BACKGROUND: Hypertension is associated with antivascular endothelial growth factor treatment, but the clinical implications of hypertension are uncertain. To assess the prognostic and predictive value of bevacizumab-related hypertension, a comprehensive analysis of whether hypertension and efficacy outcomes are associated was conducted on seven company-sponsored placebo-controlled phase III studies of bevacizumab. METHODS: Patient-specific data were available from 6,486 patients with metastatic colorectal, breast, non-small cell lung, pancreatic, and renal cell cancers. Primary hypertension endpoint was a blood pressure (BP) increase of >20 mmHg systolic or >10mmHg diastolic within the first 60 days of treatment. Additional endpoints included other predefined thresholds of change in BP and severity of hypertension graded using the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. To analyze the general prognostic importance of an early BP increase, multivariate Cox regression models were used to assess the correlation between BP changes and progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) outcomes in the control groups. To analyze whether early BP increases could predict for benefit from bevacizumab, similar analyses were conducted in the bevacizumab-treated and control groups. RESULTS: In six of seven studies, early BP increase was neither predictive of clinical benefit from bevacizumab nor prognostic for the course of the disease. For study AVF2107g, early increased BP was associated with longer PFS and OS times in the bevacizumab group but shorter OS time in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Early treatment-related BP increases do not predict clinical benefit from bevacizumab based on PFS or OS outcomes. BP increases do not appear to have general prognostic importance for patients with advanced cancer.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Hypertension is associated with antivascular endothelial growth factor treatment, but the clinical implications of hypertension are uncertain. To assess the prognostic and predictive value of bevacizumab-related hypertension, a comprehensive analysis of whether hypertension and efficacy outcomes are associated was conducted on seven company-sponsored placebo-controlled phase III studies of bevacizumab. METHODS:Patient-specific data were available from 6,486 patients with metastatic colorectal, breast, non-small cell lung, pancreatic, and renal cell cancers. Primary hypertension endpoint was a blood pressure (BP) increase of >20 mmHg systolic or >10 mmHg diastolic within the first 60 days of treatment. Additional endpoints included other predefined thresholds of change in BP and severity of hypertension graded using the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. To analyze the general prognostic importance of an early BP increase, multivariate Cox regression models were used to assess the correlation between BP changes and progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) outcomes in the control groups. To analyze whether early BP increases could predict for benefit from bevacizumab, similar analyses were conducted in the bevacizumab-treated and control groups. RESULTS: In six of seven studies, early BP increase was neither predictive of clinical benefit from bevacizumab nor prognostic for the course of the disease. For study AVF2107g, early increased BP was associated with longer PFS and OS times in the bevacizumab group but shorter OS time in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Early treatment-related BP increases do not predict clinical benefit from bevacizumab based on PFS or OS outcomes. BP increases do not appear to have general prognostic importance for patients with advanced cancer.
Authors: Thomas G Pickering; John E Hall; Lawrence J Appel; Bonita E Falkner; John Graves; Martha N Hill; Daniel W Jones; Theodore Kurtz; Sheldon G Sheps; Edward J Roccella Journal: Hypertension Date: 2004-12-20 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: J A Staessen; L Bieniaszewski; E O'Brien; P Gosse; H Hayashi; Y Imai; T Kawasaki; K Otsuka; P Palatini; L Thijs; R Fagard Journal: Hypertension Date: 1997-01 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Hedy L Kindler; Gregory Friberg; Deepti A Singh; Gershon Locker; Sreenivasa Nattam; Mark Kozloff; David A Taber; Theodore Karrison; Abraham Dachman; Walter M Stadler; Everett E Vokes Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-11-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: James J Vredenburgh; Annick Desjardins; James E Herndon; Jeannette M Dowell; David A Reardon; Jennifer A Quinn; Jeremy N Rich; Sith Sathornsumetee; Sridharan Gururangan; Melissa Wagner; Darell D Bigner; Allan H Friedman; Henry S Friedman Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2007-02-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Aram V Chobanian; George L Bakris; Henry R Black; William C Cushman; Lee A Green; Joseph L Izzo; Daniel W Jones; Barry J Materson; Suzanne Oparil; Jackson T Wright; Edward J Roccella Journal: JAMA Date: 2003-05-14 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Herbert Hurwitz; Louis Fehrenbacher; William Novotny; Thomas Cartwright; John Hainsworth; William Heim; Jordan Berlin; Ari Baron; Susan Griffing; Eric Holmgren; Napoleone Ferrara; Gwen Fyfe; Beth Rogers; Robert Ross; Fairooz Kabbinavar Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-06-03 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Giuseppe Mancia; Guy De Backer; Anna Dominiczak; Renata Cifkova; Robert Fagard; Giuseppe Germano; Guido Grassi; Anthony M Heagerty; Sverre E Kjeldsen; Stephane Laurent; Krzysztof Narkiewicz; Luis Ruilope; Andrzej Rynkiewicz; Roland E Schmieder; Harry A J Struijker Boudier; Alberto Zanchetti; Alec Vahanian; John Camm; Raffaele De Caterina; Veronica Dean; Kenneth Dickstein; Gerasimos Filippatos; Christian Funck-Brentano; Irene Hellemans; Steen Dalby Kristensen; Keith McGregor; Udo Sechtem; Sigmund Silber; Michal Tendera; Petr Widimsky; Jose Luis Zamorano; Sverre E Kjeldsen; Serap Erdine; Krzysztof Narkiewicz; Wolfgang Kiowski; Enrico Agabiti-Rosei; Ettore Ambrosioni; Renata Cifkova; Anna Dominiczak; Robert Fagard; Anthony M Heagerty; Stephane Laurent; Lars H Lindholm; Giuseppe Mancia; Athanasios Manolis; Peter M Nilsson; Josep Redon; Roland E Schmieder; Harry A J Struijker-Boudier; Margus Viigimaa; Gerasimos Filippatos; Stamatis Adamopoulos; Enrico Agabiti-Rosei; Ettore Ambrosioni; Vicente Bertomeu; Denis Clement; Serap Erdine; Csaba Farsang; Dan Gaita; Wolfgang Kiowski; Gregory Lip; Jean-Michel Mallion; Athanasios J Manolis; Peter M Nilsson; Eoin O'Brien; Piotr Ponikowski; Josep Redon; Frank Ruschitzka; Juan Tamargo; Pieter van Zwieten; Margus Viigimaa; Bernard Waeber; Bryan Williams; Jose Luis Zamorano Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2007-06-11 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: James J Vredenburgh; Annick Desjardins; James E Herndon; Jennifer Marcello; David A Reardon; Jennifer A Quinn; Jeremy N Rich; Sith Sathornsumetee; Sridharan Gururangan; John Sampson; Melissa Wagner; Leighann Bailey; Darell D Bigner; Allan H Friedman; Henry S Friedman Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-10-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: S N Holden; S G Eckhardt; R Basser; R de Boer; D Rischin; M Green; M A Rosenthal; C Wheeler; A Barge; H I Hurwitz Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2005-05-19 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Shubham Pant; Ludmila K Martin; Susan Geyer; Lai Wei; Katherine Van Loon; Nili Sommovilla; Mark Zalupski; Renuka Iyer; David Fogelman; Andrew H Ko; Tanios Bekaii-Saab Journal: Am J Clin Oncol Date: 2016-12 Impact factor: 2.339
Authors: L Manso; F Moreno; R Márquez; B Castelo; A Arcediano; M Arroyo; A I Ballesteros; I Calvo; M J Echarri; S Enrech; A Gómez; R González Del Val; E López-Miranda; M Martín-Angulo; N Martínez-Jañez; C Olier; P Zamora Journal: Curr Oncol Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 3.677