Literature DB >> 23497968

Balanced and unbalanced reciprocal translocation: an overview of a 30-year experience in a single tertiary medical center in Taiwan.

Yi-Wen Chang1, Peng-Hui Wang, Wai Hou Li, Ling-Chao Chen, Chia-Ming Chang, Pi-Lin Sung, Ming-Jie Yang, Ling-Yi Cheng, Yu-Ling Lai, Yung-Yung Cheng, Chang-Ching Yeh, Wen-Hsun Chang, Shiau-You Wang, Shang-Rong Chen, Ming-Shyen Yen, Kuan-Chong Chao.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reciprocal translocation is the most common type of translocation; however, there are only a few studies that address the indications for reciprocal translocation in amniocentesis. Here we share our data, based on 30 years' experience in a single tertiary center, to investigate the rates and indications for amniocentesis in cases of reciprocal translocations.
METHODS: A retrospective review of 16,749 pregnant women, who underwent midtrimester amniocentesis between January 1981 and December 2010, was conducted. Seventy-four cases of reciprocal translocation were identified.
RESULTS: The percentage of reciprocal translocations in all amniocentesis cases was 0.44% (74/16,749); of these 74 cases, 56 were balanced and 18 unbalanced. De novo abnormality occurred in 23 cases, which constituted 31.1% of all reciprocal translocations. The three major indications for amniocentesis with a diagnosis of reciprocal translocation included advanced maternal age (AMA, 52.7%), a parent with an abnormal karyotype (17.6%), and abnormal biochemical markers in the maternal serum (12.2%). For individual types of reciprocal translocations (balanced and unbalanced), except for the presence of abnormal biochemical markers in maternal serum, both AMA and a parent with an abnormal karyotype were primary indications for amniocentesis. However, the highest percentage of reciprocal translocations in all amniocentesis cases was found in cases involving a parent with an abnormal karyotype (5.16%, 13/252).
CONCLUSION: Patients with a parent who carries an abnormal karyotype should be encouraged to undergo amniocentesis in prenatal consultation, since the risk of a diagnosis of reciprocal translocation can be particularly high.
Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23497968     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcma.2012.11.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chin Med Assoc        ISSN: 1726-4901            Impact factor:   2.743


  4 in total

1.  De novo unbalanced translocations have a complex history/aetiology.

Authors:  Maria Clara Bonaglia; Nehir Edibe Kurtas; Edoardo Errichiello; Sara Bertuzzo; Silvana Beri; Mana M Mehrjouy; Aldesia Provenzano; Debora Vergani; Vanna Pecile; Francesca Novara; Paolo Reho; Marilena Carmela Di Giacomo; Giancarlo Discepoli; Roberto Giorda; Micheala A Aldred; Cíntia Barros Santos-Rebouças; Andressa Pereira Goncalves; Diane N Abuelo; Sabrina Giglio; Ivana Ricca; Fabrizia Franchi; Philippos Patsalis; Carolina Sismani; María Angeles Morí; Julián Nevado; Niels Tommerup; Orsetta Zuffardi
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  Two siblings with unbalanced t(10;21) translocations and non-neuropathic neuropathic bladder.

Authors:  Mandela Thyoka; Alex Henderson; Bozena Starzyk; Anupam Lall
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2014-02-07

3.  Structural Variant Detection by Large-scale Sequencing Reveals New Evolutionary Evidence on Breed Divergence between Chinese and European Pigs.

Authors:  Pengju Zhao; Junhui Li; Huimin Kang; Haifei Wang; Ziyao Fan; Zongjun Yin; Jiafu Wang; Qin Zhang; Zhiquan Wang; Jian-Feng Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Characterization of a rare mosaic unbalanced translocation of t(3;12) in a patient with neurodevelopmental disorders.

Authors:  Xiaolin Hu; Elizabeth K Baker; Jodie Johnson; Stephanie Balow; Loren D M Pena; Laura K Conlin; Qiaoning Guan; Teresa A Smolarek
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2022-03-05       Impact factor: 2.009

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.