Literature DB >> 23485297

Disagreement between theory and experiment grows with increasing rotational excitation of HD(v', j') product for the H + D2 reaction.

Justin Jankunas1, Mahima Sneha, Richard N Zare, Foudhil Bouakline, Stuart C Althorpe.   

Abstract

The Photoloc technique has been employed to measure the state-resolved differential cross sections of the HD(v', j(')) product in the reaction H + D2 over a wide range of collision energies and internal states. The experimental results were compared with fully dimensional, time-dependent quantum mechanical calculations on the refined Boothroyd-Keogh-Martin-Peterson potential energy surface. We find nearly perfect agreement between theory and experiment for HD(v', j(')) product states with low to medium rotational excitation, e.g., HD(v' = 1, j(') = 3) at a collision energy, Ecoll, of 1.72 eV, HD(v' = 1, j(') = 3, 5) at Ecoll = 1.97 eV, and HD(v' = 3, j(') = 3) at Ecoll = 1.97 eV. As the rotational angular momentum, j('), of HD(v', j(')) increases, the agreement between theoretical predictions and experimental measurements worsens but not in a simple fashion. A moderate disagreement between theory and experiment has been found for HD(v' = 0, j(') = 12) at Ecoll = 1.76 eV and increased monotonically for HD(v' = 0, j(') = 13) at Ecoll = 1.74 eV, HD(v' = 0, j(') = 14) at Ecoll = 1.72 eV, and HD(v' = 0, j(') = 15) at Ecoll = 1.70 eV. Disagreement was not limited to vibrationless HD(v', j(')) product states: HD(v' = 1, j(') = 12) at Ecoll = 1.60 eV and HD(v' = 3, j(') = 8, 10) at Ecoll = 1.97 eV followed a similar trend. Theoretical calculations suggest more sideways∕forward scattering than has been observed experimentally for high j(') HD(v', j(')) states. The source of this discrepancy is presently unknown but might be the result of inaccuracy in the potential energy surface.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23485297     DOI: 10.1063/1.4793557

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Phys        ISSN: 0021-9606            Impact factor:   3.488


  3 in total

1.  Is the simplest chemical reaction really so simple?

Authors:  Justin Jankunas; Mahima Sneha; Richard N Zare; Foudhil Bouakline; Stuart C Althorpe; Diego Herráez-Aguilar; F Javier Aoiz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Quantum interference between H + D2 quasiclassical reaction mechanisms.

Authors:  Pablo G Jambrina; Diego Herráez-Aguilar; F Javier Aoiz; Mahima Sneha; Justinas Jankunas; Richard N Zare
Journal:  Nat Chem       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 24.427

3.  Effects of reagent rotation on interferences in the product angular distributions of chemical reactions.

Authors:  P G Jambrina; J Aldegunde; F J Aoiz; M Sneha; R N Zare
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 9.825

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.