Literature DB >> 23483714

Management of pregnant patients who refuse medically indicated cesarean delivery.

Neha A Deshpande, Corrina M Oxford.   

Abstract

The doctrine of informed refusal may become difficult to adhere to in obstetric practice, especially in situations in which the fetus's life is at risk. One rare yet potentially problematic situation of informed refusal is the case of a pregnant woman who refuses to undergo a medically indicated cesarean delivery that would ensure the well-being of her fetus. Although some would argue that patient autonomy takes precedence and the woman's informed refusal should be respected, others would argue that beneficence, justice, and doing no harm to the viable fetus should ethically overrule the refusal of a surgery. This article explores the profound conflict between maternal autonomy and the rights of the fetus, provides a framework to address when the two diverge, and poses suggestions for how providers can better navigate this dilemma.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cesarean delivery; Ethics; Fetal risk management; Informed refusal; Intervention

Year:  2012        PMID: 23483714      PMCID: PMC3594862     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 1941-2797


  10 in total

1.  Legal dimensions of maternal-fetal conflict.

Authors:  L J Nelson
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 2.190

2.  Court-ordered cesarean sections receive judicial defeat.

Authors:  W J Curran
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1990-08-16       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Legal interventions during pregnancy. Court-ordered medical treatments and legal penalties for potentially harmful behavior by pregnant women.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-11-28       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Patient choice: maternal-fetal conflict. Committee on Ethics. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

Authors: 
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  1990

5.  American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Bioethics: Fetal therapy: ethical considerations.

Authors: 
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 6.  Compelled medical treatment of pregnant women. Life, liberty, and law in conflict.

Authors:  L J Nelson; N Milliken
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988-02-19       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Lives at stake. How to respond to a woman's refusal of cesarean surgery when she risks losing her child or her life.

Authors:  C A Tauer
Journal:  Health Prog       Date:  1992-09

8.  The rights of "Unborn children" and the value of pregnant women.

Authors:  Howard Minkoff; Lynn M Paltrow
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.683

9.  Can cesarean section be performed without the woman's consent?

Authors:  Kristin Lyng; Aslak Syse; Per E Børdahl
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.636

10.  Refusal of treatment in obstetrics - A maternal-fetal conflict.

Authors:  Iris Ohel; Ohel Iris; Amalia Levy; Levy Amalia; Moshe Mazor; Mazor Moshe; Arnon Wiznitzer; Wiznitzer Arnon; Eyal Sheiner; Sheiner Eyal
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2009-07
  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Impact of Statewide Mandatory Medicaid Managed Care (SMMC) Programs on Hospital Obstetric Outcomes.

Authors:  Hasan Symum; José Zayas-Castro
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-09

2.  Reasons for the utilization of the services of traditional birth attendants during childbirth: A qualitative study in Northern Ghana.

Authors:  Philip Teg-Nefaah Tabong; Joseph Maaminu Kyilleh; William Wilberforce Amoah
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.