Literature DB >> 23489588

sMICA and its emerging role as a prognostic and diagnostic indicator in systemic malignancies besides hepatocellular carcinoma.

Shailendra Kapoor.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23489588      PMCID: PMC3845571          DOI: 10.5732/cjc.012.10234

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chin J Cancer        ISSN: 1944-446X


× No keyword cloud information.
I read the recent article by Li et al.[1] with great interest. Intriguingly, emerging evidence suggests that soluble major histocompatibility complex class I–related chain A (sMICA) may be an important diagnostic and prognostic marker in a number of systemic malignancies besides hepatocellular carcinoma. For instance, higher sMICA levels are seen in oral squamous cell carcinomas of high TNM stages[2]. Thus, sMICA can be used as a diagnostic and prognostic indicator of advanced stage and especially lymph node metastasis in oral carcinomas. Tamaki et al.[3] have shown that patients with oral carcinomas with high sMICA levels (≥50 ng/L) have lower overall survival rates than do patients with low sMICA levels (<50 ng/L). sMICA may also be used as a diagnostic biomarker in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas. When used in conjunction with serum uric acid and sMICB, sMICA provides additional information on the prognosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma[4]. sMICA also exhibits higher specificity and sensitivity when compared with CA19-9, a known marker for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas. Indeed, Chung et al.[4] reported a sensitivity of 76.5% and a specificity of 91.2% for sMICA, while a sensitivity of 73.5% and a specificity of 90.9% for CA19-9. Moreover, sMICA levels were found to be closely related to distant metastasis of pancreatic cancer. Collectively, the three markers sMICA, sMICB, and CA19-9 provide more information than did CA19-9 alone. In colorectal cancer, sMICA levels alter in the advanced stages. These elevated levels may prove to be a highly sensitive marker for advanced stage colorectal cancer[5]. A close relationship exists between the TNM stage and sMICA levels in breast cancers; as with other cancers described here, breast cancers of advanced TNM stage exhibit higher sMICA levels. sMICA contributes to immunological escape of mammary neoplasms by impairing immune surveillance mediated by natural killer cells[6]. At the same time, it attenuates natural killer group 2, member D (NKG2D) expression. A simultaneous attenuation effect is seen in interferon-gamma secretion. Poorly differentiated and late-stage osteosarcomas demonstrate higher sMICA levels, making sMICA an excellent prognostic and diagnostic indicator of advanced stages in osteosarcomas[7]. sMICA is also a highly accurate independent prognostic indicator in multiple myelomas. Poor progression-free survival rates are seen in multiple myelomas with sMICA levels greater than 305 pg/mL[8]. The above examples clearly illustrate the diagnostic and prognostic significance of sMICA in systemic cancers and the need for further studies to establish similar plausible relationships in other systemic malignancies.
  8 in total

1.  [Association of MICA gene polymorphism and serum soluble MICA level with colorectal cancer].

Authors:  Wei-juan Gong; Wei-ming Xiao; Chun-xiang Gong; Fang Tian; Ming-chun Ji
Journal:  Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2010-06

2.  Clinical significance of serum levels of immune-associated molecules, uric acid and soluble MHC class I chain-related molecules A and B, as diagnostic tumor markers for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Hye Won Chung; Jong-Baeck Lim
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2011-07-03       Impact factor: 6.716

3.  Soluble MICA as an independent prognostic factor for the overall survival and progression-free survival of multiple myeloma patients.

Authors:  Vera Rebmann; Philipp Schütt; Dieter Brandhorst; Bertram Opalka; Thomas Moritz; Mohammad Reza Nowrousian; Hans Grosse-Wilde
Journal:  Clin Immunol       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 3.969

4.  Relationship between soluble MICA and the MICA A5.1 homozygous genotype in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Shigehiro Tamaki; Masayoshi Kawakami; Yasutsugu Yamanaka; Hiroyuki Shimomura; Yuichiro Imai; Jun-ichi Ishida; Kazuhiko Yamamoto; Akiko Ishitani; Katsuhiko Hatake; Tadaaki Kirita
Journal:  Clin Immunol       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 3.969

5.  [The roles of soluble MICA in immune escape of breast tumor].

Authors:  Yun-bin Ye; Zhi-feng Zhou; Qiang Chen; Jie-yu Li; Xia Chen; Wei-wei Huang
Journal:  Xi Bao Yu Fen Zi Mian Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2008-09

6.  [Expression of membrane/soluble MHC class I chain-related molecule A and NKG2D receptor in osteosarcoma and its clinical significance].

Authors:  Ping Xiao; Ling Xue; Li-hong Che; Hui-xi Wu; Hui Qiao
Journal:  Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2007-09

7.  Association between soluble MICA levels and disease stage IV oral squamous cell carcinoma in Japanese patients.

Authors:  Shigehiro Tamaki; Nobuyuki Sanefuzi; Masayoshi Kawakami; Kumiko Aoki; Yuichiro Imai; Yasutsugu Yamanaka; Kazuhiko Yamamoto; Akiko Ishitani; Katsuhiko Hatake; Tadaaki Kirita
Journal:  Hum Immunol       Date:  2008-02-22       Impact factor: 2.850

8.  Prognostic value of soluble MICA levels in the serum of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Jian-Jun Li; Ke Pan; Mo-Fa Gu; Min-Shan Chen; Jing-Jing Zhao; Hui Wang; Xiao-Ting Liang; Jian-Cong Sun; Jian-Chuan Xia
Journal:  Chin J Cancer       Date:  2012-06-14
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.