Literature DB >> 23485584

Exposing cells to H2O2: a quantitative comparison between continuous low-dose and one-time high-dose treatments.

Mirko C Sobotta1, Ana G Barata, Ulrich Schmidt, Sebastian Mueller, Gunda Millonig, Tobias P Dick.   

Abstract

Most studies investigating the influence of H2O2 on cells in culture apply nonphysiological concentrations over nonphysiological time periods (i.e., a one-time bolus that is metabolized in minutes). As an alternative, the glucose oxidase/catalase (GOX/CAT) system allows application of physiologically relevant H2O2 concentrations (300nM-10µM) over physiologically relevant time periods (up to 24h). Recent findings suggest that bolus and GOX/CAT treatments can lead to opposing cellular responses, thus warranting a quantitative comparison between the two approaches. First, we established a reaction-diffusion model that can predict the behavior of the GOX/CAT system with spatiotemporal resolution, thus aiding selection of optimal experimental conditions for its application. Measurements of H2O2 concentration in the cellular supernatant with the luminol/hypochlorite system were consistent with the predictions of the model. Second, we compared the impact of bolus and GOX/CAT treatments on cytosolic H2O2 levels over time. Intracellular H2O2 was monitored by the response of the thiol peroxidase Prx2 and the H2O2 sensor roGFP2-Orp1. We found that Prx2 rapidly and reversibly responds to submicromolar H2O2 levels and accurately reflects kinetic competition with cellular catalase. Our measurements reveal fundamental differences in the dynamic response of cellular H2O2 concentrations following either bolus or GOX/CAT treatments. Thus, different, or even opposing, biological outcomes from differing means of H2O2 delivery may be expected. Cellular responses induced by bolus treatment may not occur under GOX/CAT conditions, and vice versa.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23485584     DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2013.02.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med        ISSN: 0891-5849            Impact factor:   7.376


  36 in total

1.  Using Sensors and Generators of H2O2 to Elucidate the Toxicity Mechanism of Piperlongumine and Phenethyl Isothiocyanate.

Authors:  Beijing K Huang; Troy F Langford; Hadley D Sikes
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 8.401

2.  A unique model for SDH-deficient GIST: an endocrine-related cancer.

Authors:  James F Powers; Brent Cochran; James D Baleja; Hadley D Sikes; Xue Zhang; Inna Lomakin; Troy Langford; Kassi Taylor Stein; Arthur S Tischler
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 5.678

3.  AP39, a novel mitochondria-targeted hydrogen sulfide donor, stimulates cellular bioenergetics, exerts cytoprotective effects and protects against the loss of mitochondrial DNA integrity in oxidatively stressed endothelial cells in vitro.

Authors:  Bartosz Szczesny; Katalin Módis; Kazunori Yanagi; Ciro Coletta; Sophie Le Trionnaire; Alexis Perry; Mark E Wood; Matthew Whiteman; Csaba Szabo
Journal:  Nitric Oxide       Date:  2014-04-19       Impact factor: 4.427

4.  Real-time monitoring of basal H2O2 levels with peroxiredoxin-based probes.

Authors:  Bruce Morgan; Koen Van Laer; Theresa N E Owusu; Daria Ezeriņa; Daniel Pastor-Flores; Prince Saforo Amponsah; Anja Tursch; Tobias P Dick
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 15.040

5.  Peroxiredoxin-2 and STAT3 form a redox relay for H2O2 signaling.

Authors:  Mirko C Sobotta; Willy Liou; Sarah Stöcker; Deepti Talwar; Michael Oehler; Thomas Ruppert; Annette N D Scharf; Tobias P Dick
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2014-11-24       Impact factor: 15.040

Review 6.  Redox Paradox: A Novel Approach to Therapeutics-Resistant Cancer.

Authors:  Luksana Chaiswing; William H St Clair; Daret K St Clair
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 8.401

7.  Nitration transforms a sensitive peroxiredoxin 2 into a more active and robust peroxidase.

Authors:  Lía M Randall; Bruno Manta; Martín Hugo; Magdalena Gil; Carlos Batthyàny; Madia Trujillo; Leslie B Poole; Ana Denicola
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Speciation of reactive sulfur species and their reactions with alkylating agents: do we have any clue about what is present inside the cell?

Authors:  Virág Bogdándi; Tomoaki Ida; Thomas R Sutton; Christopher Bianco; Tamás Ditrói; Grielof Koster; Hillary A Henthorn; Magda Minnion; John P Toscano; Albert van der Vliet; Michael D Pluth; Martin Feelisch; Jon M Fukuto; Takaaki Akaike; Péter Nagy
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 8.739

9.  Redox processes inform multivariate transdifferentiation trajectories associated with TGFβ-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition.

Authors:  Adam F Prasanphanich; C Andrew Arencibia; Melissa L Kemp
Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 7.376

Review 10.  Role of metabolic H2O2 generation: redox signaling and oxidative stress.

Authors:  Helmut Sies
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 5.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.