Literature DB >> 23489538

Automated 3D analysis of pre-procedural MDCT to predict annulus plane angulation and C-arm positioning: benefit on procedural outcome in patients referred for TAVR.

Mariam Samim1, Pieter R Stella, Pierfrancesco Agostoni, Jolanda Kluin, Faiez Ramjankhan, Ricardo P J Budde, Gertjan Sieswerda, Emanuela Algeri, Camille van Belle, Ahmed Elkalioubie, Francis Juthier, Anouar Belkacemi, Michel E Bertrand, Pieter A Doevendans, Eric Van Belle.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine whether pre-procedural analysis of multidetector row computed tomography (MDCT) scans could accurately predict the "line of perpendicularity" (LP) of the aortic annulus and corresponding C-arm angulations required for prosthesis delivery and impact the outcome of the procedure.
BACKGROUND: Optimal positioning of the transcatheter aortic prosthesis is paramount to transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) procedural success.
METHODS: All patients referred for TAVR at our center underwent a routine pre-procedural MDCT scan. A 3-dimensional (3D) analysis using software dedicated to define the LP of the aortic annulus and the corresponding C-arm positioning was performed in 71 consecutive patients. In 35 patients, the results of the MDCT analysis were not available at the time of the procedure (angiography cohort). In that cohort the position of the C-arm was determined during the procedure using ad-hoc angiography. In 36 patients, the MDCT analysis was performed pre-procedure and results were available at the time of the procedure (MDCT cohort). In that cohort the position of the C-arm was derived from the MDCT analysis rather than by ad-hoc angiography.
RESULTS: Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of MDCT analysis to predict the LP of the aortic annulus were excellent (kappa = 1 and 0.94, respectively). Patient variations of the LP ranged >70°. Compared with the angiography cohort, the MDCT cohort was associated with a significant decrease in implantation time (p = 0.0001), radiation exposure (p = 0.02), amount of contrast (p = 0.001), and risk of acute kidney injury (p = 0.03). Additionally, the combined rate of valve malposition and aortic regurgitation was also reduced (6% vs. 23%, p = 0.03).
CONCLUSIONS: Automated 3D analysis of pre-implantation MDCT accurately predicts the LP of the aortic annulus and the corresponding C-arm position required for TAVR. With this approach, the implantation of the balloon-expandable prosthetic valve can be performed without an aortogram in the majority of cases and still be safe, with a low rate of valve malpositioning and regurgitation.
Copyright © 2013 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23489538     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.12.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1876-7591


  11 in total

Review 1.  DNA transposons in vertebrate functional genomics.

Authors:  C Miskey; Z Izsvák; K Kawakami; Z Ivics
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 2.  [Aortic valve stenosis: computed tomography prior to transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). How can the outcome be improved?].

Authors:  M Hell; S Achenbach; M Arnold
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 3.  CT support of cardiac structural interventions.

Authors:  Michaela M Hell; Stephan Achenbach
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Artificial intelligence and automation in valvular heart diseases.

Authors:  Qiang Long; Xiaofeng Ye; Qiang Zhao
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 2.737

5.  Computed Tomography for Structural Heart Disease and Interventions.

Authors:  Pascal Thériault-Lauzier; Marco Spaziano; Beatriz Vaquerizo; Jean Buithieu; Giuseppe Martucci; Nicolo Piazza
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2015-09

Review 6.  Multi-modality imaging of the aortic valve in the era of transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a guide for patient selection, valve selection, and valve delivery.

Authors:  Michael Ragosta
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 4.132

7.  Optimal C-arm angulation during transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Accuracy of a rotational C-arm computed tomography based three dimensional heart model.

Authors:  Verena Veulemans; Sabine Mollus; Axel Saalbach; Max Pietsch; Katharina Hellhammer; Tobias Zeus; Ralf Westenfeld; Jürgen Weese; Malte Kelm; Jan Balzer
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2016-10-26

8.  Automated Segmentation of Light-Sheet Fluorescent Imaging to Characterize Experimental Doxorubicin-Induced Cardiac Injury and Repair.

Authors:  René R Sevag Packard; Kyung In Baek; Tyler Beebe; Nelson Jen; Yichen Ding; Feng Shi; Peng Fei; Bong Jin Kang; Po-Heng Chen; Jonathan Gau; Michael Chen; Jonathan Y Tang; Yu-Huan Shih; Yonghe Ding; Debiao Li; Xiaolei Xu; Tzung K Hsiai
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Comparison of Manual and Automated Preprocedural Segmentation Tools to Predict the Annulus Plane Angulation and C-Arm Positioning for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Verena Veulemans; Tobias Zeus; Laura Kleinebrecht; Jan Balzer; Katharina Hellhammer; Amin Polzin; Patrick Horn; Alexander Blehm; Jan-Philipp Minol; Patric Kröpil; Ralf Westenfeld; Tienush Rassaf; Artur Lichtenberg; Malte Kelm
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The effect of X-ray beam distortion on the Edwards Sapien XT(™) trans-catheter aortic valve replacement prosthesis.

Authors:  James A Crowhurst; Karl K Poon; Dale Murdoch; Alexander Incani; Owen C Raffel; Annelise Liddicoat; Darren Walters
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2015-08-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.