BACKGROUND: Syphilis screening for men who have sex with men (MSM) in San Francisco (SF) is recommended every 3 to 6 months. We surveyed MSM in SF to determine the prevalence and factors associated with complying with that recommendation, identify screening barriers, and investigate whether identifying low perceived syphilis risk as a reason for not testing correlated with syphilis risk factors. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey as part of the National HIV Behavioral Surveillance System. We used logistic regression to analyze factors associated with complying with the SF-specific screening recommendation and with identifying low perceived risk as a reason for not testing. We analyzed data on screening barriers descriptively. RESULTS: Among 441 MSM, 37.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 31.5%-43.6%) complied with the recommendation. Compliance was associated with human immunodeficiency virus infection (odds ratio [OR], 3.6; 95% CI, 1.7-7.8), more than 10 male sex partners (OR, 4.3; 95% CI, 1.6-12.0), having unprotected anal sex with a casual partner (OR, 4.2; 95% CI, 2.0-8.9), and knowing the recommendation (OR, 4.1; 95% CI, 2.1-8.2). Low perceived risk, time constraints, and not knowing that one should get screened were identified as reasons for not testing by 61.7%, 18.9%, and 18.8%, respectively. Identifying low perceived risk as a reason for not testing was associated with having more than 10 sex partners (OR, 0.2; 95% CI, 0.1-0.5). CONCLUSIONS: Attempts to improve compliance with the syphilis screening recommendation should include education regarding recommended screening frequency and syphilis risk factors and interventions to increase screening convenience.
BACKGROUND: Syphilis screening for men who have sex with men (MSM) in San Francisco (SF) is recommended every 3 to 6 months. We surveyed MSM in SF to determine the prevalence and factors associated with complying with that recommendation, identify screening barriers, and investigate whether identifying low perceived syphilis risk as a reason for not testing correlated with syphilis risk factors. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey as part of the National HIV Behavioral Surveillance System. We used logistic regression to analyze factors associated with complying with the SF-specific screening recommendation and with identifying low perceived risk as a reason for not testing. We analyzed data on screening barriers descriptively. RESULTS: Among 441 MSM, 37.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 31.5%-43.6%) complied with the recommendation. Compliance was associated with human immunodeficiency virus infection (odds ratio [OR], 3.6; 95% CI, 1.7-7.8), more than 10 male sex partners (OR, 4.3; 95% CI, 1.6-12.0), having unprotected anal sex with a casual partner (OR, 4.2; 95% CI, 2.0-8.9), and knowing the recommendation (OR, 4.1; 95% CI, 2.1-8.2). Low perceived risk, time constraints, and not knowing that one should get screened were identified as reasons for not testing by 61.7%, 18.9%, and 18.8%, respectively. Identifying low perceived risk as a reason for not testing was associated with having more than 10 sex partners (OR, 0.2; 95% CI, 0.1-0.5). CONCLUSIONS: Attempts to improve compliance with the syphilis screening recommendation should include education regarding recommended screening frequency and syphilis risk factors and interventions to increase screening convenience.
Authors: Jorge A Montoya; Charlotte K Kent; Harlan Rotblatt; Jacque McCright; Peter R Kerndt; Jeffrey D Klausner Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: R Guy; J Goller; D Leslie; R Thorpe; J Grierson; C Batrouney; M Kennedy; J Lewis; C Fairley; S Ginige; I Zablotska; M Hellard Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2009-01-29 Impact factor: 3.710
Authors: Duncan A MacKellar; Kathleen M Gallagher; Teresa Finlayson; Travis Sanchez; Amy Lansky; Patrick S Sullivan Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2007 Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: Katherine Ahrens; Charlotte K Kent; Jorge A Montoya; Harlan Rotblatt; Jacque McCright; Peter Kerndt; Jeffrey D Klausner Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Harrell W Chesson; Sarah Kidd; Kyle T Bernstein; Robyn Neblett Fanfair; Thomas L Gift Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2016-07 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: John Bonnewell; Sarah Magaziner; Joseph L Fava; Madeline C Montgomery; Alexi Almonte; Michael Carey; Philip A Chan Journal: SAGE Open Med Date: 2020-02-04