CONTEXT: Although intimate partner violence and anal intercourse are common in young adult relationships, few studies have examined whether these behaviors are associated with each other. METHODS: Data from 6,280 women aged 18-28 who took part in Wave 3 of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health were used to examine the association between physical and sexual intimate partner violence and anal intercourse in 10,462 relationships. Multivariate hierarchical random effects models were used to adjust for the clustered survey design and for the multiple relationships reported per participant. RESULTS: Physical violence occurred in 29% of relationships, sexual violence in 11% and anal intercourse in 14%. The odds that a couple had had anal intercourse were greater among relationships that included physical violence perpetrated by both partners or only by the woman than among nonviolent relationships (odds ratios, 1.7 and 1.9, respectively). The odds of anal intercourse were also elevated among sexually abusive relationships, although only if the woman was the sole victim or the sole perpetrator (1.3 and 2.0, respectively). In relationships that included anal intercourse, the odds of condom use were lower if the woman was a victim of physical violence than if no violence occurred (0.2). Sexual violence was not associated with condom use. CONCLUSION: Women in physically violent relationships may be at increased risk for STDs because of their elevated exposure to unprotected anal intercourse. More information on the context surrounding anal intercourse and intimate partner violence is needed to understand the nuances of this association.
CONTEXT: Although intimate partner violence and anal intercourse are common in young adult relationships, few studies have examined whether these behaviors are associated with each other. METHODS: Data from 6,280 women aged 18-28 who took part in Wave 3 of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health were used to examine the association between physical and sexual intimate partner violence and anal intercourse in 10,462 relationships. Multivariate hierarchical random effects models were used to adjust for the clustered survey design and for the multiple relationships reported per participant. RESULTS: Physical violence occurred in 29% of relationships, sexual violence in 11% and anal intercourse in 14%. The odds that a couple had had anal intercourse were greater among relationships that included physical violence perpetrated by both partners or only by the woman than among nonviolent relationships (odds ratios, 1.7 and 1.9, respectively). The odds of anal intercourse were also elevated among sexually abusive relationships, although only if the woman was the sole victim or the sole perpetrator (1.3 and 2.0, respectively). In relationships that included anal intercourse, the odds of condom use were lower if the woman was a victim of physical violence than if no violence occurred (0.2). Sexual violence was not associated with condom use. CONCLUSION:Women in physically violent relationships may be at increased risk for STDs because of their elevated exposure to unprotected anal intercourse. More information on the context surrounding anal intercourse and intimate partner violence is needed to understand the nuances of this association.
Authors: Anita Raj; M Christina Santana; Ana La Marche; Hortensia Amaro; Kevin Cranston; Jay G Silverman Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2006-05-02 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Jocelyn Elmes; Romain Silhol; Kristen L Hess; Lukyn M Gedge; Ashley Nordsletten; Roisin Staunton; Peter Anton; Barbara Shacklett; Ian McGowan; Que Dang; Adaora A Adimora; Dobromir T Dimitrov; Sevgi Aral; Senad Handanagic; Gabriela Paz-Bailey; Marie-Claude Boily Journal: Am J Reprod Immunol Date: 2020-06-09 Impact factor: 3.886
Authors: Pamina M Gorbach; Heather Pines; Marjan Javanbakht; Robert E Weiss; Robin Jeffries; Ross D Cranston; Edward J Fuchs; Marjan Hezerah; Stephen Brown; Alen Voskanian; Peter Anton Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2014-12-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Michele R Decker; Elizabeth Miller; Heather L McCauley; Daniel J Tancredi; Heather Anderson; Rebecca R Levenson; Jay G Silverman Journal: Sex Transm Infect Date: 2013-11-14 Impact factor: 3.519
Authors: Zoe Duby; Miriam Hartmann; Elizabeth T Montgomery; Christopher J Colvin; Barbara Mensch; Ariane van der Straten Journal: Cult Health Sex Date: 2015-07-30
Authors: Paul E George; Angela M Bayer; Patricia J Garcia; Jose E Perez-Lu; Jessica G Burke; Thomas J Coates; Pamina M Gorbach Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2016-09
Authors: Branwen Nia Owen; Rebecca F Baggaley; Mathieu Maheu-Giroux; Jocelyn Elmes; Adaora A Adimora; Catalina Ramirez; Andrew Edmonds; Kemi Sosanya; Tonya N Taylor; Michael Plankey; Julie A Cederbaum; Dominika Seidman; Kathleen M Weber; Elizabeth T Golub; Jessica Wells; Hector Bolivar; Deborah Konkle-Parker; Gudrun Pregartner; Marie-Claude Boily Journal: BMC Womens Health Date: 2022-07-14 Impact factor: 2.742