Literature DB >> 23486941

Spontaneous and task-evoked brain activity negatively interact.

Biyu J He1.   

Abstract

A widely held assumption is that spontaneous and task-evoked brain activity sum linearly, such that the recorded brain response in each single trial is the algebraic sum of the constantly changing ongoing activity and the stereotypical evoked activity. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging signals acquired from normal humans, we show that this assumption is invalid. Across widespread cortices, evoked activity interacts negatively with ongoing activity, such that higher prestimulus baseline results in less activation or more deactivation. As a consequence of this negative interaction, trial-to-trial variability of cortical activity decreases following stimulus onset. We further show that variability reduction follows overlapping but distinct spatial pattern from that of task-activation/deactivation and it contains behaviorally relevant information. These results favor an alternative perspective to the traditional dichotomous framework of ongoing and evoked activity. That is, to view the brain as a nonlinear dynamical system whose trajectory is tighter when performing a task. Further, incoming sensory stimuli modulate the brain's activity in a manner that depends on its initial state. We propose that across-trial variability may provide a new approach to brain mapping in the context of cognitive experiments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23486941      PMCID: PMC3637953          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2922-12.2013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  67 in total

1.  Cellular mechanisms contributing to response variability of cortical neurons in vivo.

Authors:  R Azouz; C M Gray
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-03-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Spatial heterogeneity of the nonlinear dynamics in the FMRI BOLD response.

Authors:  R M Birn; Z S Saad; P A Bandettini
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Small modulation of ongoing cortical dynamics by sensory input during natural vision.

Authors:  József Fiser; Chiayu Chiu; Michael Weliky
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-09-30       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  Decoding mental states from brain activity in humans.

Authors:  John-Dylan Haynes; Geraint Rees
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 5.  State-dependent computations: spatiotemporal processing in cortical networks.

Authors:  Dean V Buonomano; Wolfgang Maass
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 34.870

6.  Reproducibility distinguishes conscious from nonconscious neural representations.

Authors:  Aaron Schurger; Francisco Pereira; Anne Treisman; Jonathan D Cohen
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Unreliable evoked responses in autism.

Authors:  Ilan Dinstein; David J Heeger; Lauren Lorenzi; Nancy J Minshew; Rafael Malach; Marlene Behrmann
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Distributed and overlapping representations of faces and objects in ventral temporal cortex.

Authors:  J V Haxby; M I Gobbini; M L Furey; A Ishai; J L Schouten; P Pietrini
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-09-28       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 9.  The medial temporal lobe.

Authors:  Larry R Squire; Craig E L Stark; Robert E Clark
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 12.449

10.  Basal forebrain activation enhances cortical coding of natural scenes.

Authors:  Michael Goard; Yang Dan
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2009-10-04       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  92 in total

1.  Interactions between resting-state and task-evoked brain activity suggest a different approach to fMRI analysis.

Authors:  Dana Mastrovito
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Bring the Noise: Reconceptualizing Spontaneous Neural Activity.

Authors:  Lucina Q Uddin
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2020-06-27       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Modulating conscious movement intention by noninvasive brain stimulation and the underlying neural mechanisms.

Authors:  Zachary H Douglas; Brian Maniscalco; Mark Hallett; Eric M Wassermann; Biyu J He
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Cortical activity is more stable when sensory stimuli are consciously perceived.

Authors:  Aaron Schurger; Ioannis Sarigiannidis; Lionel Naccache; Jacobo D Sitt; Stanislas Dehaene
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Neural Variability Is Quenched by Attention.

Authors:  Ayelet Arazi; Yaffa Yeshurun; Ilan Dinstein
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  The Functional Relevance of Task-State Functional Connectivity.

Authors:  Michael W Cole; Takuya Ito; Carrisa Cocuzza; Ruben Sanchez-Romero
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Visual stimulation quenches global alpha range activity in awake primate V4: a case study.

Authors:  Thomas Deneux; Timothée Masquelier; Maria A Bermudez; Guillaume S Masson; Gustavo Deco; Ivo Vanzetta
Journal:  Neurophotonics       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 3.593

8.  The Human Brain Traverses a Common Activation-Pattern State Space Across Task and Rest.

Authors:  Richard H Chen; Takuya Ito; Kaustubh R Kulkarni; Michael W Cole
Journal:  Brain Connect       Date:  2018-08-27

9.  The temporal signature of self: Temporal measures of resting-state EEG predict self-consciousness.

Authors:  Annemarie Wolff; Daniel A Di Giovanni; Javier Gómez-Pilar; Takashi Nakao; Zirui Huang; André Longtin; Georg Northoff
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Task-evoked functional connectivity does not explain functional connectivity differences between rest and task conditions.

Authors:  Lauren K Lynch; Kun-Han Lu; Haiguang Wen; Yizhen Zhang; Andrew J Saykin; Zhongming Liu
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.