Literature DB >> 23486562

Accuracy of four-dimensional phase-contrast velocity mapping for blood flow visualizations: a phantom study.

Anders Nilsson1, Karin Markenroth Bloch, Johannes Töger, Einar Heiberg, Freddy Ståhlberg.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Time-resolved three-dimensional, three-directional phase-contrast magnetic resonance velocity mapping (4D PC-MRI) is a powerful technique to depict dynamic blood flow patterns in the human body. However, the impact of phase background effects on flow visualizations has not been thoroughly studied previously, and it has not yet been experimentally demonstrated to what degree phase offsets affect flow visualizations and create errors such as inaccurate particle traces.
PURPOSE: To quantify background phase offsets and their subsequent impact on particle trace visualizations in a 4D PC-MRI sequence. Additionally, we sought to investigate to what degree visualization errors are reduced by background phase correction.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A rotating phantom with a known velocity field was used to quantify background phase of 4D PC-MRI sequences accelerated with SENSE as well as different k-t BLAST speed-up factors. The deviation in end positions between particle traces in the measured velocity fields were compared before and after the application of two different phase correction methods.
RESULTS: Phantom measurements revealed background velocity offsets up to 7 cm/s (7% of velocity encoding sensitivity) in the central slice, increasing with distance from the center. Background offsets remained constant with increasing k-t BLAST speed-up factors. End deviations of up to 5.3 mm (1.8 voxels) in the direction perpendicular to the rotating disc were found between particle traces and the seeding plane of the traces. Phase correction by subtraction of the data from the stationary phantom reduced the average deviation by up to 56%, while correcting the data-set with a first-order polynomial fit to stationary regions decreased average deviation up to 78%.
CONCLUSION: Pathline visualizations can be significantly affected by background phase errors, highlighting the importance of dedicated and robust phase correction methods. Our results show that pathline deviation can be substantial if adequate phase background errors are not minimized.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Phase errors; background phase correction; blood flow visualization; phase-contrast imaging; velocity mapping

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23486562     DOI: 10.1177/0284185113478005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Radiol        ISSN: 0284-1851            Impact factor:   1.990


  3 in total

1.  A method to correct background phase offset for phase-contrast MRI in the presence of steady flow and spatial wrap-around artifact.

Authors:  Aaron A Pruitt; Ning Jin; Yingmin Liu; Orlando P Simonetti; Rizwan Ahmad
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Volumetric velocity measurements in restricted geometries using spiral sampling: a phantom study.

Authors:  Anders Nilsson; Johan Revstedt; Einar Heiberg; Freddy Ståhlberg; Karin Markenroth Bloch
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2014-05-18       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 3.  MR assessment of abdominal circulation in Fontan physiology.

Authors:  Shi-Joon Yoo; Milan Prsa; Daryl Schantz; Lars Grosse-Wortmann; Mike Seed; Tae Kyoung Kim; Rachel Wald; Rajiv Chaturvedi
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 2.357

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.