Literature DB >> 23493957

Fast-track program in laparoscopic liver surgery: Theory or fact?

Belinda Sánchez-Pérez1, José Manuel Aranda-Narváez, Miguel Angel Suárez-Muñoz, Moises Eladel-Delfresno, José Luis Fernández-Aguilar, Jose Antonio Pérez-Daga, Ysabel Pulido-Roa, Julio Santoyo-Santoyo.   

Abstract

AIM: To analyze our results after the introduction of a fast-track (FT) program after laparoscopic liver surgery in our Hepatobiliarypancreatic Unit.
METHODS: All patients (43) undergoing laparoscopic liver surgery between March 2004 and March 2010 were included and divided into two consecutive groups: Control group (CG) from March 2004 until December 2006 with traditional perioperative cares (17 patients) and fast-track group (FTG) from January 2007 until March 2010 with FT program cares (26 patients). Primary endpoint was the influence of the program on the postoperative stay, the amount of re-admissions, morbidity and mortality. Secondarily we considered duration of surgery, use of drains, conversion to open surgery, intensive cares needs and transfusion.
RESULTS: Both groups were homogeneous in age and sex. No differences in technique, time of surgery or conversion to open surgery were found, but more malignant diseases were operated in the FTG, and then transfusions were higher in FTG. Readmissions and morbidity were similar in both groups, without mortality. Postoperative stay was similar, with a median of 3 for CG vs 2.5 for FTG. However, the 80.8% of patients from FTG left the hospital within the first 3 d after surgery (58.8% for CG).
CONCLUSION: The introduction of a FT program after laparoscopic liver surgery improves the recovery of patients without increasing complications or re-admissions, which leads to a reduction of the stay and costs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fast-track; Laparoscopy; Liver surgery

Year:  2012        PMID: 23493957      PMCID: PMC3596505          DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v4.i11.246

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg


  18 in total

1.  Early oral nutrition after elective colorectal surgery: influence of balanced analgesia and enforced mobilization.

Authors:  Morten Gaarden Henriksen; Henriette V Hansen; Ib Hessov
Journal:  Nutrition       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.008

2.  Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  N S Abraham; J M Young; M J Solomon
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Evidence-based value of prophylactic drainage in gastrointestinal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analyses.

Authors:  Henrik Petrowsky; Nicolas Demartines; Valentin Rousson; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 4.  Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation.

Authors:  H Kehlet
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 9.166

5.  Effect of salt and water balance on recovery of gastrointestinal function after elective colonic resection: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Dileep N Lobo; Kate A Bostock; Keith R Neal; Alan C Perkins; Brian J Rowlands; Simon P Allison
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-05-25       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Laparoscopic liver resection: results for 70 patients.

Authors:  I Dagher; J M Proske; A Carloni; H Richa; H Tranchart; D Franco
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-02-08       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Laparoscopic liver resection for malignant liver tumors: preliminary results of a multicenter European study.

Authors:  Jean-François Gigot; David Glineur; Juan Santiago Azagra; Martine Goergen; Marc Ceuterick; Mario Morino; José Etienne; Jacques Marescaux; Didier Mutter; Ludo van Krunckelsven; Bernard Descottes; Dominique Valleix; François Lachachi; Claude Bertrand; Baudouin Mansvelt; Guy Hubens; Jean-Pierre Saey; Romain Schockmel
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 8.  Laparoscopic vs open hepatic resection: a comparative study.

Authors:  M Morino; I Morra; E Rosso; C Miglietta; C Garrone
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-10-28       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Implementation of the scientific evidence into daily practice--example from fast-track colonic cancer surgery.

Authors:  J Hammer; H Harling; P Wille-Jørgensen
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-03-03       Impact factor: 3.788

10.  Application of fibrin glue sealant after hepatectomy does not seem justified: results of a randomized study in 300 patients.

Authors:  Juan Figueras; Laura Llado; Mónica Miro; Emilio Ramos; Jaume Torras; Juan Fabregat; Teresa Serrano
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  19 in total

1.  Is current perioperative practice in hepatic surgery based on enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) principles?

Authors:  E M Wong-Lun-Hing; R M van Dam; L A Heijnen; O R C Busch; T Terkivatan; R van Hillegersberg; G D Slooter; J Klaase; J H W de Wilt; K Bosscha; U P Neumann; B Topal; L A Aldrighetti; C H C Dejong
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Enhanced Recovery via Peripheral Nerve Block for Open Hepatectomy.

Authors:  Lucas W Thornblade; Yongwoo D Seo; Tracy Kwan; Jane H Cardoso; Eric Pan; Gregory Dembo; Raymond S W Yeung; James O Park
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 3.  Fast-Track Programs for Liver Surgery: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Si-Jia Wu; Xian-Ze Xiong; Jiong Lu; Yao Cheng; Yi-Xin Lin; Rong-Xing Zhou; Nan-Sheng Cheng
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 4.  Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Programs for Liver Resection: a Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Cheng Wang; Guoqun Zheng; Wenlong Zhang; Fabiao Zhang; Shangdong Lv; Aidong Wang; Zheping Fang
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  The effect of enhanced recovery program for patients undergoing partial laparoscopic hepatectomy of liver cancer.

Authors:  F He; X Lin; F Xie; Y Huang; R Yuan
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 6.  Enhanced recovery following liver surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michael J Hughes; Stephen McNally; Stephen J Wigmore
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 3.647

7.  Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Programs for Laparoscopic Abdominal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhengyan Li; Qingchuan Zhao; Bin Bai; Gang Ji; Yezhou Liu
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Enhanced recovery care versus traditional care after laparoscopic liver resections: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Xiao Liang; Hanning Ying; Hongwei Wang; Hongxia Xu; Minjun Liu; Haiyan Zhou; Huiqing Ge; Wenbin Jiang; Lijun Feng; Hui Liu; Yingchun Zhang; Zhiying Mao; Jianhua Li; Bo Shen; Yuelong Liang; Xiujun Cai
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Impact of enhanced recovery after surgery protocols on postoperative morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing routine hepatectomy: review of the current evidence.

Authors:  Rahul Damania; Andrei Cocieru
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-09

10.  Safety and feasibility of an enhanced recovery pathway after a liver resection: prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Bobby V M Dasari; Rasha Rahman; Shakeeb Khan; Davinia Bennett; James Hodson; John Isaac; Ravi Marudanayagam; Darius F Mirza; Paolo Muiesan; Keith J Roberts; Robert P Sutcliffe
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 3.647

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.