Literature DB >> 23496077

Model-based drug development applied to oncology.

Jeffrey S Barrett1, Manish Gupta, John T Mondick.   

Abstract

Model-based drug development (MBDD) is an approach that is used to organize the vast and complex data streams that feed the drug development pipelines of small molecule and biotechnology sponsors. Such data streams are ultimately reviewed by the global regulatory community as evidence of a drug's potential to treat and/or harm patients. Some of this information is captured in the scientific literature and prescribing compendiums forming the basis of how new and existing agents will ultimately be administered and further evaluated in the broader patient community. As this data stream evolves, the details of data qualification, the assumptions and/or critical decisions based on these data are lost under conventional drug development paradigms. MBDD relies on the construction of quantitative relationships to connect data from discrete experiments conducted along the drug development pathway. These relationships are then used to ask questions relevant at critical development stages, hopefully, with the understanding that the various scenarios explored represent a path to optimal decision making. Oncology, as a therapeutic area, presents a unique set of challenges and perhaps a different development paradigm as opposed to other disease targets. The poor attrition of development compounds in the recent past attests to these difficulties and provides an incentive for a different approach. In addition, given the reliance on multimodal therapy, oncological disease targets are often treated with both new and older agents spanning several drug classes. As MBDD becomes more integrated into the pharmaceutical research community, a more rational explanation for decisions regarding the development of new oncology agents as well as the proposed treatment regimens that incorporate both new and existing agents can be expected. Hopefully, the end result is a more focussed clinical development programme, which ultimately provides a means to optimize individual patient care.

Entities:  

Year:  2007        PMID: 23496077     DOI: 10.1517/17460441.2.2.185

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Discov        ISSN: 1746-0441            Impact factor:   6.098


  5 in total

Review 1.  The use of clinical utility assessments in early clinical development.

Authors:  Anis A Khan; Itay Perlstein; Rajesh Krishna
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2009-01-16       Impact factor: 4.009

2.  Translational Framework Predicting Tumour Response in Gemcitabine-Treated Patients with Advanced Pancreatic and Ovarian Cancer from Xenograft Studies.

Authors:  Maria Garcia-Cremades; Celine Pitou; Philip W Iversen; Iñaki F Troconiz
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 4.009

3.  Modeling NSCLC progression: recent advances and opportunities available.

Authors:  Ahmed Abbas Suleiman; Lucia Nogova; Uwe Fuhr
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 4.009

4.  PK/PD Mediated Dose Optimization of Emactuzumab, a CSF1R Inhibitor, in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors and Diffuse-Type Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor.

Authors:  Kevin Smart; Ann-Marie Bröske; Dominik Rüttinger; Claudia Mueller; Alex Phipps; Antje-Christine Walz; Carola Ries; Monika Baehner; Michael Cannarile; Georgina Meneses-Lorente
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 6.875

5.  Comparative Effects of CT Imaging Measurement on RECIST End Points and Tumor Growth Kinetics Modeling.

Authors:  C H Li; R R Bies; Y Wang; M R Sharma; S Karovic; L Werk; M J Edelman; A A Miller; E E Vokes; A Oto; M J Ratain; L H Schwartz; M L Maitland
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 4.689

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.