Literature DB >> 23500292

2013 appropriate utilization of cardiovascular imaging: a methodology for the development of joint criteria for the appropriate utilization of cardiovascular imaging by the American College of Cardiology Foundation and American College of Radiology.

J Jeffrey Carr, Robert C Hendel, Richard D White, Manesh R Patel, Michael J Wolk, Michael A Bettmann, Pamela Douglas, Frank J Rybicki, Christopher M Kramer, Pamela K Woodard, Leslee J Shaw, E Kent Yucel.   

Abstract

The American College of Radiology (ACR) and the American College of Cardiology Foundation (ACCF) have jointly developed a method to define appropriate utilization of cardiovascular imaging. The primary role of this method is to create a series of documents to define the utility of cardiovascular imaging procedures in relation to specific clinical questions, with the aim of defining what, if any, imaging tests are indicated to help to determine diagnosis, treatment, or outcome. The methodology accomplishes this aim through the application of systematic evidence reviews integrated with expert opinion by means of a rigorous Delphi process. By obtaining broad input during the development process from radiologists, cardiologists, primary care physicians, and other stakeholders, these documents are intended to provide practical evidence-based guidance to ordering providers, imaging laboratories, interpreting physicians, patients, and policymakers as to optimal cardiovascular imaging utilization. This document details the history, rationale, and methodology for developing these joint documents for appropriate utilization of cardiovascular imaging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23500292     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.02.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  6 in total

1.  The incremental impact of cardiac MRI on clinical decision-making.

Authors:  Adil Rajwani; Michael J Stewart; James D Richardson; Nicholas M Child; Neil Maredia
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Cardiovascular imaging: a glimpse into the future.

Authors:  William A Zoghbi
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2014 Jul-Sep

3.  ImageGuide Update.

Authors:  Peter L Tilkemeier; John J Mahmarian; David G Wolinsky; Elizabeth A Denton
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-07-18       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  ANMCO position paper: 2022 focused update of appropriate use criteria for multimodality imaging: aortic valve disease.

Authors:  Federico Nardi; Paolo Giuseppe Pino; Leonardo De Luca; Carmine Riccio; Manlio Cipriani; Marco Corda; Giuseppina Maura Francese; Domenico Gabrielli; Fabrizio Oliva; Michele Massimo Gulizia; Furio Colivicchi
Journal:  Eur Heart J Suppl       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 1.624

Review 5.  Patient-centered imaging: shared decision making for cardiac imaging procedures with exposure to ionizing radiation.

Authors:  Andrew J Einstein; Daniel S Berman; James K Min; Robert C Hendel; Thomas C Gerber; J Jeffrey Carr; Manuel D Cerqueira; S James Cullom; Robert DeKemp; Neal W Dickert; Sharmila Dorbala; Reza Fazel; Ernest V Garcia; Raymond J Gibbons; Sandra S Halliburton; Jörg Hausleiter; Gary V Heller; Scott Jerome; John R Lesser; Gilbert L Raff; Peter Tilkemeier; Kim A Williams; Leslee J Shaw
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Assessment of inpatient multimodal cardiac imaging appropriateness at large academic medical centers.

Authors:  Andrew Remfry; Howard Abrams; David M Dudzinski; Rory B Weiner; R Sacha Bhatia
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 2.062

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.