Literature DB >> 23483742

Unraveling the physiological functions of exosome secretion by tumors.

Angélique Bobrie1, Clotilde Théry.   

Abstract

To understand the physiological functions of exosomes, we have recently used the inhibition of Rab27a, which prevents exosome release but also alters other secretion pathways. Our work demonstrates that the secretion of exosomes by some tumors in vivo can influence the immune microenvironment to promote tumor progression, but also that this phenomenon cannot be generalized to all tumors and all exosomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Rab27a; exosomes; extracellular vesicles; tumor immunity

Year:  2013        PMID: 23483742      PMCID: PMC3583924          DOI: 10.4161/onci.22565

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncoimmunology        ISSN: 2162-4011            Impact factor:   8.110


Exosomes are a particular type of membrane vesicles that most cells secrete in their extracellular environment. Whereas other vesicles are released by direct budding from the plasma membrane (Fig. 1), exosomes are secreted in a two-step process whereby vesicles form inside the lumen of endosomes, which then fuse with the plasma membrane to release in the extracellular environment such inner vesicles.

Figure 1. Secretion of multiple types of extracellular vesicles. Cells simultaneously release membrane-enclosed vesicles formed either by direct budding of the plasma membrane (microvesicles, ectosomes, microparticles…) or by initial formation inside multivesicular endosomal compartments followed by fusion with the plasma membrane (exosomes). We have shown that Rab27a is required for the secretion of exosomes, but that other vesicles that are co-purified with exosomes by the classical ultracentrifugation protocol (and thus exhibit a comparable size) are secreted in a Rab27a-independent manner. Whether these latter vesicles are formed in other types of multivesicular compartments, or directly bud off the plasma membrane remains elusive.

Figure 1. Secretion of multiple types of extracellular vesicles. Cells simultaneously release membrane-enclosed vesicles formed either by direct budding of the plasma membrane (microvesicles, ectosomes, microparticles…) or by initial formation inside multivesicular endosomal compartments followed by fusion with the plasma membrane (exosomes). We have shown that Rab27a is required for the secretion of exosomes, but that other vesicles that are co-purified with exosomes by the classical ultracentrifugation protocol (and thus exhibit a comparable size) are secreted in a Rab27a-independent manner. Whether these latter vesicles are formed in other types of multivesicular compartments, or directly bud off the plasma membrane remains elusive. In the 1980s, exosomes were only suggested to serve as means to eliminate unwanted components, e.g., plasma membrane receptors during the maturation of reticulocytes. A more complex function of exosomes emerged in the late 1990s, when exosomes secreted by antigen-presenting cells were shown to activate T lymphocytes, hence inducing immune responses., Indeed, once released in the extracellular environment, exosomes can bind to cell surface receptors and/or be internalized by/fuse with a target cell. The cargo of exosomes, including specific proteins, lipids and nucleic acids, can then promote various forms of intracellular signaling. Exosomes are nowadays considered as conveyors of messages from one cell to another. In particular, the function of exosome release in the context of tumor development has been the subject of intensive research during the past 14 years. Tumor cells can secrete exosomes, which, initially, were shown to constitute a prominent source of tumor antigens for dendritic cells (DCs) to induce antitumor immune responses. Although many groups confirmed these observations, especially for exosomes secreted by stressed tumor cells, subsequent studies were published demonstrating that tumor exosomes also can inhibit antitumor immune responses, notably by preventing efficient T-cell, natural killer (NK)-cell, or DC activation, and/or by promoting the development of immunosuppressive cells such as regulatory T cells (Tregs) and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (reviewed in Ref.). More recently, additional pro-tumoral effects of exosomes have been demonstrated, including their ability to promote angiogenesis and metastasis. Of note, all these studies analyzed the in vitro or in vivo functions of exosomes that had been purified and concentrated in vitro. Hence, the actual outcome of the secretion of exosomes by tumor cells in a truly physiological setting remained unknown. To bypass this artifactual situation, we have recently started to manipulate tumor cells in vitro, to affect in a stable manner exosome release, and then to analyze in vivo their behavior, in terms of growth and interaction with the immune system. By performing a mid-scale screen of a library of short hairpin (sh)RNA, we demonstrated that the depletion of RAB27A, a protein involved in intracellular trafficking, leads to a drastic reduction in the release of exosomes, but not of soluble proteins, by human cervical carcinoma HeLa cells. We thus used this tool to limit exosome secretion in two mouse mammary carcinoma cell lines, stably transfectiong them with a Rab27a-specific shRNA., These malignant cell lines were then subcutaneously injected in immunocompetent mice and tumor progression was monitored. Interestingly, 4T1 cell-derived control tumors grew progressively and formed metastases, whereas those in which Rab27a expression was inhibited developed poorly. By combining the in vitro depletion of exosomes (by the ultracentrifugation of conditioned medium) with their in vivo injection into growing Rab27a-depleted tumors, we could demonstrate that a combination of tumor exosomes and tumor-derived soluble factors promoted the differentiation, recruitment into the tumor and/or activation of neutrophils that were required for tumor growth. Of note, no role of adaptive immunity and NK cells was evidenced in our model of Rab27a-dependent 4T1 tumor progression. In the TS/A model, however, Rab27a inhibition did not prevent tumor growth, nor did it affect the immune microenvironment. Accordingly, we did not observe a positive role for TS/A exosomes in tumor progression. We showed that TS/A cells secrete a different array of soluble factors and functionally different exosomes as compared with 4T1 cells, and that they do not rely on neutrophils for in vivo progression. In summary, our work conclusively demonstrates for the first time that a physiological secretion of exosomes in vivo can promote tumor progression, but it also highlights the variability of exosome functions, which depend on the intrinsic microenvironment of each tumor. Importantly, by analyzing the general secretome of Rab27a-depleted cells, we showed that the secretion of a subset of exosome-independent soluble proteins was also modified. In particular, the absence of Rab27a abolished the secretion of the metalloproteinase 9 (MMP9), which is required for efficient metastatic colonization of 4T1 cells. Therefore, Rab27a is not a truly specific target to modulate the secretion of exosomes, and complementary experiments must be performed, as we did, to unravel the relative contributions of exosomes and soluble factors to the phenotype observed upon Rab27a depletion. Finally, it is important to note that cells simultaneously secrete different types of vesicles, originating from different intracellular locations (Fig. 1). In our opinion, because of the specific intracellular site of exosome formation, their constitutive components differ from those found in vesicles budding from the plasma membrane, and the functions of exosomes and of the other secreted vesicles must be different. We and others have recently evidenced that vesicles obtained with the classical differential ultracentrifugation method are heterogeneous in their size, density, composition and biogenesis (i.e. some depend on Rab27a for their secretion while others do not)., We are now trying to understand if all these vesicles are different kinds of exosomes coming from different types of intracellular multivesicular compartments, or if some are instead released directly from the plasma membrane (Fig. 1). The next challenge for the field will be to develop new protocols/tools to separate to purity the different types of extracellular vesicles released by a single type of tumor cell, and to compare side-by-side their physiological functions. Refining our knowledge on the nature, composition and function of extracellular vesicles will help us to improve their use as diagnostic markers and perhaps antitumor agents.
  10 in total

1.  Eradication of established murine tumors using a novel cell-free vaccine: dendritic cell-derived exosomes.

Authors:  L Zitvogel; A Regnault; A Lozier; J Wolfers; C Flament; D Tenza; P Ricciardi-Castagnoli; G Raposo; S Amigorena
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 2.  Exosome secretion: molecular mechanisms and roles in immune responses.

Authors:  Angélique Bobrie; Marina Colombo; Graça Raposo; Clotilde Théry
Journal:  Traffic       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 6.215

3.  Tumor-derived exosomes are a source of shared tumor rejection antigens for CTL cross-priming.

Authors:  J Wolfers; A Lozier; G Raposo; A Regnault; C Théry; C Masurier; C Flament; S Pouzieux; F Faure; T Tursz; E Angevin; S Amigorena; L Zitvogel
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 4.  Exosomes and immune surveillance of neoplastic lesions: a review.

Authors:  H-G Zhang; X Zhuang; D Sun; Y Liu; X Xiang; W E Grizzle
Journal:  Biotech Histochem       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 1.718

5.  Vesicle formation during reticulocyte maturation. Association of plasma membrane activities with released vesicles (exosomes).

Authors:  R M Johnstone; M Adam; J R Hammond; L Orr; C Turbide
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1987-07-05       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Identification of distinct populations of prostasomes that differentially express prostate stem cell antigen, annexin A1, and GLIPR2 in humans.

Authors:  Marian Aalberts; Federica M F van Dissel-Emiliani; Nick P H van Adrichem; Merel van Wijnen; Marca H M Wauben; Tom A E Stout; Willem Stoorvogel
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 4.285

7.  Rab27a and Rab27b control different steps of the exosome secretion pathway.

Authors:  Matias Ostrowski; Nuno B Carmo; Sophie Krumeich; Isabelle Fanget; Graça Raposo; Ariel Savina; Catarina F Moita; Kristine Schauer; Alistair N Hume; Rui P Freitas; Bruno Goud; Philippe Benaroch; Nir Hacohen; Mitsunori Fukuda; Claire Desnos; Miguel C Seabra; François Darchen; Sebastian Amigorena; Luis F Moita; Clotilde Thery
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2009-12-06       Impact factor: 28.824

8.  Rab27a supports exosome-dependent and -independent mechanisms that modify the tumor microenvironment and can promote tumor progression.

Authors:  Angélique Bobrie; Sophie Krumeich; Fabien Reyal; Chiara Recchi; Luis F Moita; Miguel C Seabra; Matias Ostrowski; Clotilde Théry
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Diverse subpopulations of vesicles secreted by different intracellular mechanisms are present in exosome preparations obtained by differential ultracentrifugation.

Authors:  Angélique Bobrie; Marina Colombo; Sophie Krumeich; Graça Raposo; Clotilde Théry
Journal:  J Extracell Vesicles       Date:  2012-04-16

10.  B lymphocytes secrete antigen-presenting vesicles.

Authors:  G Raposo; H W Nijman; W Stoorvogel; R Liejendekker; C V Harding; C J Melief; H J Geuze
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1996-03-01       Impact factor: 14.307

  10 in total
  21 in total

Review 1.  Defining the roles for Vpr in HIV-1-associated neuropathogenesis.

Authors:  Tony James; Michael R Nonnemacher; Brian Wigdahl; Fred C Krebs
Journal:  J Neurovirol       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 2.643

Review 2.  Tumor-Derived Exosomes and Their Role in Cancer Progression.

Authors:  Theresa L Whiteside
Journal:  Adv Clin Chem       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 5.394

3.  Social networking in tumor cell communities is associated with increased aggressiveness.

Authors:  Catalina Lodillinsky; Katrina Podsypanina; Philippe Chavrier
Journal:  Intravital       Date:  2016-01-21

4.  Eavesdropping on altered cell-to-cell signaling in cancer by secretome profiling.

Authors:  David J Klinke
Journal:  Mol Cell Oncol       Date:  2015-04-14

Review 5.  Pancreatic cancer diagnosis by free and exosomal miRNA.

Authors:  Margot Zöller
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol       Date:  2013-11-15

6.  Exosome Secretion by the Parasitic Protozoan Leishmania within the Sand Fly Midgut.

Authors:  Vanessa Diniz Atayde; Hamide Aslan; Shannon Townsend; Kasra Hassani; Shaden Kamhawi; Martin Olivier
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 9.423

Review 7.  The role of exosomes and MYC in therapy resistance of acute myeloid leukemia: Challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Nithya Mudgapalli; Palanisamy Nallasamy; Haritha Chava; Srinivas Chava; Anup S Pathania; Venugopal Gunda; Santhi Gorantla; Manoj K Pandey; Subash C Gupta; Kishore B Challagundla
Journal:  Mol Aspects Med       Date:  2019-10-14

Review 8.  Enhancing the discovery and development of immunotherapies for cancer using quantitative and systems pharmacology: Interleukin-12 as a case study.

Authors:  David J Klinke
Journal:  J Immunother Cancer       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 13.751

9.  Extracellular Membrane Vesicles Derived from 143B Osteosarcoma Cells Contain Pro-Osteoclastogenic Cargo: A Novel Communication Mechanism in Osteosarcoma Bone Microenvironment.

Authors:  Rama Garimella; Laurie Washington; Janalee Isaacson; Julian Vallejo; Madoka Spence; Ossama Tawfik; Peter Rowe; Marco Brotto; Raymond Perez
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 4.243

10.  Long-distance communication between laryngeal carcinoma cells.

Authors:  Ieva Antanavičiūtė; Kristina Rysevaitė; Vykintas Liutkevičius; Alina Marandykina; Lina Rimkutė; Renata Sveikatienė; Virgilijus Uloza; Vytenis Arvydas Skeberdis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.