Literature DB >> 2348726

Prospective study of the effectiveness and durability of carotid endarterectomy.

T M Sundt1, J P Whisnant, O W Houser, N C Fode.   

Abstract

In a series of 252 consecutive patients who underwent 282 carotid endarterectomies, we conducted clinical and angiographic follow-up for 2 to 6 years (mean, 3.2 years). Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) was done postoperatively in 95% of cases. Clinical follow-up was achieved in 97% of cases, and DSA follow-up was obtained in 66% of cases. The overall group had a 1% operative minor morbidity (three cases of minimal new neurologic deficit), no major morbidity, and a 0.7% mortality (one death from stroke and one from myocardial infarction). Complications correlated well with the patient's preoperative risk category. During follow-up, 10 minor strokes, only 1 of which was attributable to the reconstructed artery, and 10 transient ischemic attacks, 3 of which were presumably related to recurrent stenosis, occurred. Asymptomatic mild to moderate restenosis of the internal carotid or common carotid artery was identified in 10% of follow-up DSAs and severe stenosis or occlusion in 3%. Stenosis in the opposite common carotid or internal carotid artery progressed in 48 cases (26% of follow-up DSAs and ultrasound studies), and 10 of these became symptomatic. An actuarial analysis of patients who had endarterectomy indicated that the cumulative probability of ipsilateral stroke was 1.5% at 1 month and 2% at 5 years. The cumulative probability of ipsilateral stroke, transient ischemic attack, or reversible ischemic neurologic deficit was 4% at 1 month and 8% at 5 years or less than 1% per year after the first month, with censoring at the time of the second surgical procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2348726     DOI: 10.1016/s0025-6196(12)65124-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc        ISSN: 0025-6196            Impact factor:   7.616


  5 in total

1.  Quality improvement guidelines for the performance of cervical carotid angioplasty and stent placement.

Authors:  John D Barr; John J Connors; David Sacks; Joan C Wojak; Gary J Becker; John F Cardella; Bohdan Chopko; Jacques E Dion; Allan J Fox; Randall T Higashida; Robert W Hurst; Curtis A Lewis; Terence A S Matalon; Gary M Nesbit; J Arliss Pollock; Eric J Russell; David J Seidenwurm; Robert C Wallace
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 2.  Perioperative stroke. Part I: General surgery, carotid artery disease, and carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  D H Wong
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 5.063

3.  Evaluating quality, cost-effective health care. Vascular database predicated on hospital discharge abstracts.

Authors:  W H Edwards; J A Morris; J M Jenkins; S M Bass; E J MacKenzie
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Duplex-assisted carotid artery stenting without administration of contrast medium for patients with chronic kidney disease or allergic reaction.

Authors:  Takashi Mizowaki; Atsushi Fujita; Taichiro Imahori; Atsushi Uyama; Satoshi Inoue; Masaaki Kohta; Hirotoshi Hamaguchi; Takashi Sasayama; Kohkichi Hosoda; Eiji Kohmura
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  Treatment Strategy Based on Plaque Vulnerability and the Treatment Risk Evaluation for Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis.

Authors:  Yoshiro Ito; Wataro Tsuruta; Yasunobu Nakai; Tomoji Takigawa; Aiki Marushima; Tomohiko Masumoto; Yuji Matsumaru; Eiichi Ishikawa; Akira Matsumura
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2018-03-03       Impact factor: 1.742

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.