BACKGROUND: In vitro cell culture is a widely used technique for investigating a range of processes such as stem cell behavior, regenerative medicine, tissue engineering, and drug discovery. Conventional cell culture is performed in Petri dishes or flasks where cells typically attach to a flat glass or plastic surface as a cell monolayer. However, 2D cell monolayers do not provide a satisfactory representation of in vivo conditions. A 3D culture could be a much better system for representing the conditions that prevail in vivo. METHODS AND RESULTS: To simulate 3D conditions, vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) were loaded with gold-polyvmer-iron oxide hydrogel, enabling levitation of the cells by using spatially varying magnetic fields. These magnetically levitated 3D cultures appeared as freely suspended, clustered cells which proliferated 3-4 times faster than cells in conventional 2D cultures. When the levitated cells were treated with 10nM lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC), for 3days, cell clusters exhibited translucent extensions/rods 60-80μm wide and 200-250μm long. When 0.5μg/μl Schnurri-3 was added to the culture containing LPC, these extensions were smaller or absent. When excited with 590-650nm light, these extensions emitted intrinsic fluorescence at >667nm. When the 3D cultures were treated with a fluorescent probe specific for calcium hydroxyapatite (FITC-HABP-19), the cell extensions/rods emitted intensely at 518nm, the λmax for FITC emission. Pellets of cells treated with LPC were more enriched in calcium, phosphate, and glycosaminoglycans than cells treated with LPC and Schnurri-3. CONCLUSIONS: In 3D cultures, VSMCs grow more rapidly and form larger calcification clusters than cells in 2D cultures. Transdifferentiation of VSMC into calcifying vascular cells is enhanced by LPC and attenuated by Schnurri-3. GENERAL SIGNIFICANCE: The formation of calcified structures in 3D VSMC cultures suggests that similar structures may be formed in vivo.
BACKGROUND: In vitro cell culture is a widely used technique for investigating a range of processes such as stem cell behavior, regenerative medicine, tissue engineering, and drug discovery. Conventional cell culture is performed in Petri dishes or flasks where cells typically attach to a flat glass or plastic surface as a cell monolayer. However, 2D cell monolayers do not provide a satisfactory representation of in vivo conditions. A 3D culture could be a much better system for representing the conditions that prevail in vivo. METHODS AND RESULTS: To simulate 3D conditions, vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) were loaded with gold-polyvmer-iron oxide hydrogel, enabling levitation of the cells by using spatially varying magnetic fields. These magnetically levitated 3D cultures appeared as freely suspended, clustered cells which proliferated 3-4 times faster than cells in conventional 2D cultures. When the levitated cells were treated with 10nM lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC), for 3days, cell clusters exhibited translucent extensions/rods 60-80μm wide and 200-250μm long. When 0.5μg/μl Schnurri-3 was added to the culture containing LPC, these extensions were smaller or absent. When excited with 590-650nm light, these extensions emitted intrinsic fluorescence at >667nm. When the 3D cultures were treated with a fluorescent probe specific for calcium hydroxyapatite (FITC-HABP-19), the cell extensions/rods emitted intensely at 518nm, the λmax for FITC emission. Pellets of cells treated with LPC were more enriched in calcium, phosphate, and glycosaminoglycans than cells treated with LPC and Schnurri-3. CONCLUSIONS: In 3D cultures, VSMCs grow more rapidly and form larger calcification clusters than cells in 2D cultures. Transdifferentiation of VSMC into calcifying vascular cells is enhanced by LPC and attenuated by Schnurri-3. GENERAL SIGNIFICANCE: The formation of calcified structures in 3D VSMC cultures suggests that similar structures may be formed in vivo.
Authors: Su Jin Park; Seung-Hyun Jung; Gadi Jogeswar; Hyun-Mo Ryoo; Jong In Yook; Han Seok Choi; Yumie Rhee; Cheol-Hee Kim; Sung-Kil Lim Journal: Bone Date: 2010-03-07 Impact factor: 4.398
Authors: Glauco R Souza; Jennifer R Molina; Robert M Raphael; Michael G Ozawa; Daniel J Stark; Carly S Levin; Lawrence F Bronk; Jeyarama S Ananta; Jami Mandelin; Maria-Magdalena Georgescu; James A Bankson; Juri G Gelovani; T C Killian; Wadih Arap; Renata Pasqualini Journal: Nat Nanotechnol Date: 2010-03-14 Impact factor: 39.213
Authors: Dallas C Jones; Michelle N Schweitzer; Marc Wein; Kirsten Sigrist; Tsuyoshi Takagi; Shunsuke Ishii; Laurie H Glimcher Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2010-04-19 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Richard I Han; Thomas M Wheeler; Alan B Lumsden; Michael J Reardon; Gerald M Lawrie; K Jane Grande-Allen; Joel D Morrisett; Gerd Brunner Journal: Comput Biol Med Date: 2016-01-22 Impact factor: 4.589
Authors: Claudia Ulbrich; Markus Wehland; Jessica Pietsch; Ganna Aleshcheva; Petra Wise; Jack van Loon; Nils Magnusson; Manfred Infanger; Jirka Grosse; Christoph Eilles; Alamelu Sundaresan; Daniela Grimm Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2014-07-10 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Hubert Tseng; Jacob A Gage; William L Haisler; Shane K Neeley; Tsaiwei Shen; Chris Hebel; Herbert G Barthlow; Matthew Wagoner; Glauco R Souza Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2016-08-01 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Anna Witasp; Karin Luttropp; Abdul Rashid Qureshi; Peter Barany; Olof Heimbürger; Lars Wennberg; Tomas J Ekström; Paul G Shiels; Peter Stenvinkel; Louise Nordfors Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-01-10 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Hubert Tseng; Jacob A Gage; Tsaiwei Shen; William L Haisler; Shane K Neeley; Sue Shiao; Jianbo Chen; Pujan K Desai; Angela Liao; Chris Hebel; Robert M Raphael; Jeanne L Becker; Glauco R Souza Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2015-09-14 Impact factor: 4.379