| Literature DB >> 23497053 |
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Over the last fifty years, the number of centenarians has dramatically increased. The centenarian rate (CR) is representative of the general longevity prevalent in a nation; it indicates the number of individuals aged 100 years or above at a given date divided by the size of the corresponding cohort of a given age. Two important attributes of the CR (50-54) are that it reflects both unchanged age-specific fertility and the absence of migration in populations. It can generally be used in longevity-based evaluations of the broader concept of successful ageing. As such, this retrospective analysis of the social factors that contribute to the CR (50-54) may help to identify the factors associated with successful ageing.This study estimates the CR (50-54) and elucidates the influence of social factors on successful ageing and the CR (50-54), examining 32 member countries of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).Entities:
Keywords: Centenarian rate, Expenditure on health, Fixed-telephone, Human development index
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23497053 PMCID: PMC3599594 DOI: 10.1186/1472-698X-13-16
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Int Health Hum Rights ISSN: 1472-698X
Figure 1Description of theoretical framework.
Descriptive statistics of variable
| CR (50–54) | 32 | 34.82 | 22.69 | 1.59 | 116.78 |
| HEGDP | 32 | 8.772 | 0.349 | 4.8 | 15.3 |
| GGEH | 32 | 15.11 | 2.839 | 9.9 | 19.3 |
| FTS | 32 | 42.91 | 12.59 | 18.07 | 63.05 |
| HDI | 32 | 0.876 | 0.046 | 0.7 | 0.94 |
SD: Standard Deviation.
Centenarians rates in 32 OECD Countries
| Japan | 49,457 | 4,235,088 | 116.78 |
| Canada | 603 | 860,932 | 70.04 |
| Switzerland | 218 | 345,347 | 63.12 |
| Australia | 3,367 | 56,535 | 59.56 |
| France | 17,337 | 2,925,417 | 59.26 |
| United States of America | 6,026 | 10,362,197 | 58.15 |
| Israel | 643 | 120,048 | 53.56 |
| Italy | 14,076 | 3,168,199 | 44.43 |
| Iceland | 34 | 7,963 | 42.69 |
| Spain | 6,449 | 1,661,656 | 38.81 |
| New Zealand | 48 | 126,651 | 37.89 |
| Greece | 1,737 | 466,364 | 37.25 |
| United Kingdom | 13,254 | 3,620,392 | 36.61 |
| Denmark | 931 | 294,494 | 31.61 |
| Sweden | 1,608 | 523,308 | 30.73 |
| Netherlands | 1,852 | 629,248 | 29.43 |
| Norway | 663 | 226,386 | 29.29 |
| Estonia | 197 | 75,769 | 26.01 |
| Austria | 13 | 501,994 | 25.89 |
| Belgium | 1,549 | 619,978 | 24.98 |
| Ireland | 39 | 156,295 | 24.95 |
| Germany | 12,682 | 5,365,255 | 23.64 |
| Portugal | 1,054 | 477,505 | 22.07 |
| Finland | 565 | 26,828 | 21.06 |
| Slovenia | 197 | 96,286 | 20.46 |
| Republic of Korea | 1,826 | 90,849 | 20.09 |
| Luxembourg | 38 | 23,513 | 16.16 |
| Poland | 2,683 | 1,676,958 | 15.99 |
| Hungary | 926 | 670,302 | 13.81 |
| Slovakia | 252 | 242,513 | 10.39 |
| Czech Republic | 547 | 6,908 | 7.92 |
| Turkey | 181 | 113,756 | 1.59 |
Figure 2The scatterplots of the social factors for CR (50–54).
Model of prediction variables of social factors for CR (50–54)
| Model 1† | | | | |
| HEGDP | 2.078 | 0.859 | | |
| GGEH | 2.862 | 1.702 | 0.017 | 0.494 |
| Model 2‡ | | | | |
| FTS | 0.561 | 1.635 | | |
| HDI | 151.585 | 1.604 | 0.006 | 0.549 |
| Model 3‡ | | | | |
| HEGDP | 1.161 | 0.481 | | |
| GGEH | 1.181 | 0.624 | | |
| FTS | 0.436 | 1.181 | | |
| HDI | 100.651 | 0.932 | 0.025 | 0.573 |
† Model 1: Expenditure on health.
‡ Model 2: Standard of living & Human relationship (+) Social well-being.
‡ Model 3: Expenditure on health (+) Standard of living & Human relationship (+) Social well-being.