Literature DB >> 23496258

Why carers of people with dementia do not utilise out-of-home respite services.

Lyn Phillipson1, Christopher Magee, Sandra C Jones.   

Abstract

While many people with dementia require institutional care, having a co-resident carer improves the likelihood that people can live at home. Although caregiving can have positive aspects, carers still report a high need for respite. Despite this need, the use of respite services for carers of people with dementia is often low. This article investigates carer beliefs regarding out-of-home respite services and why some carers do not utilise them. A total of 152/294 (51.7%) carers of community-dwelling people with dementia (NSW, Australia) who were sent a survey completed it (November 2009-January 2010). Despite reporting unmet need for both services, 44.2% of those surveyed were not utilising day respite and 60.2% were not utilising residential respite programmes. Binary logistic regression models were used to examine factors associated with non-use using the Theory of Planned Behaviour within an expanded Andersen Behavioural Model on a final sample of 113 (due to missing data). The model explained 66.9% of the variation for day centres, and 42% for residential respite services. Beliefs that service use would result in negative outcomes for the care recipient were strongly associated with non-use of both day care [OR 13.11; 95% CI (3.75, 45.89)] and residential respite care [OR 6.13; 95% CI (2.02, 18.70)] and were more strongly associated with service non-use than other predisposing, impeding and need variables. For some carers who used services despite negative outcome beliefs, the benefits of respite service use may also be diminished. To improve use of out-of-home respite services in this vulnerable group, service beliefs should be addressed through service development and promotion that emphasises benefits for both carer and care recipients. Future research utilising behavioural service models may also be improved via the inclusion of service beliefs in the study of health and social service use.
© 2013 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23496258     DOI: 10.1111/hsc.12030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Soc Care Community        ISSN: 0966-0410


  8 in total

Review 1.  The Valuation of Informal Care in Cost-of-Illness Studies: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Juan Oliva-Moreno; Marta Trapero-Bertran; Luz Maria Peña-Longobardo; Raúl Del Pozo-Rubio
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Why carers use adult day respite: a mixed method case study.

Authors:  Christine M Stirling; Corinna A Dwan; Angela R McKenzie
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 3.  Barriers and enablers in the use of respite interventions by caregivers of people with dementia: an integrative review.

Authors:  Marie-Conception Leocadie; Marie-Hélène Roy; Monique Rothan-Tondeur
Journal:  Arch Public Health       Date:  2018-11-22

4.  Knowledge, help-seeking and efficacy to find respite services: an exploratory study in help-seeking carers of people with dementia in the context of aged care reforms.

Authors:  L Phillipson; K Johnson; E Cridland; D Hall; C Neville; E Fielding; H Hasan
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 3.921

Review 5.  Synthesis of the Literature: Variables Influencing Caregiver Use or Nonuse of Supportive Services.

Authors:  Kristina M Childers
Journal:  SAGE Open Nurs       Date:  2019-05-03

6.  What is the relationship between people with dementia and their caregiver's illness perceptions post-diagnosis and the impact on help-seeking behaviour? A systematic review.

Authors:  Jane E Gregg; Jane Simpson; Ramin Nilforooshan; Guillermo Perez-Algorta
Journal:  Dementia (London)       Date:  2021-03-31

Review 7.  Key stakeholders' experiences of respite services for people with dementia and their perspectives on respite service development: a qualitative systematic review.

Authors:  Emma O' Shea; Suzanne Timmons; Eamon O' Shea; Siobhan Fox; Kate Irving
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 3.921

Review 8.  Influences on the access to and use of formal community care by people with dementia and their informal caregivers: a scoping review.

Authors:  Anja Bieber; Natalie Nguyen; Gabriele Meyer; Astrid Stephan
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 2.655

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.