Literature DB >> 23500237

Evaluation of ranolazine in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and chronic stable angina: results from the TERISA randomized clinical trial (Type 2 Diabetes Evaluation of Ranolazine in Subjects With Chronic Stable Angina).

Mikhail Kosiborod1, Suzanne V Arnold, John A Spertus, Darren K McGuire, Yan Li, Patrick Yue, Ori Ben-Yehuda, Amos Katz, Philip G Jones, Ann Olmsted, Luiz Belardinelli, Bernard R Chaitman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to examine the efficacy of ranolazine versus placebo on weekly angina frequency and sublingual nitroglycerin use in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease (CAD), and chronic stable angina who remain symptomatic despite treatment with up to 2 antianginal agents.
BACKGROUND: Patients with diabetes have more extensive CAD than those without diabetes, and a high burden of angina. Ranolazine is not only effective in treating angina but also may improve glycemic control, thus providing several potential benefits in this high-risk group. We conducted a randomized trial to test the antianginal benefit of ranolazine in patients with diabetes and stable angina.
METHODS: TERISA (Type 2 Diabetes Evaluation of Ranolazine in Subjects With Chronic Stable Angina) was an international, randomized, double-blind trial of ranolazine versus placebo in patients with diabetes, CAD, and stable angina treated with 1 to 2 antianginals. After a single-blind, 4-week placebo run-in, patients were randomized to 8 weeks of double-blind ranolazine (target dose 1000 mg bid) or placebo. Anginal episodes and nitroglycerin use were recorded with daily entry into a novel electronic diary. Primary outcome was the average weekly number of anginal episodes over the last 6 weeks of the study.
RESULTS: A total of 949 patients were randomized across 104 centers in 14 countries. Mean age was 64 years, 61% were men, mean diabetes duration was 7.5 years, and mean baseline HbA1c was 7.3%. Electronic diary data capture was 98% in both groups. Weekly angina frequency was significantly lower with ranolazine versus placebo (3.8 [95% confidence interval (CI): 3.6 to 4.1] episodes vs. 4.3 [95% CI: 4.0 to 4.5] episodes, p = 0.008), as was the weekly sublingual nitroglycerin use (1.7 [95% CI: 1.6 to 1.9] doses vs. 2.1 [95% CI: 1.9 to 2.3] doses, p = 0.003). There was no difference in the incidence of serious adverse events between groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with diabetes and chronic angina despite treatment with up to 2 agents, ranolazine reduced angina and sublingual nitroglycerin use and was well tolerated. (Type 2 Diabetes Evaluation of Ranolazine in Subjects With Chronic Stable Angina [TERISA]; NCT01425359).
Copyright © 2013 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23500237     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.02.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  49 in total

Review 1.  Developmental actions of natriuretic peptides in the brain and skeleton.

Authors:  J A Waschek
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 9.261

2.  Ranolazine's sweet side--improvement of glycaemic control by the novel mechanism of skeletal muscle microvascular recruitment.

Authors:  Richard L Verrier
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Cost-utility of ranolazine for the symptomatic treatment of patients with chronic angina pectoris in Spain.

Authors:  Alvaro Hidalgo-Vega; Juan Manuel Ramos-Goñi; Renata Villoro
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2014-12

4.  Diabetes: Ranolazine decreases angina.

Authors:  Megan Cully
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 5.  Late sodium current associated cardiac electrophysiological and mechanical dysfunction.

Authors:  Shandong Yu; Gang Li; Christopher L-H Huang; Ming Lei; Lin Wu
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 3.657

6.  Residual Angina After Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Anna Grodzinsky; Mikhail Kosiborod; Fengming Tang; Philip G Jones; Darren K McGuire; John A Spertus; John F Beltrame; Jae-Sik Jang; Abhinav Goyal; Neel M Butala; Robert W Yeh; Suzanne V Arnold
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2017-09

Review 7.  Challenges with Evidence-Based Management of Stable Ischemic Heart Disease.

Authors:  Amit V Patel; Sripal Bangalore
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.931

8.  Sequential proteome alterations during genesis and progression of colon cancer.

Authors:  U J Roblick; D Hirschberg; J K Habermann; C Palmberg; S Becker; S Krüger; M Gustafsson; H-P Bruch; B Franzén; T Ried; T Bergmann; G Auer; H Jörnvall
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 9.  Treatment of refractory angina in patients not suitable for revascularization.

Authors:  Timothy D Henry; Daniel Satran; E Marc Jolicoeur
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2013-12-24       Impact factor: 32.419

10.  Angina treatments and prevention of cardiac events: an appraisal of the evidence.

Authors:  David E Winchester; Carl J Pepine
Journal:  Eur Heart J Suppl       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 1.803

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.