Literature DB >> 23489945

Factors predictive of inaccurate determination of horizontal extent of intestinal-type early gastric cancers during endoscopic submucosal dissection: a retrospective analysis.

Itsuko Asada-Hirayama1, Shinya Kodashima, Osamu Goto, Nobutake Yamamichi, Satoshi Ono, Keiko Niimi, Satoshi Mochizuki, Maki Konno-Shimizu, Rie Mikami-Matsuda, Chihiro Minatsuki, Yu Takahashi, Keisuke Matsusaka, Tetsuo Ushiku, Masashi Fukayama, Mitsuhiro Fujishiro, Kazuhiko Koike.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Certain tumor characteristics may pose challenges when endoscopically determining the horizontal extent of early gastric cancers (EGC). In the present study, clinicopathological features related to inaccurate endoscopic evaluation of horizontal extent of intestinal-type EGC were analyzed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed 431 lesions with intestinal-type EGC treated by endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) at our hospital. We focused on whether pretreatment demarcation was accurate by comparing positional relationships between marking dots and tumor edges in resected specimens, and factors related to inaccurate evaluation were analyzed. Gender, age, tumor size, location, circumference, depth, ulceration, macroscopic type, presence of a flat (0-IIb) component, predominant histological type, mixture of diffuse-type adenocarcinoma, mixed histology, and use of magnification endoscopy with narrow band imaging were analyzed. Reasons for inaccurate evaluation were also investigated by re-examining endoscopic images and prepared histological slides.
RESULTS: Rate of inaccurate evaluation of horizontal extent was 7.4% (32/431 lesions). Multivariate analysis revealed the following significant independent variables contributing to inaccurate endoscopic evaluation: presence of a flat component, large size, and predominant histological findings of moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma. Re-examination of prepared histological slides of inaccurately evaluated cases revealed a marginal flat spreading area in 28 of the 32 lesions (87.5%). In 14 of the 32 lesions (43.8%), tumor margins were composed of moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma.
CONCLUSIONS: For lesions with a flat component, large lesions, and moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma, determination of the horizontal extent can be challenging in EGC indicated for ESD, even with the best available endoscopic tools.
© 2013 The Authors. Digestive Endoscopy © 2013 Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  early gastric cancer (EGC); endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD); horizontal extent; inaccurate demarcation; marking dots

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23489945     DOI: 10.1111/den.12043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Endosc        ISSN: 0915-5635            Impact factor:   7.559


  7 in total

1.  Diagnostic group classifications of gastric neoplasms by endoscopic resection criteria before and after treatment: real-world experience.

Authors:  Jun Hee Lee; Yang Won Min; Jun Haeng Lee; Eun Ran Kim; Hyuk Lee; Byung-Hoon Min; Jae J Kim; Kee-Taek Jang; Kyoung-Mee Kim; Cheol Keun Park
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Evaluation of the margins of differentiated early gastric cancer by using conventional endoscopy.

Authors:  Shigetaka Yoshinaga; Ichiro Oda; Seiichiro Abe; Satoru Nonaka; Haruhisa Suzuki; Hajime Takisawa; Hirokazu Taniguchi; Yutaka Saito
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-06-10

3.  Risk factors and management of positive horizontal margin in early gastric cancer resected by en bloc endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Authors:  Norifumi Numata; Shiro Oka; Shinji Tanaka; Kenichi Kagemoto; Yoji Sanomura; Shigeto Yoshida; Koji Arihiro; Fumio Shimamoto; Kazuaki Chayama
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 7.370

4.  Effective optical identification of type "0-IIb" early gastric cancer with narrow band imaging magnification endoscopy, successfully treated by endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Authors:  Nikolas Eleftheriadis; Ηaruhiro Inoue; Haruo Ikeda; Manabu Onimaru; Akira Yoshida; Roberta Maselli; Grace Santi; Shigeharu Hamatani; Shin-Ei Kudo
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar

5.  Factors associated with incomplete gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection due to misdiagnosis.

Authors:  Haruhisa Suzuki; Ichiro Oda; Masau Sekiguchi; Seiichiro Abe; Satoru Nonaka; Shigetaka Yoshinaga; Yutaka Saito
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2016-06-29

6.  Magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging is more accurate for determination of horizontal extent of early gastric cancers than chromoendoscopy.

Authors:  Itsuko Asada-Hirayama; Shinya Kodashima; Yoshiki Sakaguchi; Satoshi Ono; Keiko Niimi; Satoshi Mochizuki; Yosuke Tsuji; Chihiro Minatsuki; Satoki Shichijo; Keisuke Matsuzaka; Tetsuo Ushiku; Masashi Fukayama; Nobutake Yamamichi; Mitsuhiro Fujishiro; Kazuhiko Koike
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2016-06

7.  Pre- and post-ESD discrepancies in clinicopathologic criteria in early gastric cancer: the NECA-Korea ESD for Early Gastric Cancer Prospective Study (N-Keep).

Authors:  Joon Mee Kim; Jin Hee Sohn; Mee-Yon Cho; Woo Ho Kim; Hee Kyung Chang; Eun Sun Jung; Myeong-Cherl Kook; So-Young Jin; Yang Seok Chae; Young Soo Park; Mi Seon Kang; Hyunki Kim; Jae Hyuk Lee; Do Youn Park; Kyoung Mee Kim; Hoguen Kim; Youn Wha Kim; Seung-Sik Hwang; Sang Yong Seol; Hwoon-Yong Jung; Na Rae Lee; Seung-Hee Park; Ji Hye You
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 7.370

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.