| Literature DB >> 23493667 |
Ali Mohammad Alizadeh1, Hamid Sohanaki, Mahmod Khaniki, Mohammad Ali Mohaghgheghi, Giti Ghmami, Maryamsadat Mosavi.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Wound healing represents a dynamic physiological process influenced by many factors. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of Teucrium polium honey on the wound healing and tensile strength in rat.Entities:
Keywords: Honey; Rat; Teucrium polium; Wound excision; Wound incision
Year: 2011 PMID: 23493667 PMCID: PMC3586860
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Iran J Basic Med Sci ISSN: 2008-3866 Impact factor: 2.699
The percentage of wound healing area in the incision and the excision wounds on different days
| Days | 0 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 12 | 15 | 18 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Groups | |||||||
| ET | 0 | 16.3±1.5 | c 48.1±4 | b 70.3±3 | c 94±1 | 100 | |
| IC | 0 | 10±1.4 | 31.7±0.6 | 47.6±3.1 | 73±2.6 | 100 | |
| IT | 0 | 18.6±4 | a 61 ±3.3 | a 93±9.4 | c 98±2 | 100 | |
| EC | 0 | 10±1.4 | 27.1±2 | 53.7±2.7 | 70.1±3.8 | 88±4 | 100 |
Data are expressed as mean±SEM. aP< 0.05, bP< 0.01 and cP< 0.001 vs. control group. IC: The incision wound of control group, IT: The incision wound of treated group, EC: The excision wound of control group, ET: The excision wound of treated group.
Histopathological parameters in the incision and the excision wounds on different days
| ParameterSample | Epidermization | Granulation | Collagenization | Fibrinoleukocytic inflammation | Hyperemia/congestion & hemorrhage | Organization of dermis | Presence of skin adnexa |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IT3 | ++ | 0 | ++ | 0 | 0 | +++ | ++ |
| EC1 | 0 | ± | 0 | ++ | ++ | 0 | 0 |
| EC2 | ± | ++ | ± | + | + | ± | 0 |
| EC3 | + | + | + | + | ++ | ++ | ± |
| ET1 | 0 | ± | ± | ++ | ++ | ± | 0 |
| ET2 | + | ++ | + | ± | ± | + | 0 |
| ET3 | ++ | ± | ++ | 0 | 0 | ++ | + |
| IC1 | 0 | + | 0 | ++ | + | 0 | 0 |
| IC2 | ± | ± | ± | + | ± | ± | 0 |
| IC3 | + | 0 | + | ± | ± | ++ | ± |
| IT1 | ± | ± | ± | + | + | ± | 0 |
| IT2 | ± | ± | + | ± | ± | + | ± |
Qualitative differences of histopathological parameters are depicted in details on different days: 0; nil, ±; slight, +; low, ++; high. IC; Incision wound control group, IT; Incision wound treated group, EC; Excision wound control group, ET; Excision wound treated group. Indices 1, 2 and 3 indicate days 4, 8, and 12, respectively.
Figure 1.A feature of incision wound on day 12. A: Treated group, B: Control group (X250, H & E).
Figure 2.A feature of excision wound on day 12. A: Treated group, B: Control group (X250, H & E).
Figure 3.Schematic diagram of fracture energy in incision wound on day 18. Data are expressed as mean±SEM. Stress: Maximum force tensile leading to skin rupture, Strain: Tissue length under maximum tension, Fracture energy: Stress-strain AUC. P< 0.05 vs. control group.
Figure 4.Schematic diagram of fracture energy in excision wound on day 18. Data are expressed as mean±SEM. Stress: Maximum force tensile leading to skin rupture, Strain: Tissue length under maximum tension, Fracture energy: Stress-strain AUC. P< 0.05 vs. control group.