Literature DB >> 23483416

[Complication rates and secondary interventions after coronary procedures in clinical routine: 1-year follow-up based on routine data of a German health insurance company].

E Jeschke1, H T Baberg, P Dirschedl, K Heyde, B Levenson, J Malzahn, T Mansky, M Möckel, C Günster.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Data on 1-year complication and follow-up intervention rates after coronary angiography (CA) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in German clinical routine are sparse. This analysis aims to determine these rates.
METHODS: The analysis uses 2009 AOK claims data. Patients were divided into 3 groups (CA, without cardiac surgery and without acute myocardial infarction (AMI) n=116.071; PCI with stenting, without AMI: n=36.685; PCI with stenting and with AMI: n=32.707). The frequency of the endpoints MACCE (mortality, AMI, stroke, TIA), CABG, PCI and CA was recorded for up to one year.
RESULTS: 1-year MACCE rates were 8.1 % (CA), 9.9 % (PCI without AMI) and 17.9 % (PCI with AMI). Quality-relevant follow-up intervention rates in the CA group were 2.5 % for CABG (after 31-365 days), 1.7 % for PCI within 90 days and 3.5 % for follow-up CA within 1 year. In the PCI groups, the frequencies were 1.6 % (without AMI) and 2.7 % (with AMI) for CABG (after 31-365 days), and 10.2 % (without AMI) and 10.1 % (with AMI) for PCI after 91-365 days.
CONCLUSION: This is the first cross-sectoral routine analysis of cardiac catheters and sequential events up to one year in Germany. The actual medical care situation revealed information particularly with regard to the second and follow-up inventions, which cannot be derived directly from medical guidelines. Beyond clinical trials, knowledge can be gained which is important both for medicine as well as the politics of health services. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23483416     DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1333012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dtsch Med Wochenschr        ISSN: 0012-0472            Impact factor:   0.628


  6 in total

1.  The Potential of High-Dimensional Propensity Scores in Health Services Research: An Exemplary Study on the Quality of Care for Elective Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.

Authors:  Dirk Enders; Christoph Ohlmeier; Edeltraut Garbe
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Comparing routine administrative data with registry data for assessing quality of hospital care in patients with myocardial infarction using deterministic record linkage.

Authors:  Birga Maier; Katrin Wagner; Steffen Behrens; Leonhard Bruch; Reinhard Busse; Dagmar Schmidt; Helmut Schühlen; Roland Thieme; Heinz Theres
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  Cohort profile: the Coronary Artery disease Risk Determination In Innsbruck by diaGnostic ANgiography (CARDIIGAN) cohort.

Authors:  Maria Wanitschek; Michael Edlinger; Jakob Dörler; Hannes F Alber
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Outcomes Based on Decision-Making Capacity.

Authors:  Jarmanjeet Singh; Nicholas Kassis; Keerat R Ahuja; Chirag Sheth; Beni R Verma; Saket Saxena; Amar Krishnaswamy; Stephen Ellis; Jaikirshan Khatri; Venu Menon; Samir R Kapadia
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2021-08-28       Impact factor: 5.501

5.  Exercise-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation: Secondary Data Analyses of Mortality and Working Capacity in Germany, 2010-2017.

Authors:  Lars Gabrys; Johannes Soff; Christian Thiel; Christian Schmidt; Enno Swart; Dirk Peschke
Journal:  Sports Med Open       Date:  2021-12-04

6.  Identifying and Investigating Ambulatory Care Sequences Before Invasive Coronary Angiography.

Authors:  Anna Novelli; Julia Frank-Tewaag; Julian Bleek; Christian Günster; Udo Schneider; Ursula Marschall; Kathrin Schlößler; Norbert Donner-Banzhoff; Leonie Sundmacher
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2022-06-04       Impact factor: 3.178

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.