OBJECTIVE: To compare intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) outcome of patients with cryptozoospermia after use of ejaculated versus testicular sperm in different cycles of the same patients. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: University-affiliated infertility center. PATIENT(S): A total of 17 patients with cryptozoospermia who underwent a total of 116 ICSI cycles. INTERVENTION(S): The patients initially underwent several ICSI cycles using ejaculated sperm (n = 68, 58.6%) that were followed by ICSI cycles using testicular sperm (n = 48, 41.4%). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Fertilization rate, pregnancy rate (PR). RESULT(S): There were no significant differences in fertilization rates between the two subgroups. A comparison between testicular sperm extraction (TESE) versus ejaculated sperm cycles revealed significantly higher implantation rate (20.7% vs. 5.7%), higher PR (42.5% vs. 15.1%), and higher take home baby rate (27.5% vs. 9.4%). A multivariable logistic regression analysis showed three significant predictors for pregnancy, namely the use of testicular sperm (odds ratio [OR] 5.1, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.8-14.8), use of motile sperm (OR 12.9, 95% CI 2.1-79.1), and female age (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.7-0.9). CONCLUSION(S): Testicular sperm extraction is justified in patients with cryptozoospermia who fail to conceive by ICSI using ejaculated spermatozoa, as it offers higher PR.
OBJECTIVE: To compare intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) outcome of patients with cryptozoospermia after use of ejaculated versus testicular sperm in different cycles of the same patients. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: University-affiliated infertility center. PATIENT(S): A total of 17 patients with cryptozoospermia who underwent a total of 116 ICSI cycles. INTERVENTION(S): The patients initially underwent several ICSI cycles using ejaculated sperm (n = 68, 58.6%) that were followed by ICSI cycles using testicular sperm (n = 48, 41.4%). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Fertilization rate, pregnancy rate (PR). RESULT(S): There were no significant differences in fertilization rates between the two subgroups. A comparison between testicular sperm extraction (TESE) versus ejaculated sperm cycles revealed significantly higher implantation rate (20.7% vs. 5.7%), higher PR (42.5% vs. 15.1%), and higher take home baby rate (27.5% vs. 9.4%). A multivariable logistic regression analysis showed three significant predictors for pregnancy, namely the use of testicular sperm (odds ratio [OR] 5.1, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.8-14.8), use of motile sperm (OR 12.9, 95% CI 2.1-79.1), and female age (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.7-0.9). CONCLUSION(S): Testicular sperm extraction is justified in patients with cryptozoospermia who fail to conceive by ICSI using ejaculated spermatozoa, as it offers higher PR.
Authors: A M Mahesan; S Sadek; V Moussavi; T Vazifedan; A Majeed; T Cunningham; S Oehninger; S Bocca Journal: J Assist Reprod Genet Date: 2018-06-20 Impact factor: 3.412
Authors: Rafael F Ambar; Ashok Agarwal; Ahmad Majzoub; Sarah Vij; Nicholas N Tadros; Chak Lam Cho; Neel Parekh; Edson Borges; Sidney Glina Journal: World J Mens Health Date: 2020-06-25 Impact factor: 5.400