Literature DB >> 23486879

Pediatric neuroenhancement: ethical, legal, social, and neurodevelopmental implications.

William D Graf1, Saskia K Nagel, Leon G Epstein, Geoffrey Miller, Ruth Nass, Dan Larriviere.   

Abstract

The use of prescription medication to augment cognitive or affective function in healthy persons-or neuroenhancement-is increasing in adult and pediatric populations. In children and adolescents, neuroenhancement appears to be increasing in parallel to the rising rates of attention-deficit disorder diagnoses and stimulant medication prescriptions, and the opportunities for medication diversion. Pediatric neuroenhancement remains a particularly unsettled and value-laden practice, often without appropriate goals or justification. Pediatric neuroenhancement presents its own ethical, social, legal, and developmental issues, including the fiduciary responsibility of physicians caring for children, the special integrity of the doctor-child-parent relationship, the vulnerability of children to various forms of coercion, distributive justice in school settings, and the moral obligation of physicians to prevent misuse of medication. Neurodevelopmental issues include the importance of evolving personal authenticity during childhood and adolescence, the emergence of individual decision-making capacities, and the process of developing autonomy. This Ethics, Law, and Humanities Committee position paper, endorsed by the American Academy of Neurology, Child Neurology Society, and American Neurological Association, focuses on various implications of pediatric neuroenhancement and outlines discussion points in responding to neuroenhancement requests from parents or adolescents. Based on currently available data and the balance of ethics issues reviewed in this position paper, neuroenhancement in legally and developmentally nonautonomous children and adolescents without a diagnosis of a neurologic disorder is not justifiable. In nearly autonomous adolescents, the fiduciary obligation of the physician may be weaker, but the prescription of neuroenhancements is inadvisable because of numerous social, developmental, and professional integrity issues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23486879     DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318289703b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurology        ISSN: 0028-3878            Impact factor:   9.910


  17 in total

1.  Chronic methylphenidate treatment during early life is associated with greater ethanol intake in socially isolated rats.

Authors:  Kathryn E Gill; Ann M Chappell; Thomas J R Beveridge; Linda J Porrino; Jeffrey L Weiner
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.455

2.  Recent publications by ochsner authors.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2013

3.  Comment on "Can transcranial electrical stimulation improve learning difficulties in atypical brain development? A future possibility for cognitive training" by Krause and Cohen Kadosh.

Authors:  Peter B Reiner
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 6.464

Review 4.  Globalization and cognitive enhancement: emerging social and ethical challenges for ADHD clinicians.

Authors:  Ilina Singh; Angela M Filipe; Imre Bard; Meredith Bergey; Lauren Baker
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 5.285

Review 5.  Assessment of potential cardiovascular risks of methylphenidate in comparison with sibutramine: do we need a SCOUT (trial)?

Authors:  Jochen Antel; Özgür Albayrak; Gerd Heusch; Tobias Banaschewski; Johannes Hebebrand
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-23       Impact factor: 5.270

6.  Adderall for All: A Defense of Pediatric Neuroenhancement.

Authors:  Jessica Flanigan
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2013-08-20

7.  Student-Perceived School Climate Is Associated With ADHD Medication Treatment Among Adolescents in Medicaid.

Authors:  Susanna N Visser; Dennis Kramer; Angela B Snyder; Joyce Sebian; Garry McGiboney; Arden Handler
Journal:  J Atten Disord       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 3.256

8.  Trends in the parent-report of health care provider-diagnosed and medicated attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: United States, 2003-2011.

Authors:  Susanna N Visser; Melissa L Danielson; Rebecca H Bitsko; Joseph R Holbrook; Michael D Kogan; Reem M Ghandour; Ruth Perou; Stephen J Blumberg
Journal:  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 8.829

9.  Attitudes towards prescribing cognitive enhancers among primary care physicians in Germany.

Authors:  Andreas G Franke; Carolin Papenburg; Elena Schotten; Peter B Reiner; Klaus Lieb
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 2.497

10.  Enhancement for well-being is still ethically challenging.

Authors:  Saskia K Nagel
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.