We would like to comment on a recent review article published in Sensors by Razak et al. [1]. The authors provided a review of plantar pressure measurement systems which included the discussion of the recently developed WalkinSense® system. While the authors correctly identified that our group completed research using this system [2], they have inaccurately reported the manufacturer of the system and our research findings.The authors stated that this system was developed by our group, however, as stated in our article [2], this system was developed by Tomorrow Options Microelectronics (Sheffield, UK). Additionally they stated inaccurately that the WalkinSense® system is similar to the F-Scan® (Tekscan, Boston, MA, USA) hardware and software and that our research concluded that WalkinSense® had a better repeatability when compared to other commercially available systems. Our research [2] clearly concluded that the WalkinSense® system was found to be as repeatable as the F-Scan® system.There are several papers which outline the existing technologies [3], the protocols used for data collection [4,5] and the repeatability of existing systems [6]. Whilst this paper [1], is mainly intended for a different audience when compared to clinical papers, it is very important that previously published information is carefully considered, critically reviewed and succinctly presented in a review paper.We felt compelled to write this note so that: (1) it is not misinterpreted that we developed this system and (2) our research findings are not inaccurately reported.We acknowledge your concerns and would like to apologize for the unintended errors in our paper [1] while quoting two points from Healy et al. [2]. Firstly, the manufacturer of the system is inaccurately identified. Secondly, our sentence “has a better repeatability compared to other commercially available systems” should rather read “equal repeatability compared to F-Scan system”.The corrections made are as listed below:On page 9896, lines 12–13, the sentence “has a better repeatability compared to other commercially available systems” should be “equal repeatability compared to the F-Scan® system”.On page 9897, lines 2–3, the sentence “It appears that only the sensor is their own development, the rest of the system is similar to F-Scan® (Tekscan, USA) hardware and software.” should be “The “WalkinSense” system was developed by Tomorrow Options Microelectronics (Sheffield, UK). This portable system's hardware includes eight individual sensors as well as a data acquisition and processing unit, whereas the proprietary software (WalkinSense version 0.96) records and displays plantar pressure profiles”.On page 9897, line 14, the sentence “developed their own transducer but seems to have a limited number of sensor placements” should be “has a limited number of sensor placements”.On page 9900, line 24, the sentence “used F-Scan® (Tekscan, USA) for the sensor” should be “used a low-cost pressure transducer”.