Literature DB >> 23485831

Impact of associated significant aortic regurgitation on left ventricular remodeling and hemodynamic impairment in severe aortic valve stenosis.

Andreea Catarina Popescu1, Francesco Antonini-Canterin, Roxana Enache, Gian Luigi Nicolosi, Rita Piazza, Pompilio Faggiano, Matteo Cassin, Doina Dimulescu, Carmen Ginghină, Bogdan Alexandru Popescu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The left ventricular (LV) response to combined pressure and volume overload [aortic stenosis (AS) and aortic regurgitation (AR)] versus pressure overload (isolated AS)has not been systematically studied. We aimed to assess LV remodeling, functional and hemodynamic consequences inpatients with mixed aortic valve disease versus patients with isolated AS.
METHODS: We enrolled 181 patients (67 ± 9 years,109 men) with severe AS (aortic valve area indexed to body surface area <0.6 cm 2 /m 2 ) who underwent preoperative cardiac catheterization and a complete echocardiogram. Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP), LV end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) and pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) were measured.
RESULTS: One hundred and ten patients (group A)had isolated severe AS (AR 0–1) and 71 patients (group B)had mixed aortic valve disease (severe AS plus AR 2–3). Patients in group B were younger and in a higher New York Heart Association class (p < 0.01). Severity of AS was similar in both groups. Patients in group B had a higher indexed LV mass, a lower LV ejection fraction, and higher PCWP, LVED Pand PAP (all p ≤ 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with severe AS and significant AR are more symptomatic than patients with isolated severe AS. The increased burden due to the combined lesion induces pronounced LV remodeling and more severe hemodynamic consequences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23485831     DOI: 10.1159/000346623

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiology        ISSN: 0008-6312            Impact factor:   1.869


  4 in total

1.  fQRS as a noninvasive marker for an overgrowing epidemy affecting both aortic valve and myocardium in the era of aging population.

Authors:  Uğur Canpolat; Çağrı Yayla; Dursun Aras; Serkan Topaloğlu; Sinan Aydoğdu
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 1.468

2.  Outcomes of surgical aortic valve replacement for mixed aortic valve disease.

Authors:  Jennifer L Philip; Tiffany Zens; Lucian Lozonschi; Nilto C De Oliveira; Satoru Osaki; Takushi Kohmoto; Shahab A Akhter; Paul C Tang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 3.  The left ventricle in aortic stenosis--imaging assessment and clinical implications.

Authors:  Andreea Călin; Monica Roşca; Carmen Cristiana Beladan; Roxana Enache; Anca Doina Mateescu; Carmen Ginghină; Bogdan Alexandru Popescu
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 2.062

4.  Long-Term Outcomes in Patients With Mixed Aortic Valve Disease and Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction.

Authors:  Nicolas Isaza; Milind Y Desai; Samir R Kapadia; Amar Krishnaswamy; L Leonardo Rodriguez; Richard A Grimm; Julijana Z Conic; Yoshihito Saijo; Eric E Roselli; A Marc Gillinov; Douglas R Johnston; Lars G Svensson; Brian P Griffin; Zoran B Popović
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 5.501

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.