Daniel Mamah1, Deanna M Barch, Grega Repovš. 1. Department of Psychiatry, Washington University in Saint Louis, 660 South Euclid Avenue, Box 8134, Saint Louis, Missouri 63110, USA. mamahd@psychiatry.wustl.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Bipolar disorder (BPD) and schizophrenia (SCZ) share clinical characteristics and genetic contributions. Functional dysconnectivity across various brain networks has been reported to contribute to the pathophysiology of both SCZ and BPD. However, research examining resting-state neural network dysfunction across multiple networks to understand the relationship between these two disorders is lacking. METHODS: We conducted a resting-state functional connectivity fMRI study of 35 BPD and 25 SCZ patients, and 33 controls. Using previously defined regions-of-interest, we computed the mean connectivity within and between five neural networks: default mode (DM), fronto-parietal (FP), cingulo-opercular (CO), cerebellar (CER), and salience (SAL). Repeated measures ANOVAs were used to compare groups, adjusting false discovery rate to control for multiple comparisons. The relationship of connectivity with the SANS/SAPS, vocabulary and matrix reasoning was investigated using hierarchical linear regression analyses. RESULTS: Decreased within-network connectivity was only found for the CO network in BPD. Across groups, connectivity was decreased between CO-CER (p<0.001), to a larger degree in SCZ than in BPD. In SCZ, there was also decreased connectivity in CO-SAL, FP-CO, and FP-CER, while BPD showed decreased CER-SAL connectivity. Disorganization symptoms were predicted by connectivity between CO-CER and CER-SAL. DISCUSSION: Our findings indicate dysfunction in the connections between networks involved in cognitive and emotional processing in the pathophysiology of BPD and SCZ. Both similarities and differences in connectivity were observed across disorders. Further studies are required to investigate relationships of neural networks to more diverse clinical and cognitive domains underlying psychiatric disorders.
BACKGROUND:Bipolar disorder (BPD) and schizophrenia (SCZ) share clinical characteristics and genetic contributions. Functional dysconnectivity across various brain networks has been reported to contribute to the pathophysiology of both SCZ and BPD. However, research examining resting-state neural network dysfunction across multiple networks to understand the relationship between these two disorders is lacking. METHODS: We conducted a resting-state functional connectivity fMRI study of 35 BPD and 25 SCZ patients, and 33 controls. Using previously defined regions-of-interest, we computed the mean connectivity within and between five neural networks: default mode (DM), fronto-parietal (FP), cingulo-opercular (CO), cerebellar (CER), and salience (SAL). Repeated measures ANOVAs were used to compare groups, adjusting false discovery rate to control for multiple comparisons. The relationship of connectivity with the SANS/SAPS, vocabulary and matrix reasoning was investigated using hierarchical linear regression analyses. RESULTS: Decreased within-network connectivity was only found for the CO network in BPD. Across groups, connectivity was decreased between CO-CER (p<0.001), to a larger degree in SCZ than in BPD. In SCZ, there was also decreased connectivity in CO-SAL, FP-CO, and FP-CER, while BPD showed decreased CER-SAL connectivity. Disorganization symptoms were predicted by connectivity between CO-CER and CER-SAL. DISCUSSION: Our findings indicate dysfunction in the connections between networks involved in cognitive and emotional processing in the pathophysiology of BPD and SCZ. Both similarities and differences in connectivity were observed across disorders. Further studies are required to investigate relationships of neural networks to more diverse clinical and cognitive domains underlying psychiatric disorders.
Authors: Heather C Strasser; Jessica Lilyestrom; Ebony R Ashby; Nancy A Honeycutt; David J Schretlen; Ann E Pulver; Ramona O Hopkins; J Raymond Depaulo; James B Potash; Barbara Schweizer; Khara O Yates; Elizabeth Kurian; Patrick E Barta; Godfrey D Pearlson Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2005-03-15 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: John M Allman; Nicole A Tetreault; Atiya Y Hakeem; Kebreten F Manaye; Katerina Semendeferi; Joseph M Erwin; Soyoung Park; Virginie Goubert; Patrick R Hof Journal: Ann N Y Acad Sci Date: 2011-04 Impact factor: 5.691
Authors: C Fajardo; M I Escobar; E Buriticá; G Arteaga; J Umbarila; M F Casanova; H Pimienta Journal: Neurosci Lett Date: 2008-03-04 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Ann K Shinn; Youkyung S Roh; Caitlin T Ravichandran; Justin T Baker; Dost Öngür; Bruce M Cohen Journal: Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging Date: 2017-07
Authors: Julia M Sheffield; Grega Repovs; Michael P Harms; Cameron S Carter; James M Gold; Angus W MacDonald; J Daniel Ragland; Steven M Silverstein; Douglass Godwin; Deanna M Barch Journal: Neuropsychologia Date: 2015-05-13 Impact factor: 3.139
Authors: Julia M Sheffield; Baxter P Rogers; Jennifer U Blackford; Stephan Heckers; Neil D Woodward Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2019-01-04 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: J Stoddard; S J Gotts; M A Brotman; S Lever; D Hsu; C Zarate; M Ernst; D S Pine; E Leibenluft Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2016-02-29 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: Gregory C Burgess; Sridhar Kandala; Dan Nolan; Timothy O Laumann; Jonathan D Power; Babatunde Adeyemo; Michael P Harms; Steven E Petersen; Deanna M Barch Journal: Brain Connect Date: 2016-09-30
Authors: Wi Hoon Jung; Kristin Prehn; Zhuo Fang; Marc Korczykowski; Joseph W Kable; Hengyi Rao; Diana C Robertson Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2016-07-22 Impact factor: 6.556