites. Percutaneous coronary intervention was completed successfully without conversion to manual operation, and device technical success was achieved in 162 of 164 patients (98.8%). There were no device-related complications. Clinical procedural success was achieved in 160 of 164 patients (97.6%), whereas 4 (2.4%) had periprocedural non-Q-wave myocardial infarctions. No deaths, strokes, Q-wave myocardial infarctions, or revascularization occurred in the 30 days after the procedures. Radiation exposure for the primary operator was 95.2% lower than the levels found at the traditional table position.
CONCLUSIONS: This pivotal multicenter study with a robotic-enhanced coronary intervention system demonstrated the safety and feasibility of the system. The robotic remote-control procedure met the expected technical and clinical performance, with significantly lower radiation exposure to the operator. (Evaluation of the Safety and Effectiveness of the CorPath 200 System in Percutaneous Coronary Interventions [PCI] [PRECISE]; NCT01275092).
Copyright © 2013 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23500318     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.12.045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  35 in total

1.  Robotic-Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Through Transradial Approach: Experience in 4 Patients with Complex Lesions.

Authors:  Amornpol Anuwatworn; Muhammad Ali Kahn; Tomasz Stys; Marian Petrasko; Adam Stys
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2020-04-01

Review 2.  Conceptual Design and Procedure for an Autonomous Intramyocardial Injection Catheter.

Authors:  Weyland Cheng; Peter K Law
Journal:  Cell Transplant       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 3.  Robotic technology in cardiovascular medicine.

Authors:  Johannes Bonatti; George Vetrovec; Celia Riga; Oussama Wazni; Petr Stadler
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 4.  Cath Lab Robotics: Paradigm Change in Interventional Cardiology?

Authors:  Zachary K Wegermann; Rajesh V Swaminathan; Sunil V Rao
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2019-08-31       Impact factor: 2.931

5.  Guideline of the Brazilian Society of Cardiology on Telemedicine in Cardiology - 2019.

Authors:  Marcelo Antônio Cartaxo Queiroga Lopes; Gláucia Maria Moraes de Oliveira; Antonio Luiz Pinho Ribeiro; Fausto J Pinto; Helena Cramer Veiga Rey; Leandro Ioschpe Zimerman; Carlos Eduardo Rochitte; Fernando Bacal; Carisi Anne Polanczyk; Cidio Halperin; Edson Correia Araújo; Evandro Tinoco Mesquita; José Airton Arruda; Luis Eduardo Paim Rohde; Max Grinberg; Miguel Moretti; Paulo Ricardo Avancini Caramori; Roberto Vieira Botelho; Andréa Araújo Brandão; Ludhmila Abrahão Hajjar; Alexandre Fonseca Santos; Alexandre Siciliano Colafranceschi; Ana Paula Beck da Silva Etges; Bárbara Campos Abreu Marino; Bruna Stella Zanotto; Bruno Ramos Nascimento; Cesar Rocha Medeiros; Daniel Vitor de Vasconcelos Santos; Daniela Matos Arrowsmith Cook; Eduardo Antoniolli; Erito Marques de Souza Filho; Fábio Fernandes; Fabio Gandour; Francisco Fernandez; Germano Emilio Conceição Souza; Guilherme de Souza Weigert; Iran Castro; Jamil Ribeiro Cade; José Albuquerque de Figueiredo Neto; Juliano de Lara Fernandes; Marcelo Souza Hadlich; Marco Antonio Praça Oliveira; Maria Beatriz Alkmim; Maria Cristina da Paixão; Maurício Lopes Prudente; Miguel A S Aguiar Netto; Milena Soriano Marcolino; Monica Amorim de Oliveira; Osvaldo Simonelli; Pedro A Lemos Neto; Priscila Raupp da Rosa; Renato Minelli Figueira; Roberto Caldeira Cury; Rodrigo Coelho Almeida; Sandra Regina Franco Lima; Silvio Henrique Barberato; Thiago Inocêncio Constancio; Wladimir Fernandes de Rezende
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.000

6.  Robotics for neuroendovascular intervention: Background and primer.

Authors:  Kazim H Narsinh; Ricardo Paez; Kerstin Mueller; M Travis Caton; Amanda Baker; Randall T Higashida; Van V Halbach; Christopher F Dowd; Matthew R Amans; Steven W Hetts; Alexander M Norbash; Daniel L Cooke
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2021-08-16

Review 7.  Minimally Invasive Intracerebral Hemorrhage Evacuation: A review.

Authors:  Mishek J Musa; Austin B Carpenter; Christopher Kellner; Dimitri Sigounas; Isuru Godage; Saikat Sengupta; Chima Oluigbo; Kevin Cleary; Yue Chen
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 3.934

8.  Safety and effectiveness of introducing a robotic-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention program in a tertiary center: a prospective study.

Authors:  Pedro A Lemos; Marcelo Franken; Jose Mariani; Adriano Caixeta; Breno O Almeida; Fabio G Pitta; Guy F A Prado; Stefano Garzon; Felipe Ramalho; Gabriel Albuquerque; Ivanise M Gomes; Irisvaldo S de Oliveira; Leonardo Valle; Leonardo Galastri; Breno B Affonso; Felipe Nasser; Rodrigo G Garcia
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2022-02

Review 9.  Robotic-Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Nathan Lo; Jorge Antonio Gutierrez; Rajesh V Swaminathan
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-02-24

10.  Remote Surgery Using a Neuroendovascular Intervention Support Robot Equipped with a Sensing Function: Experimental Verification.

Authors:  Shigeru Miyachi; Yoshitaka Nagano; Reo Kawaguchi; Tomotaka Ohshima; Hiroki Tadauchi
Journal:  Asian J Neurosurg       Date:  2021-05-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.