| Literature DB >> 23483973 |
Yong Jiang1, Jian Jun Tang, Bao Qiang Wu, Bo Yuan, Zhen Qu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The present study was aimed to investigate the protective effects of different-time-ischemic preconditioning on the reperfusion injury in fatty livers in rats, and to elucidate the mechanisms underlying the protective effects and the optimal safe ischemic preconditioning time on the hepatic IR injury in steatotic livers. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPALEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23483973 PMCID: PMC3590118 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058086
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Animal groups and treatments.
| Group | Diet | Preconditioning | Title | |
| Ischemia | Reperfusion | |||
| A | Normal | Non-preconditioning | IR | |
| B | 10 min | 10 min | IP-10 | |
| C | High-fat | Non-preconditioning | IR | |
| D | 10 min | 10 min | IP-10 | |
| E | 15 min | 10 min | IP-15 | |
| F | 5 min | 10 min | IP-5 | |
| G | 8 min | 10 min | IP-8 | |
Concentration of ALT, AST, LDH, and NO at 4 h after the ischemia-reperfusion injury (x±s).
| Indicator | Control | Fatty liver | |||||
| A | B | C | D | E | F | G | |
| AST (U/L) | 326.5±227.4 | 262.3±149.9 | 759.3±120.6 | 514.8±88.2 | 706.4±72.4 | 460.3±54.5 | 391.4±89.3 |
| ALT (U/L) | 205.7±32.6 | 196.1±38.5 | 440.9±30.7 | 308.2±55.9 | 328.7±34.7 | 219.5±46.9 | 243.5±28.8 |
| LDH (U/ML) | 29.5±6.4 | 22.3±2.4 | 64.3±5.6 | 57.9±5.9 | 57.0±5.5 | 39.6±3.4 | 35.1±4.5 |
| NO (µmol/L) | 11.4±8.5 | 141.5±10.3 | 31.7±13.3 | 57.4±9.2 | 59.0±13.6 | 84.2±25.5 | 71.8±16.6 |
P<0.05, compared to the control group;
P<0.05, compared to the groups D and E.
Changes in the concentration of MDA, SOD, and MPO in response to the ischemia-reperfusion injury (x±s).
| Indicators | Control | Fatty liver | |||||
| A | B | C | D | E | F | G | |
| MDA(nmol/ml) | 0.52±0.03 | 0.44±0.09 | 0.89±0.30 | 0.64±0.19 | 0.69±0.27 | 0.50±0.41 | 0.54±0.32 |
| SOD(U/mgprot) | 169.54±5.60 | 186.77±4.41 | 123.82±6.42 | 158.44±7.58 | 131.72±2.68 | 169.04±6.35 | 167.19±8.98 |
| MPO(U/gprot) | 1.42±0.32 | 1.20±0.42 | 3.05±0.28 | 2.26±0.31 | 2.82±0.35 | 1.53±0.26 | 1.75±0.23 |
P<0.05, compared to the groups C, D, and E.