Literature DB >> 23485881

Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and clinimetric testing of instruments used to assess patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome in the Brazilian population.

Ronaldo Alves da Cunha1, Leonardo Oliveira Pena Costa, Luiz Carlos Hespanhol Junior, Raquel Simoni Pires, Urho M Kujala, Alexandre Dias Lopes.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Clinical measurement study.
OBJECTIVES: To cross-culturally adapt the Anterior Knee Pain Scale (AKPS), the Functional Index Questionnaire (FIQ), and the Pain Severity Scale (PSS) for patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS) into Brazilian Portuguese. This study also aimed to test the measurement properties of the AKPS, the FIQ, and the PSS, and the existing Brazilian Portuguese versions of the numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) and the Global Perceived Effect scale in a group with PFPS.
BACKGROUND: PFPS is a common condition. Therefore, translated, culturally adapted, and clinimetrically tested instruments for measuring PFPS are needed.
METHODS: The AKPS, FIQ, and PSS instruments were cross-culturally adapted into Brazilian Portuguese. The measurement properties of the AKPS, FIQ, PSS, NPRS, and Global Perceived Effect scale (internal consistency, ceiling and floor effects, and construct validity) were tested in 83 patients with PFPS. The reproducibility and responsiveness were tested in 52 patients with PFPS in a test-retest design, with follow-up testing at 48 to 72 hours and at 4 weeks after baseline.
RESULTS: The AKPS, the FIQ, and the PSS yielded adequate internal consistency (Cronbach alpha ranging from .75 to .87) and excellent reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients [model 2,1] ranging from 0.90 to 0.97). The AKPS and the PSS yielded very good agreement (standard error of measurement, 2.9% and 3.5%, respectively). The highest correlations were observed among the AKPS, the FIQ, and the PSS (Pearson r>0.60, P<.05). No floor or ceiling effects were observed for any of the instruments. Effect sizes used for measuring internal responsiveness ranged from moderate to high for all measures. The NPRS and the AKPS were the measures with the highest external responsiveness.
CONCLUSION: The Brazilian Portuguese versions of the AKPS, FIQ, PSS, NPRS, and Global Perceived Effect scale have acceptable measurement properties.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23485881     DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2013.4228

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther        ISSN: 0190-6011            Impact factor:   4.751


  14 in total

1.  Validation and cultural adaptation of "Kujala Score" in Spanish.

Authors:  Javier Gil-Gámez; Daniel Pecos-Martín; Urho M Kujala; Patricia Martínez-Merinero; Francisco Javier Montañez-Aguilera; Natalia Romero-Franco; Tomás Gallego-Izquierdo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Is hip strengthening the best treatment option for females with patellofemoral pain? A randomized controlled trial of three different types of exercises.

Authors:  Marcelo Camargo Saad; Rodrigo Antunes de Vasconcelos; Letícia Villani de Oliveira Mancinelli; Matheus Soares de Barros Munno; Rogério Ferreira Liporaci; Débora Bevilaqua Grossi
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale: Translation for portuguese language, cultural adaptation, and validation.

Authors:  Lgs Lenzi; Jbg Santos; J Raduan Neto; C H Fernandes; F Faloppa
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 3.315

4.  Brazilian version of the OSTRC Questionnaire on health problems (OSTRC-BR): translation, cross-cultural adaptation and measurement properties.

Authors:  Rafael Mirante Pimenta; Luiz Hespanhol; Alexandre Dias Lopes
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  Effects of proprioceptive exercises and strengthening on pain and functionality for patellofemoral pain syndrome in women: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Marcos Vinicius da Silva Boitrago; Nayara Nepomuceno de Mello; Fabrício Reichert Barin; Paulo Lobo Júnior; José Humberto de Souza Borges; Marcio Oliveira
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-04-19

6.  Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Properties Testing of the Arabic Anterior Knee Pain Scale.

Authors:  Abdullah Alshehri; Everett Lohman; Noha S Daher; Khalid Bahijri; Abdulmohsen Alghamdi; Nezar Altorairi; Arin Arnons; Abdullah Matar
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2017-04-01

7.  Propulsion phase of the single leg triple hop test in women with patellofemoral pain syndrome: a biomechanical study.

Authors:  Andre Serra Bley; João Carlos Ferrari Correa; Amir Curcio Dos Reis; Nayra Deise Dos Anjos Rabelo; Paulo Henrique Marchetti; Paulo Roberto Garcia Lucareli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Neuromuscular training and muscle strengthening in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome: a protocol of randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Nayra Deise Dos Anjos Rabelo; Bruna Lima; Amir Curcio dos Reis; André Serra Bley; Liu Chiao Yi; Thiago Yukio Fukuda; Leonardo Oliveira Pena Costa; Paulo Roberto Garcia Lucareli
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-05-16       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Q-angle in patellofemoral pain: relationship with dynamic knee valgus, hip abductor torque, pain and function.

Authors:  Gabriel Peixoto Leão Almeida; Ana Paula de Moura Campos Carvalho E Silva; Fábio Jorge Renovato França; Maurício Oliveira Magalhães; Thomaz Nogueira Burke; Amélia Pasqual Marques
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2016-02-09

10.  Validation of the German version of the Kujala score in patients with patellofemoral instability: a prospective multi-centre study.

Authors:  D Dammerer; M C Liebensteiner; U M Kujala; K Emmanuel; S Kopf; F Dirisamer; J M Giesinger
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 3.067

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.