Literature DB >> 23495636

Using habitat suitability models to target invasive plant species surveys.

Alycia W Crall1, Catherine S Jarnevich, Brendon Panke, Nick Young, Mark Renz, Jeffrey Morisette.   

Abstract

Managers need new tools for detecting the movement and spread of nonnative, invasive species. Habitat suitability models are a popular tool for mapping the potential distribution of current invaders, but the ability of these models to prioritize monitoring efforts has not been tested in the field. We tested the utility of an iterative sampling design (i.e., models based on field observations used to guide subsequent field data collection to improve the model), hypothesizing that model performance would increase when new data were gathered from targeted sampling using criteria based on the initial model results. We also tested the ability of habitat suitability models to predict the spread of invasive species, hypothesizing that models would accurately predict occurrences in the field, and that the use of targeted sampling would detect more species with less sampling effort than a nontargeted approach. We tested these hypotheses on two species at the state scale (Centaurea stoebe and Pastinaca sativa) in Wisconsin (USA), and one genus at the regional scale (Tamarix) in the western United States. These initial data were merged with environmental data at 30-m2 resolution for Wisconsin and 1-km2 resolution for the western United States to produce our first iteration models. We stratified these initial models to target field sampling and compared our models and success at detecting our species of interest to other surveys being conducted during the same field season (i.e., nontargeted sampling). Although more data did not always improve our models based on correct classification rate (CCR), sensitivity, specificity, kappa, or area under the curve (AUC), our models generated from targeted sampling data always performed better than models generated from nontargeted data. For Wisconsin species, the model described actual locations in the field fairly well (kappa = 0.51, 0.19, P < 0.01), and targeted sampling did detect more species than nontargeted sampling with less sampling effort (chi2 = 47.42, P < 0.01). From these findings, we conclude that habitat suitability models can be highly useful tools for guiding invasive species monitoring, and we support the use of an iterative sampling design for guiding such efforts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23495636     DOI: 10.1890/12-0465.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  9 in total

1.  Integrating subsistence practice and species distribution modeling: assessing invasive elodea's potential impact on Native Alaskan subsistence of Chinook salmon and whitefish.

Authors:  Matthew W Luizza; Paul H Evangelista; Catherine S Jarnevich; Amanda West; Heather Stewart
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Can species distribution models really predict the expansion of invasive species?

Authors:  Morgane Barbet-Massin; Quentin Rome; Claire Villemant; Franck Courchamp
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Pollen sleuthing for terrestrial plant surveys: Locating plant populations by exploiting pollen movement.

Authors:  Lesley G Campbell; Stephanie J Melles; Eric Vaz; Rebecca J Parker; Kevin S Burgess
Journal:  Appl Plant Sci       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 1.936

4.  Modeling the distributions of tegu lizards in native and potential invasive ranges.

Authors:  Catherine S Jarnevich; Mark A Hayes; Lee A Fitzgerald; Amy A Yackel Adams; Bryan G Falk; Michelle A M Collier; Lea' R Bonewell; Page E Klug; Sergio Naretto; Robert N Reed
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Experimental evidence of chemical attraction in the mutualistic zebra mussel-killer shrimp system.

Authors:  Matteo Rolla; Sofia Consuegra; Eleanor Carrington; David J Hall; Carlos Garcia de Leaniz
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  INHABIT: A web-based decision support tool for invasive plant species habitat visualization and assessment across the contiguous United States.

Authors:  Peder Engelstad; Catherine S Jarnevich; Terri Hogan; Helen R Sofaer; Ian S Pearse; Jennifer L Sieracki; Neil Frakes; Julia Sullivan; Nicholas E Young; Janet S Prevéy; Pairsa Belamaric; Jillian LaRoe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  An iterative and targeted sampling design informed by habitat suitability models for detecting focal plant species over extensive areas.

Authors:  Ophelia Wang; Luke J Zachmann; Steven E Sesnie; Aaryn D Olsson; Brett G Dickson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Species distribution model transferability and model grain size - finer may not always be better.

Authors:  Syed Amir Manzoor; Geoffrey Griffiths; Martin Lukac
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  A modeling workflow that balances automation and human intervention to inform invasive plant management decisions at multiple spatial scales.

Authors:  Nicholas E Young; Catherine S Jarnevich; Helen R Sofaer; Ian Pearse; Julia Sullivan; Peder Engelstad; Thomas J Stohlgren
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.