Literature DB >> 23489892

Evaluation of mammographic surveillance services in women aged 40-49 years with a moderate family history of breast cancer: a single-arm cohort study.

S W Duffy1, J Mackay, S Thomas, E Anderson, T H H Chen, I Ellis, G Evans, H Fielder, R Fox, G Gui, D Macmillan, S Moss, C Rogers, M Sibbering, M Wallis, R Warren, E Watson, D Whynes, P Allgood, J Caunt.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Women with a significant family history of breast cancer are often offered more intensive and earlier surveillance than is offered to the general population in the National Breast Screening Programme. Up to now, this strategy has not been fully evaluated.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the benefit of mammographic surveillance for women aged 40-49 years at moderate risk of breast cancer due to family history. The study is referred to as FH01.
DESIGN: This was a single-arm cohort study with recruitment taking place between January 2003 and February 2007. Recruits were women aged < 50 years with a family history of breast or ovarian cancer conferring at least a 3% risk of breast cancer between ages 40 and 49 years. The women were offered annual mammography for at least 5 years and observed for the occurrence of breast cancer during the surveillance period. The age group 40-44 years was targeted so that they would still be aged < 50 years after 5 years of surveillance.
SETTING: Seventy-four surveillance centres in England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 6710 women, 94% of whom were aged < 45 years at recruitment, with a family history of breast cancer estimated to imply at least a 3% risk of the disease between the ages of 40 and 50 years.
INTERVENTIONS: Annual mammography for at least 5 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary study end point was the predicted risk of death from breast cancer as estimated from the size, lymph node status and grade of the tumours diagnosed. This was compared with the control group from the UK Breast Screening Age Trial (Age Trial), adjusting for the different underlying incidence in the two populations.
RESULTS: As of December 2010, there were 165 breast cancers diagnosed in 37,025 person-years of observation and 30,556 mammographic screening episodes. Of these, 122 (74%) were diagnosed at screening. The cancers included 44 (27%) cases of ductal carcinoma in situ. There were 19 predicted deaths in 37,025 person-years in FH01, with an estimated incidence of 6.3 per 1000 per year. The corresponding figures for the Age Trial control group were 204 predicted deaths in 622,127 person-years and an incidence of 2.4 per 1000 per year. This gave an estimated 40% reduction in breast cancer mortality (relative risk = 0.60; 95% confidence interval 0.37 to 0.98; p = 0.04).
CONCLUSIONS: Annual mammography in women aged 40-49 years with a significant family history of breast or ovarian cancer is both clinically effective in reducing breast cancer mortality and cost-effective. There is a need to further standardise familial risk assessment, to research the impact of digital mammography and to clarify the role of breast density in this population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: National Research Register N0484114809. FUNDING: This project was funded by the NIHR Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 17, No. 11. See the HTA programme website for further project information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23489892      PMCID: PMC4781478          DOI: 10.3310/hta17110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Technol Assess        ISSN: 1366-5278            Impact factor:   4.014


  5 in total

Review 1.  Epigenetic Biomarkers of Breast Cancer Risk: Across the Breast Cancer Prevention Continuum.

Authors:  Mary Beth Terry; Jasmine A McDonald; Hui Chen Wu; Sybil Eng; Regina M Santella
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.622

2.  Effectiveness of interventions to identify and manage patients with familial cancer risk in primary care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Siang Ing Lee; Mitesh Patel; Brittany Dutton; Stephen Weng; Jocelyn Luveta; Nadeem Qureshi
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2019-05-06

3.  Mammography screening and mortality by risk status in the California teachers study.

Authors:  Hannah Lui Park; Jenny Chang; Vikram Haridass; Sophia S Wang; Argyrios Ziogas; Hoda Anton-Culver
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-12-18       Impact factor: 4.430

4.  Characteristics predicting recommendation for familial breast cancer referral in a cohort of women from primary care.

Authors:  Siang Ing Lee; Nadeem Qureshi; Brittany Dutton; Joe Kai; Stephen Weng
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2020-01-22

5.  No strong evidence for increased risk of breast cancer 8-26 years after multiple mammograms in their 30s in females at moderate and high familial risk.

Authors:  D Gareth Evans; C John Kotre; Elaine Harkness; Mary Wilson; Anthony J Maxwell; Anthony Howell
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 3.039

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.