Literature DB >> 23495638

Floral diversity increases beneficial arthropod richness and decreases variability in arthropod community composition.

Ashley B Bennett1, Claudio Gratton.   

Abstract

Declines in species diversity resulting from anthropogenic alterations of the environment heighten the need to develop management strategies that conserve species and ecosystem services. This study examined how native plant species and their diversity influence the abundance and richness of beneficial arthropods, a functionally important group that provides ecosystem services such as pollination and natural pest suppression. Beneficial arthropods were sampled in replicated study plots containing native perennials planted in one-, two-, and seven-species mixtures. We found plant diversity had a positive impact on arthropod richness but not on arthropod abundance. An analysis of arthropod community composition revealed that each flower species attracted a different assemblage of beneficial arthropods. In addition, the full seven-species mixture also attracted a distinct arthropod community compared to single-species monocultures. Using a multivariate approach, we determined whether arthropod assemblages in two- and seven-species plots were additive and could be predicted based on assemblages from their component single-species plots. On average, assemblages in diverse plots were nonadditive when compared to assemblages predicted using single-species plots. Arthropod assemblages in two-species plots most closely resembled those of only one of the flower species in the mixture. However, the arthropod assemblages in seven-species plots, although statistically deviating from the expectation of an additive model, more closely resembled predicted communities compared to the assemblages found in two-species plots, suggesting that variability in arthropod community composition decreased as planting diversity increased. Our study demonstrates that careful selection of plants in managed landscapes can augment beneficial arthropod richness and support a more predictable arthropod community, suggesting that planning and design efforts could shape arthropod assemblages in natural as well as managed landscapes to meet targeted conservation or management goals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23495638     DOI: 10.1890/11-2029.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  4 in total

1.  Landscape and local site variables differentially influence pollinators and pollination services in urban agricultural sites.

Authors:  Ashley B Bennett; Sarah Lovell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Sweeping beauty: is grassland arthropod community composition effectively estimated by sweep netting?

Authors:  Ryan D Spafford; Christopher J Lortie
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 2.912

3.  Beneficial Insect Attraction to Milkweeds (Asclepias speciosa, Asclepias fascicularis) in Washington State, USA.

Authors:  David G James; Lorraine Seymour; Gerry Lauby; Katie Buckley
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 2.769

4.  Sown Wildflowers Enhance Habitats of Pollinators and Beneficial Arthropods in a Tomato Field Margin.

Authors:  Vaya Kati; Filitsa Karamaouna; Leonidas Economou; Photini V Mylona; Maria Samara; Mircea-Dan Mitroiu; Myrto Barda; Mike Edwards; Sofia Liberopoulou
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-17
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.