Literature DB >> 23495696

The relationship between phenotypic variation among offspring and mother body mass in wild boar: evidence of coin-flipping?

Marlène Gamelon1, Jean-Michel Gaillard, Eric Baubet, Sébastien Devillard, Ludovic Say, Serge Brandt, Olivier Gimenez.   

Abstract

1. In highly variable environments, the optimal reproductive tactics of iteroparous organisms should minimize variance in yearly reproductive success to maximize the long-term average reproductive success. To minimize among-year variation in reproductive success, individuals can either minimize the variance in the number of offspring produced at each reproductive attempt (classical bet-hedging) or maximize the phenotypic diversity of offspring produced within or among reproductive attempts (coin-flipping). 2. From a long-term detailed study of an intensively exploited population facing a highly unpredictable environment, we identify a continuum of reproductive tactics in wild boar females depending on their body mass. 3. At one end, light females adjusted litter size to their body mass and produced highly similar-sized offspring within a litter. These females fitted the hypothesis of individual optimization commonly reported in warm-blooded species, which involves both an optimal mass and an optimal number of offspring for a given mother. At the other end of the continuum, heavy females produced litters of variable size including a mixture of heavy and light offspring within litters. 4. Prolific heavy wild boar females diversify the phenotype of their offspring, providing a first evidence for coin-flipping in a warm-blooded species.
© 2013 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2013 British Ecological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Sus scrofa scrofa; bet‐hedging; mammal; phenotypic plasticity; reproductive tactic

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23495696     DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  6 in total

1.  Fluctuating food resources influence developmental plasticity in wild boar.

Authors:  Marlène Gamelon; Mathieu Douhard; Eric Baubet; Olivier Gimenez; Serge Brandt; Jean-Michel Gaillard
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Size of nest-cavity entrance influences male attractiveness and paternal provisioning in house wrens.

Authors:  Darren S Will; Erin E Dorset; Charles F Thompson; Scott K Sakaluk; E Keith Bowers
Journal:  J Zool (1987)       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 2.322

3.  Offspring mass variation in tree swallows: A case of bet-hedging?

Authors:  Philippine Gossieaux; Martin Leclerc; Joanie Van de Walle; Yoanna Poisson; Pauline Toni; Julie Landes; Audrey Bourret; Dany Garant; Fanie Pelletier; Marc Bélisle
Journal:  Ecosphere       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 3.593

4.  Reproduction of Pisidium casertanum (Poli, 1791) in Arctic lake.

Authors:  Yulia Bespalaya; Ivan Bolotov; Olga Aksenova; Alexander Kondakov; Inga Paltser; Mikhail Gofarov
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 2.963

5.  How climate change and wildlife management affect population structure in wild boars.

Authors:  Claudia Bieber; Thomas Ruf; Sebastian G Vetter; Zsófia Puskas
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Influence of intrinsic and extrinsic attributes on neonate survival in an invasive large mammal.

Authors:  Sarah M Chinn; John C Kilgo; Mark A Vukovich; James C Beasley
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.