OBJECTIVES: The role of micropapillary urothelial carcinoma (MUC) variant histology as an independent prognostic factor for survival after radical cystectomy has not been studied. Our aim was to examine the impact of MUC on survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from the University of Southern California (USC) Bladder Cancer Database was performed. Between 1985 and 2008, 1,380 patients underwent radical cystectomy and superextended pelvic lymph node dissection for bladder cancer. All surgical specimens underwent central pathologic review by dedicated genitourinary pathologists. Histologic type was categorized as urothelial carcinoma (UC; n = 1,347) or MUC (n = 33). The outcomes were overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional regression models were used to analyze survival data. RESULTS: The median follow-up duration was 10 years (range, 0-25 years). Baseline characteristics were similar between histologic types except MUC was associated with advanced clinical (cTanyN1-3: 2% vs. 9%, P = 0.03) and pathologic (pTanyN1-3: 22% vs. 46%, P = 0.01) TNM stage, multifocality (38% vs. 58%, P = 0.02), and high nuclear grade (83% vs. 97%, P = 0.03). The predicted 5-year OS (61% and 67%, Log rank P = 0.96) and RFS (69% and 58%, Log rank P = 0.33) rates did not differ between patients with UC and MUC. Multivariable analysis showed that histologic type was not independently associated with OS (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.55-1.49, P = 0.70) or RFS (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.55-1.73, P = 0.92). CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes of radical cystectomy for patients with MUC are similar to those with UC when controlling for other clinical and pathologic factors.
OBJECTIVES: The role of micropapillary urothelial carcinoma (MUC) variant histology as an independent prognostic factor for survival after radical cystectomy has not been studied. Our aim was to examine the impact of MUC on survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from the University of Southern California (USC) Bladder Cancer Database was performed. Between 1985 and 2008, 1,380 patients underwent radical cystectomy and superextended pelvic lymph node dissection for bladder cancer. All surgical specimens underwent central pathologic review by dedicated genitourinary pathologists. Histologic type was categorized as urothelial carcinoma (UC; n = 1,347) or MUC (n = 33). The outcomes were overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional regression models were used to analyze survival data. RESULTS: The median follow-up duration was 10 years (range, 0-25 years). Baseline characteristics were similar between histologic types except MUC was associated with advanced clinical (cTanyN1-3: 2% vs. 9%, P = 0.03) and pathologic (pTanyN1-3: 22% vs. 46%, P = 0.01) TNM stage, multifocality (38% vs. 58%, P = 0.02), and high nuclear grade (83% vs. 97%, P = 0.03). The predicted 5-year OS (61% and 67%, Log rank P = 0.96) and RFS (69% and 58%, Log rank P = 0.33) rates did not differ between patients with UC and MUC. Multivariable analysis showed that histologic type was not independently associated with OS (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.55-1.49, P = 0.70) or RFS (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.55-1.73, P = 0.92). CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes of radical cystectomy for patients with MUC are similar to those with UC when controlling for other clinical and pathologic factors.
Authors: Simone Bertz; S Wach; H Taubert; R Merten; F S Krause; S Schick; O J Ott; E Weigert; O Dworak; C Rödel; R Fietkau; B Wullich; B Keck; A Hartmann Journal: Virchows Arch Date: 2016-07-08 Impact factor: 4.064
Authors: Daniel L Willis; Mario I Fernandez; Rian J Dickstein; Sahil Parikh; Jay B Shah; Louis L Pisters; Charles C Guo; Samuel Henderson; Bogdan A Czerniak; H Barton Grossman; Colin P Dinney; Ashish M Kamat Journal: J Urol Date: 2014-09-22 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Qiang Li; Melissa Assel; Nicole E Benfante; Eugene J Pietzak; Harry W Herr; Machele Donat; Eugene K Cha; Timothy F Donahue; Bernard H Bochner; Guido Dalbagni Journal: Eur Urol Focus Date: 2017-06-27
Authors: Alexandra Masson-Lecomte; Pierre Colin; Gregory Bozzini; Laurent Nison; Alexandre de La Taille; Eva Comperat; Marc Zerbib; François Rozet; Xavier Cathelineau; Antoine Valeri; Alain Ruffion; Laurent Guy; Stéphane Droupy; Olivier Cussenot; Morgan Rouprêt Journal: World J Urol Date: 2013-08-02 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Daniel L Willis; Thomas W Flaig; Donna E Hansel; Matthew I Milowsky; Robert L Grubb; Hikmat A Al-Ahmadie; Elizabeth R Plimack; Theresa M Koppie; David J McConkey; Colin P Dinney; Vanessa A Hoffman; Michael J Droller; Edward Messing; Ashish M Kamat Journal: Urol Oncol Date: 2014-06-13 Impact factor: 3.498
Authors: Wassim Kassouf; Armen Aprikian; Peter Black; Girish Kulkarni; Jonathan Izawa; Libni Eapen; Adrian Fairey; Alan So; Scott North; Ricardo Rendon; Srikala S Sridhar; Tarik Alam; Fadi Brimo; Normand Blais; Chris Booth; Joseph Chin; Peter Chung; Darrel Drachenberg; Yves Fradet; Michael Jewett; Ron Moore; Chris Morash; Bobby Shayegan; Geoffrey Gotto; Neil Fleshner; Fred Saad; D Robert Siemens Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Date: 2016-02-08 Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: Alexandra Masson-Lecomte; Evanguelos Xylinas; Morgane Bouquot; Mathilde Sibony; Yves Allory; Eva Comperat; Marc Zerbib; Alexandre de la Taille; Morgan Rouprêt Journal: World J Urol Date: 2014-09-02 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Marco Moschini; David D'Andrea; Stephan Korn; Yasin Irmak; Francesco Soria; Eva Compérat; Shahrokh F Shariat Journal: Nat Rev Urol Date: 2017-09-12 Impact factor: 14.432