Toby M Maher1. 1. Centre for Respiratory Research, University College London, Rayne Institute, 5 University Street, WC1E 6JJ, UK +0207 679 6975 ; +0207 679 6973 ; t.maher@ucl.ac.uk.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a devastating, progressive condition with a median survival of 2.8 - 4 years from diagnosis. Clinicians confronted with a patient with fibrosing lung disease need to be reliably able to distinguish IPF from other diffuse parenchymal lung diseases. Furthermore, they need to be able to gauge prognosis, evaluate timing of interventions including referral for transplant, assess reliably the effectiveness of treatment and be able to detect rapidly the development of disease complications. OBJECTIVE/ METHOD: This paper provides an overview of currently available diagnostic tests for IPF and its complications and evaluates the possible future role of candidate biomarkers in the diagnosis and assessment of patients with IPF. A literature search was performed for papers evaluating diagnostic tests in the diagnosis of IPF and its complications. CONCLUSION: Computed tomography combined with clinical data is sufficient for diagnosing IPF in approximately two-thirds of patients with the condition. For the remaining patients, histological assessment is important in achieving a precise diagnosis. Serial measurements of carbon monoxide diffusing capacity and forced vital capacity provide the best prognostic indicator in IPF. Potential biomarkers for diagnosing IPF include KL-6, MMP1 and MMP7. Brain naturetic peptide shows promise as a non-invasive screening tool for the diagnosis of IPF-associated pulmonary hypertension.
BACKGROUND:Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a devastating, progressive condition with a median survival of 2.8 - 4 years from diagnosis. Clinicians confronted with a patient with fibrosing lung disease need to be reliably able to distinguish IPF from other diffuse parenchymal lung diseases. Furthermore, they need to be able to gauge prognosis, evaluate timing of interventions including referral for transplant, assess reliably the effectiveness of treatment and be able to detect rapidly the development of disease complications. OBJECTIVE/ METHOD: This paper provides an overview of currently available diagnostic tests for IPF and its complications and evaluates the possible future role of candidate biomarkers in the diagnosis and assessment of patients with IPF. A literature search was performed for papers evaluating diagnostic tests in the diagnosis of IPF and its complications. CONCLUSION: Computed tomography combined with clinical data is sufficient for diagnosing IPF in approximately two-thirds of patients with the condition. For the remaining patients, histological assessment is important in achieving a precise diagnosis. Serial measurements of carbon monoxide diffusing capacity and forced vital capacity provide the best prognostic indicator in IPF. Potential biomarkers for diagnosing IPF include KL-6, MMP1 and MMP7. Brain naturetic peptide shows promise as a non-invasive screening tool for the diagnosis of IPF-associated pulmonary hypertension.
Authors: Philip L Molyneaux; Michael J Cox; Athol U Wells; Ho Cheol Kim; Wonjun Ji; William O C Cookson; Miriam F Moffatt; Dong Soon Kim; Toby M Maher Journal: Respir Res Date: 2017-02-01