Literature DB >> 23498379

Evaluation of the capacity to appoint a healthcare proxy.

Jennifer Moye1, Charles P Sabatino, Rebecca Weintraub Brendel.   

Abstract

The appointment of a healthcare proxy is the most common way through which patients appoint a surrogate decision maker in anticipation of a future time in which they may lack the ability to make medical decisions themselves. In some situations, when a patient has not previously appointed a surrogate decision maker through an advance directive, the healthcare team may ask whether the patient, although lacking the capacity to make a healthcare decision, might still have the capacity to appoint a healthcare proxy. In this article the authors summarize the existing, albeit limited, legal and empirical basis for this capacity and propose a model for assessing capacity to appoint a healthcare proxy that incorporates clinical factors in the context of the risks and benefits specific to surrogate appointment under the law. In particular, it is important to weigh patients' understanding and choice within the context of the risks and benefits of the medical and interpersonal factors. Questions to guide capacity assessment are provided for clinical use and refinement through future research.
Copyright © 2013 American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23498379      PMCID: PMC4859336          DOI: 10.1016/j.jagp.2012.09.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Geriatr Psychiatry        ISSN: 1064-7481            Impact factor:   4.105


  28 in total

1.  Assessing the competence of persons with Alzheimer's disease in providing informed consent for participation in research.

Authors:  S Y Kim; E D Caine; G W Currier; A Leibovici; J M Ryan
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 18.112

Review 2.  Advance care planning by proxy for residents of long-term care facilities who lack decision-making capacity.

Authors:  Ladislav Volicer; Michael D Cantor; Arthur R Derse; Denise Murray Edwards; Angela M Prudhomme; Dorothy C Rasinski Gregory; James E Reagan; James A Tulsky; Ellen Fox
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 5.562

3.  Alzheimer's disease patients' and caregivers' capacity, competency, and reasons to enroll in an early-phase Alzheimer's disease clinical trial.

Authors:  Jason H T Karlawish; David J Casarett; Bryan D James
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.562

Review 4.  An approach to selected legal issues: confidentiality, mandatory reporting, abuse and neglect, informed consent, capacity decisions, boundary issues, and malpractice claims.

Authors:  Rebecca Weintraub Brendel; Marlynn H Wei; Ronald Schouten; Judith G Edersheim
Journal:  Med Clin North Am       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 5.456

5.  Decision-making capacity to execute a health care proxy: development and testing of guidelines.

Authors:  M Mezey; J Teresi; G Ramsey; E Mitty; T Bobrowitz
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 5.562

6.  Neuropsychologic predictors of competency in Alzheimer's disease using a rational reasons legal standard.

Authors:  D C Marson; H A Cody; K K Ingram; L E Harrell
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  1995-10

7.  Perceived quality of life and preferences for life-sustaining treatment in older adults.

Authors:  R F Uhlmann; R A Pearlman
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1991-03

8.  Decision making for participation in dementia research.

Authors:  Betty S Black; Malory Wechsler; Linda Fogarty
Journal:  Am J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 4.105

9.  Decisional capacity for research participation in individuals with mild cognitive impairment.

Authors:  Angela L Jefferson; Susan Lambe; David J Moser; Laura K Byerly; Al Ozonoff; Jason H Karlawish
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2008-05-12       Impact factor: 5.562

10.  Assessing patients' capacities to consent to treatment.

Authors:  P S Appelbaum; T Grisso
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1988-12-22       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Family Caregivers and Consumer Health Information Technology.

Authors:  Jennifer L Wolff; Jonathan D Darer; Kevin L Larsen
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  Assessment of Healthcare Decision-making Capacity.

Authors:  Barton W Palmer; Alexandrea L Harmell
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 2.813

3.  Associations Between Family Member Involvement and Outcomes of Patients Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit: Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Tamryn F Gray; Anne Kwok; Khuyen M Do; Sandra Zeng; Edward T Moseley; Yasser M Dbeis; Renato Umeton; James A Tulsky; Areej El-Jawahri; Charlotta Lindvall
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2022-06-15

4.  SHARING Choices: A Pilot Study to Engage Family in Advance Care Planning of Older Adults With and Without Cognitive Impairment in the Primary Care Context.

Authors:  Jennifer L Wolff; Danny Scerpella; Kimberly Cockey; Naaz Hussain; Tara Funkhouser; Diane Echavarria; Jennifer Aufill; Amy Guo; Danetta H Sloan; Sydney M Dy; Kelly M Smith
Journal:  Am J Hosp Palliat Care       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 2.500

Review 5.  Assessing capacity to consent for research in cognitively impaired older patients.

Authors:  Thomas Gilbert; Antoine Bosquet; Catherine Thomas-Antérion; Marc Bonnefoy; Olivia Le Saux
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 4.458

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.