| Literature DB >> 23493786 |
Yilei Zhao1, Chen Wang, Jianwei Wu, Yan Wang, Wenliang Zhu, Yong Zhang, Zhimin Du.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although inadequate intake of essential nutrient choline has been known to significantly increase cardiovascular risk, whether additional supplement of choline offering a protection against cardiac hypertrophy remain unstudied.Entities:
Keywords: Calcineurin.; cardiac hypertrophy; cardiomyocyte; choline; miR-133a
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23493786 PMCID: PMC3596715 DOI: 10.7150/ijbs.5976
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Biol Sci ISSN: 1449-2288 Impact factor: 6.580
Figure 1Effects of choline on TAC-induced cardiac hypertrophy. (A) Comparison of HW/BW and LVW/BW. Sham (n = 9); TAC (n = 10); TAC + Choline (n = 11); TAC + Choline + 4-DAMP (n = 8). **p < 0.01 vs sham; #p < 0.05 vs TAC. (B) Representative H&E staining of heart trans-section in the four experimental groups. (C) Echocardiographic characteristics of mice in each group. LVPWS: left ventricular posterior systolic wall thickness; IVSTS: interventricular septal systolic thickness; (n = 5), **p < 0.01 vs Sham; ##p < 0.01 vs TAC; &&p < 0.01 vs TAC+Choline. (D) Effects of choline on the mRNA expression of β-MHC in the hypertrophic left ventricular tissue. **p < 0.01 vs Sham; ##p < 0.01 vs TAC. (E) Effects of choline on the protein expression of β-MHC in the hypertrophic left ventricular tissue. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM for 3-4 individual experiments; **p < 0.01 vs Sham; ##p < 0.01 vs TAC.
Figure 2Effects of choline on ISO-induced cardiomyocytes hypertrophy. (A) Representative immunofluorescence staining of cardiomyocytes was observed (×200) with α-actinin antibody (red signal) and nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue signal). (B) Statistical analysis of cell surface area. Ctrl (n = 133); ISO (n = 110); Choline+ISO (n = 121); 4-DAMP+Choline+ISO (n = 100). **p < 0.01 vs Ctrl; ##p < 0.01 vs ISO; &p < 0.05 vs Choline+ISO (C) Regulation of the mRNA expression of β-MHC. **p < 0.01 vs Ctrl; ##p < 0.01 vs ISO. (D) Representative western blot of β-MHC protein in vitro. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM for 3-4 individual experiments; **p < 0.01 vs Ctrl; ##p < 0.01 vs ISO; &&p < 0.01 vs Choline+ISO.
Figure 3Effects of choline on miR-133a and calcineurin expression. (A) Expression of miR-133a was increased by choline in vivo (left panel) and in vitro (right panel). *p < 0.05 vs Sham-Ctrl; ##p < 0.01 vs TAC-ISO; &&p < 0.05 vs TAC+Choline -Choline+ISO; (B) Inhibitory effects of choline on the expression of calcineurin in cardiac tissue (left panel) and cardiomyocytes (right panel). Data are expressed as mean ± SEM for 3-4 individual experiments; **p < 0.01 vs Sham-Ctrl; ##p < 0.01 vs TAC; #p < 0.05 vs ISO; &p < 0.05 vs TAC+Choline -Choline+ISO.
Figure 4Results of network analysis. Red nodes represent the choline-associated proteins; deep blue and green nodes represent its receptor M3 mAChR and the downstream proteins of M3 mAChR, respectively; light nodes represent the proteins encoded by cardiac hypertrophy related genes; edges represent experimentally validated protein-protein interactions. CHRM3: cholinergic receptor, muscarinic 3; MYC: myelocytomatosis oncogene; BNDF: brain-derived neurotrophic factor; INS: insulin; IGF2: insulin-like growth factor 2; GNAQ: guanine nucleotide binding protein (G protein), q polypeptide; GPRASP1: G protein-coupled receptor associated sorting protein 1; MRPS22: mitochondrial ribosomal protein S22; ESR1: estrogen receptor 1; IGF1R: insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor; IGFBP1/3: insulin-like growth factor binding protein 1/3; TCAP: titin-cap; AGTR1: angiotensin II receptor, type 1; RAF1: v-raf-leukemia viral oncogene 1; AR: androgen receptor; NOS3: nitric oxide synthase 3.