Literature DB >> 23493335

Predictive and prognostic biomarkers with therapeutic targets in breast, colorectal, and non-small cell lung cancers: a systemic review of current development, evidence, and recommendation.

Clement Chung1, Matthew Christianson.   

Abstract

Appropriate evidence-based roles of prognostic and predictive biomarkers of known therapeutic targets in breast, colorectal, and non-small cell lung cancers in adults are reviewed, with summary of evidence for use and recommendation. Current development in biomarker studies is also discussed. Computerized literature searches of PubMed (National Library of Medicine), the Cochrane Collaboration Library, and commonly accepted US and international guidelines (American Society of Clinical Oncology, European Society for Medical Oncology, and National Comprehensive Cancer Network) were performed from 2001 to 2012. Literature published before 2001 was noted for historical interest but not evaluated. Literature review was focused on available systematic reviews and meta-analyses of published predictive (associated with treatment response and/or efficacy) and prognostic (associated with disease outcome) biomarkers of known therapeutic targets in colorectal, breast, and non-small cell lung cancers. In general, significant health outcomes (e.g. predicted response to therapy, overall survival, disease-free survival, quality of life, lesser toxicity, and cost-effectiveness) were used for making recommendations. Four breast cancer biomarkers were evaluated, two of which (2D6 genotyping, Oncotype Dx) were considered emerging with insufficient evidence. Seven colorectal cancer biomarkers were evaluated, five of which (EGFR gene expression, K-ras G13D gene mutation, B-raf V600E gene mutation, dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency, and UGT1A1 genotyping) were considered emerging. Seven non-small cell lung cancer biomarkers were evaluated, five of which were emerging (EGFR gene expression, ERCC gene expression, RRM1 gene expression, K-ras gene mutation, and TS gene expression). Of all 18 biomarkers evaluated, the following showed evidence of clinical utility and were recommended for routine use in practice: ER/PR and HER2 for breast cancer; K-ras gene mutation (except G13D gene mutation) for colorectal cancer; mismatch repair deficiency or microsatellite instability for colorectal cancer; and EGFR and EML4-ALK gene mutations for non-small cell lung. Not all recommendations for these biomarkers were uniformly supported by all guidelines.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Predictive biomarkers; evidence-based review; oncology

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23493335     DOI: 10.1177/1078155212474047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oncol Pharm Pract        ISSN: 1078-1552            Impact factor:   1.809


  19 in total

1.  The Effect of Treatment Advances on the Mortality Results of Breast Cancer Screening Trials: A Microsimulation Model.

Authors:  Jeanette Birnbaum; Vijayakrishna K Gadi; Elan Markowitz; Ruth Etzioni
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Association of CYP2D6*10 (c.100C>T) polymorphisms with clinical outcome of breast cancer after tamoxifen adjuvant endocrine therapy in Chinese population.

Authors:  Lei Lei; Xian Wang; Xiao-Dan Wu; Zeng Wang; Zhan-Hong Chen; Ya-Bin Zheng; Xiao-Jia Wang
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 4.060

Review 3.  Rapidly changing treatment algorithms for metastatic nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  B Melosky
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 3.677

4.  Comparative Effectiveness of Biomarkers to Target Cancer Treatment: Modeling Implications for Survival and Costs.

Authors:  Jeanette K Birnbaum; Foluso O Ademuyiwa; Josh J Carlson; Leslie Mallinger; Mark W Mason; Ruth Etzioni
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 2.583

Review 5.  Clinicopathological features and treatment outcomes of metastatic tumors in the stomach.

Authors:  Tsutomu Namikawa; Kazuhiro Hanazaki
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 6.  High-throughput approaches for screening and analysis of cell behaviors.

Authors:  Jungmok Seo; Jung-Youn Shin; Jeroen Leijten; Oju Jeon; Gulden Camci-Unal; Anna D Dikina; Katelyn Brinegar; Amir M Ghaemmaghami; Eben Alsberg; Ali Khademhosseini
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 12.479

7.  Implementation of the 21-gene recurrence score test in the United States in 2011.

Authors:  Julie A Lynch; Brygida Berse; Valentina Petkov; Kelly Filipski; Yingjun Zhou; Muin J Khoury; Michael Hassett; Andrew N Freedman
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 8.822

8.  Positive correlation between expression level of mitochondrial serine hydroxymethyltransferase and breast cancer grade.

Authors:  Ke Yin
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Application of tissue mesodissection to molecular cancer diagnostics.

Authors:  David Krizman; Nils Adey; Robert Parry
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  PBK/TOPK enhances aggressive phenotype in prostate cancer via β-catenin-TCF/LEF-mediated matrix metalloproteinases production and invasion.

Authors:  Joshua D Brown-Clay; Deepika N Shenoy; Olga Timofeeva; Bhaskar V Kallakury; Asit K Nandi; Partha P Banerjee
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-06-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.