Literature DB >> 23485925

Classifying dogs' (Canis familiaris) facial expressions from photographs.

Tina Bloom1, Harris Friedman.   

Abstract

Humans accurately read other humans' emotional facial expressions. Little research was found examining human ability to read dogs' expressions. Cross-species research extended facial expression research to chimpanzees, and there is much research on dogs' auditory signaling to humans. To explore humans' ability to identify dogs' facial displays, photographs of a dog's face were taken under behaviorally defined conditions expected to elicit specific emotions. Dog experts consistently rated these photographs. The photographs rated as best by experts were used as stimuli for people experienced and inexperienced with dogs. Both groups were able to read the dog's emotions. Paradoxically, experienced people were less accurate reading aggressiveness. Experienced people were better identifying behaviorally defined situations. Research using behaviorally anchored, standardized photographs is recommended.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23485925     DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2013.02.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Processes        ISSN: 0376-6357            Impact factor:   1.777


  21 in total

1.  Separate brain areas for processing human and dog faces as revealed by awake fMRI in dogs (Canis familiaris).

Authors:  Andie M Thompkins; Bhavitha Ramaiahgari; Sinan Zhao; Sai Sheshan Roy Gotoor; Paul Waggoner; Thomas S Denney; Gopikrishna Deshpande; Jeffrey S Katz
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Humans process dog and human facial affect in similar ways.

Authors:  Annett Schirmer; Cui Shan Seow; Trevor B Penney
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Observed touch on a non-human face is not remapped onto the human observer's own face.

Authors:  Brianna Beck; Caterina Bertini; Cristina Scarpazza; Elisabetta Làdavas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Patterns of brain activation when mothers view their own child and dog: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Luke E Stoeckel; Lori S Palley; Randy L Gollub; Steven M Niemi; Anne Eden Evins
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Assessment of low-dose cisplatin as a model of nausea and emesis in beagle dogs, potential for repeated administration.

Authors:  Hannah Kenward; Ludovic Pelligand; Jonathan Elliott
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-05-04       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Dogs and humans respond to emotionally competent stimuli by producing different facial actions.

Authors:  Cátia Caeiro; Kun Guo; Daniel Mills
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Experience-based human perception of facial expressions in Barbary macaques (Macaca sylvanus).

Authors:  Laëtitia Maréchal; Xandria Levy; Kerstin Meints; Bonaventura Majolo
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Human Empathy, Personality and Experience Affect the Emotion Ratings of Dog and Human Facial Expressions.

Authors:  Miiamaaria V Kujala; Sanni Somppi; Markus Jokela; Outi Vainio; Lauri Parkkonen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  An Animal-Assisted Education Intervention with Dogs to Promote Emotion Comprehension in Primary School Children-The Federico II Model of Healthcare Zooanthropology.

Authors:  Cristiano Scandurra; Antonio Santaniello; Serena Cristiano; Fabrizio Mezza; Susanne Garzillo; Rosa Pizzo; Lucia Francesca Menna; Vincenzo Bochicchio
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-22       Impact factor: 2.752

10.  Dogs Evaluate Threatening Facial Expressions by Their Biological Validity--Evidence from Gazing Patterns.

Authors:  Sanni Somppi; Heini Törnqvist; Miiamaaria V Kujala; Laura Hänninen; Christina M Krause; Outi Vainio
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.