Literature DB >> 23496013

Effect of marker-data editing on the accuracy of genomic prediction.

V Edriss1, B Guldbrandtsen, M S Lund, G Su.   

Abstract

Genomic selection is a method to predict breeding values using genome-wide single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers. High-quality marker data are necessary for genomic selection. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of marker-editing criteria on the accuracy of genomic predictions in the Nordic Holstein and Jersey populations. Data included 4429 Holstein and 1071 Jersey bulls. In total, 48,222 SNP for Holstein and 44,305 SNP for Jersey were polymorphic. The SNP data were edited based on (i) minor allele frequencies (MAF) with thresholds of no limit, 0.001, 0.01, 0.02, 0.05 and 0.10, (ii) deviations from Hardy-Weinberg proportions (HWP) with thresholds of no limit, chi-squared p-values of 0.001, 0.02, 0.05 and 0.10, and (iii) GenCall (GC) scores with thresholds of 0.15, 0.55, 0.60, 0.65 and 0.70. The marker data sets edited with different criteria were used for genomic prediction of protein yield, fertility and mastitis using a Bayesian variable selection and a GBLUP model. De-regressed EBV were used as response variables. The result showed little difference between prediction accuracies based on marker data sets edited with MAF and deviation from HWP. However, accuracy decreased with more stringent thresholds of GC score. According to the results of this study, it would be appropriate to edit data with restriction of MAF being between 0.01 and 0.02, a p-value of deviation from HWP being 0.05, and keeping all individual SNP genotypes having a GC score over 0.15.
© 2012 Blackwell Verlag GmbH.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23496013     DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2012.01015.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Breed Genet        ISSN: 0931-2668            Impact factor:   2.380


  7 in total

1.  Beef cattle body temperature during climatic stress: a genome-wide association study.

Authors:  Jeremy T Howard; Stephen D Kachman; Warren M Snelling; E John Pollak; Daniel C Ciobanu; Larry A Kuehn; Matthew L Spangler
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2013-12-22       Impact factor: 3.787

2.  The effect of rare alleles on estimated genomic relationships from whole genome sequence data.

Authors:  Sonia E Eynard; Jack J Windig; Grégoire Leroy; Rianne van Binsbergen; Mario P L Calus
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 2.797

3.  Improving genomic predictions by correction of genotypes from genotyping by sequencing in livestock populations.

Authors:  Xiao Wang; Mogens Sandø Lund; Peipei Ma; Luc Janss; Haja N Kadarmideen; Guosheng Su
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2019-01-24

4.  Comparisons of improved genomic predictions generated by different imputation methods for genotyping by sequencing data in livestock populations.

Authors:  Xiao Wang; Guosheng Su; Dan Hao; Mogens Sandø Lund; Haja N Kadarmideen
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2020-01-07

5.  Genomic Prediction for Grain Yield and Yield-Related Traits in Chinese Winter Wheat.

Authors:  Mohsin Ali; Yong Zhang; Awais Rasheed; Jiankang Wang; Luyan Zhang
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Genome-wide discovery of natural variation in pre-mRNA splicing and prioritising causal alternative splicing to salt stress response in rice.

Authors:  Huihui Yu; Qian Du; Malachy Campbell; Bin Yu; Harkamal Walia; Chi Zhang
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2021-02-14       Impact factor: 10.151

7.  Rice diversity panel provides accurate genomic predictions for complex traits in the progenies of biparental crosses involving members of the panel.

Authors:  M Ben Hassen; T V Cao; J Bartholomé; G Orasen; C Colombi; J Rakotomalala; L Razafinimpiasa; C Bertone; C Biselli; A Volante; F Desiderio; L Jacquin; G Valè; N Ahmadi
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 5.699

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.