Literature DB >> 23485670

Compensation for research-related injury in NIH-sponsored HIV/AIDS clinical trials in Africa.

Nicole Mamotte, Douglas Wassenaar, Nivedhna Singh.   

Abstract

Concern has been voiced in the research ethics literature that under U.S. federal regulations U.S. sponsors, particularly the NIH, are not required to provide compensation for the treatment of research-related injury for trial participants or to allow grant funds to be used by investigators for appropriate insurance. This is problematic in developing country contexts because most participants are unlikely to have health insurance, resulting in overburdened and under-resourced health systems in many developing countries being responsible for providing care and treatment for research-related injury. This study provides preliminary insight into how respondent principal investigators of NIH-sponsored HIV/AIDS clinical trials in Africa and African research ethics committees deal with compensation for research-related injury. The majority of PIs surveyed provided free treatment for research-related injury, but few provided other forms of financial reparation to participants. The study also found that half of the PIs surveyed indicated that NIH funds were used for compensation, highlighting a contradiction between literature and practice. The majority of REC chairs surveyed indicated that their RECs routinely reviewed compensation plans for research-related injury and that their ethics application forms specifically requested information on compensation. Findings from one southern African country revealed that NIH funds were not used to provide treatment and/or financial reparation for research-related injury. Instead, PIs from this country relied on the government or the individual research participant (and/or their medical aid/health insurer) to cover the costs of research-related injury. The findings are discussed in the light of the recent (December 2011) U.S. Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethics report which recommends that research participants are morally entitled to compensation for research-related injury.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23485670     DOI: 10.1525/jer.2013.8.1.45

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics        ISSN: 1556-2646            Impact factor:   1.742


  4 in total

1.  Legal and ethical values in the resolution of research-related disputes: how can IRBS respond to participant complaints?

Authors:  Kristen Underhill
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.742

2.  Insurance in clinical research.

Authors:  Ravindra B Ghooi; Deepa Divekar
Journal:  Perspect Clin Res       Date:  2014-10

3.  Research ethics committees in a tight spot: Approving consent strategies for child research that are prima facie illegal but are ethical in terms of national guidelines.

Authors:  A E Strode; P P Singh; C M Slack; D R Wassenaar
Journal:  S Afr Med J       Date:  2018-10-02

4.  Disparate compensation policies for research related injury in an era of multinational trials: a case study of Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa.

Authors:  George Rugare Chingarande; Keymanthri Moodley
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2018-02-17       Impact factor: 2.652

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.