BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Malpighiales are one of the largest angiosperm orders and have undergone radical systematic restructuring based on molecular phylogenetic studies. The clade has been recalcitrant to molecular phylogenetic reconstruction, but has become much more resolved at the suprafamilial level. It now contains so many newly identified clades that there is an urgent need for comparative studies to understand their structure, biology and evolution. This is especially true because the order contains a disproportionally large diversity of rain forest species and includes numerous agriculturally important plants. This study is a first broad systematic step in this endeavour. It focuses on a comparative structural overview of the flowers across all recently identified suprafamilial clades of Malpighiales, and points towards areas that desperately need attention. METHODS: The phylogenetic comparative analysis of floral structure for the order is based on our previously published studies on four suprafamilial clades of Malpighiales, including also four related rosid orders (Celastrales, Crossosomatales, Cucurbitales, Oxalidales). In addition, the results are compiled from a survey of over 3000 publications on macrosystematics, floral structure and embryology across all orders of the core eudicots. KEY RESULTS: Most new suprafamilial clades within Malpighiales are well supported by floral structural features. Inner morphological structures of the gynoecium (i.e. stigmatic lobes, inner shape of the locules, placentation, presence of obturators) and ovules (i.e. structure of the nucellus, thickness of the integuments, presence of vascular bundles in the integuments, presence of an endothelium in the inner integument) appear to be especially suitable for characterizing suprafamilial clades within Malpighiales. CONCLUSIONS: Although the current phylogenetic reconstruction of Malpighiales is much improved compared with earlier versions, it is incomplete, and further focused phylogenetic and morphological studies are needed. Once all major subclades of Malpighiales are elucidated, more in-depth studies on promising structural features can be conducted. In addition, once the phylogenetic tree of Malpighiales, including closely related orders, is more fully resolved, character optimization studies will be possible to reconstruct evolution of structural and biological features within the order.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Malpighiales are one of the largest angiosperm orders and have undergone radical systematic restructuring based on molecular phylogenetic studies. The clade has been recalcitrant to molecular phylogenetic reconstruction, but has become much more resolved at the suprafamilial level. It now contains so many newly identified clades that there is an urgent need for comparative studies to understand their structure, biology and evolution. This is especially true because the order contains a disproportionally large diversity of rain forest species and includes numerous agriculturally important plants. This study is a first broad systematic step in this endeavour. It focuses on a comparative structural overview of the flowers across all recently identified suprafamilial clades of Malpighiales, and points towards areas that desperately need attention. METHODS: The phylogenetic comparative analysis of floral structure for the order is based on our previously published studies on four suprafamilial clades of Malpighiales, including also four related rosid orders (Celastrales, Crossosomatales, Cucurbitales, Oxalidales). In addition, the results are compiled from a survey of over 3000 publications on macrosystematics, floral structure and embryology across all orders of the core eudicots. KEY RESULTS: Most new suprafamilial clades within Malpighiales are well supported by floral structural features. Inner morphological structures of the gynoecium (i.e. stigmatic lobes, inner shape of the locules, placentation, presence of obturators) and ovules (i.e. structure of the nucellus, thickness of the integuments, presence of vascular bundles in the integuments, presence of an endothelium in the inner integument) appear to be especially suitable for characterizing suprafamilial clades within Malpighiales. CONCLUSIONS: Although the current phylogenetic reconstruction of Malpighiales is much improved compared with earlier versions, it is incomplete, and further focused phylogenetic and morphological studies are needed. Once all major subclades of Malpighiales are elucidated, more in-depth studies on promising structural features can be conducted. In addition, once the phylogenetic tree of Malpighiales, including closely related orders, is more fully resolved, character optimization studies will be possible to reconstruct evolution of structural and biological features within the order.
Authors: Vladimir Shulaev; Daniel J Sargent; Ross N Crowhurst; Todd C Mockler; Otto Folkerts; Arthur L Delcher; Pankaj Jaiswal; Keithanne Mockaitis; Aaron Liston; Shrinivasrao P Mane; Paul Burns; Thomas M Davis; Janet P Slovin; Nahla Bassil; Roger P Hellens; Clive Evans; Tim Harkins; Chinnappa Kodira; Brian Desany; Oswald R Crasta; Roderick V Jensen; Andrew C Allan; Todd P Michael; Joao Carlos Setubal; Jean-Marc Celton; D Jasper G Rees; Kelly P Williams; Sarah H Holt; Juan Jairo Ruiz Rojas; Mithu Chatterjee; Bo Liu; Herman Silva; Lee Meisel; Avital Adato; Sergei A Filichkin; Michela Troggio; Roberto Viola; Tia-Lynn Ashman; Hao Wang; Palitha Dharmawardhana; Justin Elser; Rajani Raja; Henry D Priest; Douglas W Bryant; Samuel E Fox; Scott A Givan; Larry J Wilhelm; Sushma Naithani; Alan Christoffels; David Y Salama; Jade Carter; Elena Lopez Girona; Anna Zdepski; Wenqin Wang; Randall A Kerstetter; Wilfried Schwab; Schuyler S Korban; Jahn Davik; Amparo Monfort; Beatrice Denoyes-Rothan; Pere Arus; Ron Mittler; Barry Flinn; Asaph Aharoni; Jeffrey L Bennetzen; Steven L Salzberg; Allan W Dickerman; Riccardo Velasco; Mark Borodovsky; Richard E Veilleux; Kevin M Folta Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2010-12-26 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Charles C Davis; Campbell O Webb; Kenneth J Wurdack; Carlos A Jaramillo; Michael J Donoghue Journal: Am Nat Date: 2005-02-01 Impact factor: 3.926
Authors: Zhenxiang Xi; Brad R Ruhfel; Hanno Schaefer; André M Amorim; M Sugumaran; Kenneth J Wurdack; Peter K Endress; Merran L Matthews; Peter F Stevens; Sarah Mathews; Charles C Davis Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2012-10-08 Impact factor: 11.205