Literature DB >> 23490908

Head-to-head comparison of lymph node density and number of positive lymph nodes in stratifying the outcome of patients with lymph node-positive prostate cancer submitted to radical prostatectomy and extended lymph node dissection.

Niccolò Maria Passoni1, Firas Abdollah1, Nazareno Suardi1, Andrea Gallina1, Marco Bianchi1, Manuela Tutolo1, Nicola Fossati1, Giorgio Gandaglia1, Andrea Salonia1, Massimo Freschi2, Patrizio Rigatti1, Francesco Montorsi1, Alberto Briganti3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the predictive ability of lymph node density (LND) and number of positive lymph nodes in patients with prostate cancer and lymph node invasion.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included 568 patients with lymph node invasion treated with radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection between January 1990 and July 2011 at a single center. The Kaplan-Meier method and multivariable Cox regression models tested the association between the number of positive lymph nodes or LND and cancer-specific survival (CSS). The predictive accuracy of a baseline model was assessed using Harrell's concordance index and then compared with that of a model including either the number of positive nodes or LND.
RESULTS: The median number of positive lymph nodes was 2, whereas the median LND was 11.1%. At 5, 8, and 10 years, CSS rates were 92.5%, 83.9%, and 82.8%, respectively. At multivariable analyses, number of positive lymph nodes and LND, considered as continuous variables, were independent predictors of CSS (all P≤0.01). A 30% LND cutoff was found to be highly predictive of CSS (P = 0.004), and a cutoff of 2 positive nodes was confirmed to be a strong predictor of CSS (P = 0.02). The number of positive nodes and LND similarly, continuous or dichotomized, increased the accuracy for CSS predictions (0.68-0.69 vs. 0.61 of baseline model). LND cutoff of 30% increased the discrimination the most (0.69; +0.083).
CONCLUSIONS: The number of positive lymph nodes and LND showed comparable discriminative power for long-term CSS predictions. A cutoff of 30% LND might be suggested for the selection of patients candidate for adjuvant systemic therapy, because it increased the model's discrimination the most.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Outcome; Pelvic lymph node dissection; Prostate cancer; Radical prostatectomy; Staging

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23490908     DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2012.10.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Oncol        ISSN: 1078-1439            Impact factor:   3.498


  10 in total

1.  Preclinical evaluation of robotic-assisted sentinel lymph node fluorescence imaging.

Authors:  Michael A Liss; Salman Farshchi-Heydari; Zhengtao Qin; Sean A Hickey; David J Hall; Christopher J Kane; David R Vera
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  Extended versus limited pelvic lymph node dissection during bilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy and its effect on continence and erectile function recovery: long-term results and trifecta rates of a comparative analysis.

Authors:  Georgios Hatzichristodoulou; Stefan Wagenpfeil; Gudrun Wagenpfeil; Tobias Maurer; Thomas Horn; Kathleen Herkommer; Marie Hegemann; Jürgen E Gschwend; Hubert Kübler
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Whole pelvis radiotherapy for pathological node-positive prostate cancer : Oncological outcome and prognostic factors.

Authors:  Filip Poelaert; Valérie Fonteyne; Piet Ost; Bart De Troyer; Karel Decaestecker; Gert De Meerleer; Pieter De Visschere; Tom Claeys; Bert Dhondt; Nicolaas Lumen
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 3.621

4.  Robotic-assisted fluorescence sentinel lymph node mapping using multimodal image guidance in an animal model.

Authors:  Michael A Liss; Sean P Stroup; Zhengtao Qin; Carl K Hoh; David J Hall; David R Vera; Christopher J Kane
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2014-08-16       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  How many lymph nodes are enough? Assessing the adequacy of lymph node yield for staging in favorable histology wilms tumor.

Authors:  Amanda F Saltzman; Derek E Smith; Dexiang Gao; Debashis Ghosh; Arya Amini; Jennifer H Aldrink; Roshni Dasgupta; Kenneth W Gow; Richard D Glick; Peter F Ehrlich; Nicholas G Cost
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 2.545

Review 6.  Patients with Positive Lymph Nodes after Radical Prostatectomy and Pelvic Lymphadenectomy-Do We Know the Proper Way of Management?

Authors:  Bartosz Małkiewicz; Miłosz Knura; Małgorzata Łątkowska; Maximilian Kobylański; Krystian Nagi; Dawid Janczak; Joanna Chorbińska; Wojciech Krajewski; Jakub Karwacki; Tomasz Szydełko
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-08       Impact factor: 6.575

7.  Factors affecting lymph node sampling patterns and the impact on survival of lymph node density in patients with Wilms tumor: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result (SEER) database review.

Authors:  Jonathan P Walker; Jared S Johnson; Megan M Eguchi; Amanda F Saltzman; Myles Cockburn; Nicholas G Cost
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 1.830

8.  Lymph node ratio determines the benefit of adjuvant radiotherapy in pathologically 3 or less lymph node-positive prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy: a population-based analysis with propensity-score matching.

Authors:  Yi-Jun Kim; Changhoon Song; Keun-Yong Eom; In Ah Kim; Jae-Sung Kim
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-11-22

9.  Lymph node density in oral cavity cancer: results of the International Consortium for Outcomes Research.

Authors:  S G Patel; M Amit; T C Yen; C T Liao; P Chaturvedi; J P Agarwal; L P Kowalski; A Ebrahimi; J R Clark; C R Cernea; S J Brandao; M Kreppel; J Zöller; D Fliss; E Fridman; G Bachar; T Shpitzer; V A Bolzoni; P R Patel; S Jonnalagadda; K T Robbins; J P Shah; Z Gil
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Establishment of a prognostic scoring model for regional recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma after neck dissection.

Authors:  Xiaoyun Li; Chao Lin; Jinjie Yan; Qiuyan Chen; Xuesong Sun; Sailan Liu; Shanshan Guo; Liting Liu; Haojun Xie; Qingnan Tang; Yujing Liang; Ling Guo; Hao Li; Xuekui Liu; Xiang Guo; Linquan Tang; Haiqiang Mai
Journal:  Cancer Biol Med       Date:  2020-02-15       Impact factor: 4.248

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.