Literature DB >> 23485367

Magnetic-motor-root stimulation: review.

Hideyuki Matsumoto1, Ritsuko Hanajima, Yasuo Terao, Yoshikazu Ugawa.   

Abstract

Magnetic stimulation can activate the human central and peripheral nervous systems non-invasively and virtually painlessly. Magnetic stimulation over the spinal enlargements can activate spinal nerves at the neuroforamina (magnetic-neuroforamina stimulation). This stimulation method provides us with information related to the latency of compound-muscle action potential (CMAP), which is usually interpreted as peripheral motor-conduction time (PMCT). However, this stimulation method has faced several problems in clinical applications. One is that supramaximal CMAPs were unobtainable. Another is that magnetic stimulation did not usually activate the spinal nerves in the spinal canal, i.e., the cauda equina, which prevented an evaluation of its conduction. For these reasons, magnetic-neuroforamina stimulation was rarely used to evaluate the conduction of peripheral nerves. It was mainly used to evaluate the conduction of the corticospinal tract using the parameter of central motor-conduction time (CMCT), which was calculated by subtracting PMCT from the latency of motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the primary motor cortex. Recently, supramaximal stimulation has been achieved in magnetic-neuroforamina stimulation, and this has contributed to the measurement of both CMAP size and latency. The achievement of supramaximal stimulation is ascribed to the increase in magnetic-stimulator output and a novel coil, the magnetic augmented translumbosacral stimulation (MATS) coil. The most proximal part of the cauda equina can be reliably activated using the MATS coil (magnetic-conus stimulation), thus contributing to the measurement of cauda equina conduction time (CECT) and cortico-conus motor-conduction time (CCCT). These recent developments in magnetic-motor-root stimulation enable us to more precisely evaluate the conduction of the proximal part of peripheral nerves and that of the corticospinal tract for lower-limb muscles. In this review article, we summarise the basic mechanisms, recent topics, clinical applications, comparison to electrical stimulation, pitfalls, safety and additional issues in magnetic-motor-root stimulation.
Copyright © 2013 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23485367     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2012.12.049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  15 in total

1.  Motor cortical excitability in peritoneal dialysis: a single-pulse TMS study.

Authors:  Hideyuki Matsumoto; Katsunori Saito; Yuko Konoma; Shingo Okabe; Yoshikazu Ugawa; Yoshitaka Ishibashi
Journal:  J Physiol Sci       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 2.781

2.  Thirty Years of Magnetic Stimulation: Is it Still Only for the Purpose of Research?

Authors:  A Emre Öge
Journal:  Noro Psikiyatr Ars       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 1.339

3.  Volitional walking via upper limb muscle-controlled stimulation of the lumbar locomotor center in man.

Authors:  Syusaku Sasada; Kenji Kato; Suguru Kadowaki; Stefan J Groiss; Yoshikazu Ugawa; Tomoyoshi Komiyama; Yukio Nishimura
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Spinal electro-magnetic stimulation combined with transgene delivery of neurotrophin NT-3 and exercise: novel combination therapy for spinal contusion injury.

Authors:  Hayk A Petrosyan; Valentina Alessi; Arsen S Hunanyan; Sue A Sisto; Victor L Arvanian
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Translumbosacral Anorectal Magnetic Stimulation Test for Fecal Incontinence.

Authors:  Yun Yan; Amol Sharma; Anam A Herekar; Enoe Jimenez; Amit R Hudgi; Qiaochu G Gu; Satish S C Rao
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  Detection of C8/T1 radiculopathy by measuring the root motor conduction time.

Authors:  Dougho Park; Sang-Eok Lee; Jae Man Cho; Joong Won Yang; Donghoon Yang; Mansu Kim; Heum Dai Kwon
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2022-10-20       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 7.  The Role of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation as a Surrogate Marker of Disease Activity in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis: A Literature Review.

Authors:  Muhannad M Alsharidah; Mohammad Uzair; Sarah S Alseneidi; Afnan A Alkharan; Reem Fahd Bunyan; Shahid Bashir
Journal:  Innov Clin Neurosci       Date:  2022 Jan-Mar

Review 8.  An update on anorectal disorders for gastroenterologists.

Authors:  Adil E Bharucha; Satish S C Rao
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  Effects of differences in age and body height on normal values of central motor conduction time determined by F-waves.

Authors:  Yasuaki Imajo; Tsukasa Kanchiku; Hidenori Suzuki; Yuichiro Yoshida; Masahiro Funaba; Norihiro Nishida; Kazuhiro Fujimoto; Toshihiko Taguchi
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 1.985

10.  Difference in Pain and Discomfort of Comparable Wrist Movements Induced by Magnetic or Electrical Stimulation for Peripheral Nerves in the Dorsal Forearm.

Authors:  Genji Abe; Hideki Oyama; Zhenyi Liao; Keita Honda; Kenji Yashima; Akihiko Asao; Shin-Ichi Izumi
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2020-12-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.